Editorial Policies

Focus and Scope

Jurnal Abdi Seni memiliki fokus pada hasil pengabdian kepada masyarakat, baik itu pengabdian yang dilakukan oleh tenaga pengajar maupun hasil laporan KKN yang dilakukan oleh mahasiswa. Cakupan jurnal Abdi Seni memiliki ranah keilmuan di bidang seni rupa dan desain serta seni pertunjukan (Tari, Karawitan, Pedalangan, Teater, Etnomusikologi, dll), yang mampu memberikan banyak manfaat untuk masyarakat serta menambah literasi dalam berkesenian. Tujuan dari publikasi jurnal ini adalah untuk menyebarkan pemikiran konseptual atau ide-ide dan hasil penelitian yang telah dicapai di bidang pengabdian kepada masyarakat.

Jurnal Pengabdian kepada Masyarakat, berisi berbagai kegiatan tenaga pengajar  ataupun mahasiswa saat melakukan kegiatan KKN dalam menangani dan mengelola berbagai potensi, hambatan, tantangan, dan permasalahan yang ada di masyarakat. Pelaksanaan kegiatan pelayanan juga melibatkan partisipasi masyarakat dan mitra. Kegiatan pelayanan diselenggarakan menjadi kegiatan yang bertujuan untuk meningkatkan kesejahteraan masyarakat.

Jurnal ini terbit dua kali dalam setahun, yaitu bulan Juni dan bulan Desember. Setiap penulis yang tertarik dapat mengirimkan naskah mengikuti pedoman pengajuan. Silakan baca panduan ini dengan saksama. Penulis yang ingin menyerahkan naskahnya ke kantor redaksi Jurnal Pengabdian kepada Masyarakat harus mematuhi pedoman penulisan. Jika naskah yang dikirimkan tidak sesuai dengan pedoman atau ditulis dalam format yang berbeda, naskah tersebut akan ditolak oleh editor sebelum ditinjau lebih lanjut. Editor hanya akan menerima naskah yang memenuhi format yang ditetapkan.

 

Section Policies

Articles

Checked Open Submissions Checked Indexed Checked Peer Reviewed
 

Peer Review Process

Seluruh artikel akan direview pertama kali oleh editor. Evaluasi ini meliputi fokus dan cakupan jurnal, tingkat similarity, dan template jurnal. Apabila tidak memenuhi ketentuan, artikel akan segera dikembalikan ke penulis. Program yang digunakan untuk cek similarity adalah iThenticate.

Setelah melewati proses review awal, artikel akan dikirim ke minimal 2 orang reviewer menggunakan kebijakan double blind review. Seluruh komentar dari reviewer akan dikirimkan ke corresponding email yang tercatat pada setiap artikel. Editor akan memberikan informasi ke penulis terkait hasil akhir penilaian paling lambat 2 bulan setelah paper disubmit.

Keputusan akhir editor terkait artikel diputuskan berdasarkan hasil evaluasi akhir dari rapat tim editor jurnal. Selanjutnya, editor akan mengirimkan hasil akhir penilaian kepada penulis. Pengelola jurnal merekomendasikan penulis untuk menggunakan software referensi seperti Mendeley. Jurnal ini hanya menerima paper yang ditulis dalam bahasa Indonesia atau Inggris

 

Publication Frequency

Jurnal Abdi Seni terbit 2 kali dalam satu tahun pada bulan Juni dan Desember

 

Open Access Policy

This journal provides immediate open access to its content on the principle that making research freely available to the public supports a greater global exchange of knowledge.

 

Publication Ethics and Publication Malpractice Statement

Section A: Publication and authorship 

  1. All submitted papers are subject to strict peer-review process by at least two reviewers that are experts in the area of the particular paper.
  2. Review process are blind peer review.
  3. The factors that are taken into account in review are relevance, soundness, significance, originality, readability and language.
  4. The possible decisions include acceptance, acceptance with revisions, or rejection.
  5. If authors are encouraged to revise and resubmit a submission, there is no guarantee that the revised submission will be accepted.
  6. Rejected articles will not be re-reviewed.
  7. The paper acceptance is constrained by such legal requirements as shall then be in force regarding libel, copyright infringement and plagiarism.
  8. No research can be included in more than one publication. 

Section B: Authors’ responsibilities

  1. Authors must certify that their manuscripts are their original work.
  2. Authors must certify that the manuscript has not previously been published elsewhere.
  3. Authors must certify that the manuscript is not currently being considered for publication elsewhere. 
  4. Authors must participate in the peer review process. 
  5. Authors are obliged to provide retractions or corrections of mistakes.
  6. All Authors mentioned in the paper must have significantly contributed to the research.
  7. Authors must state that all data in the paper are real and authentic.
  8. Authors must notify the Editors of any conflicts of interest.
  9. Authors must identify all sources used in the creation of their manuscript.
  10. Authors must report any errors they discover in their published paper to the Editors. 

Section C: Reviewers’ responsibilities

  1. Reviewers should keep all information regarding papers confidential and treat them as privileged information. 
  2. Reviews should be conducted objectively, with no personal criticism of the author
  3. Reviewers should express their views clearly with supporting arguments
  4. Reviewers should identify relevant published work that has not been cited by the authors.
  5. Reviewers should also call to the Editor in Chief’s attention any substantial similarity or overlap between the manuscript under consideration and any other published paper of which they have personal knowledge.
  6. Reviewers should not review manuscripts in which they have conflicts of interest resulting from competitive, collaborative, or other relationships or connections with any of the authors, companies, or institutions connected to the papers. 

Section D: Editors’ responsibilities

  1. Editors have complete responsibility and authority to reject/accept an article.
  2. Editors are responsible for the contents and overall quality of the publication.
  3. Editors should always consider the needs of the authors and the readers when attempting to improve the publication.
  4. Editors should guarantee the quality of the papers and the integrity of the academic record.
  5. Editors should publish errata pages or make corrections when needed.
  6. Editors should have a clear picture of a research’s funding sources.
  7. Editors should base their decisions solely one the papers’ importance, originality, clarity and relevance to publication’s scope.
  8. Editors should not reverse their decisions nor overturn the ones of previous editors without serious reason. 
  9. Editors should preserve the anonymity of reviewers. 
  10. Editors should ensure that all research material they publish conforms to internationally accepted ethical guidelines.
  11. Editors should only accept a paper when reasonably certain.
  12. Editors should act if they suspect misconduct, whether a paper is published or unpublished, and make all reasonable attempts to persist in obtaining a resolution to the problem.
  13. Editors should not reject papers based on suspicions, they should have proof of misconduct.
  14. Editors should not allow any conflicts of interest between staff, authors, reviewers and board members.

 

Retraction

The papers published in the Abdi Seni will be consider to retract in the publication if :

  1. They have clear evidence that the findings are unreliable, either as a result of misconduct (e.g. data fabri-cation) or honest error (e.g. miscalculation or experimental error)
  2. The findings have previously been published elsewhere without proper crossreferencing, permission orjustification (i.e. cases of redundant publication)
  3. it constitutes plagiarism
  4. it reports unethical research

The mechanism of retraction follow the Retraction Guidelines of Committee on Publication Ethics (COPE) which can be accessed at https://publicationethics.org/files/retraction%20guidelines.pdf.

 

CrossMark policy

CrossMark is a multi-publisher initiative from Crossref to provide a standard way for readers to locate the current version of a piece of content.

By applying the Crossmark logo, Abdi Seni is committing to maintaining the content it publishes and to alerting readers to changes if and when they occur. 

Clicking on the Crossmark logo on a document will tell you the current status of a document and may also give you additional publication record information about the document.

For more information on CrossMark, please visit the CrossMark site.

The Abdi Seni content that will have the CrossMark logo is restricted to current and future journal content and is limited to specific publication types. Articles in Press will not have the CrossMark icon for the present.

For general author guidelines and information, please see: 

https://jurnal.isi-ska.ac.id/index.php/abdiseni/about/submissions#authorGuidelines

 

Policy of Screening for Plagiarism

Papers submitted to Abdi Seni will be screened for plagiarism using CrossCheck/iThenticate plagiarism detection tools. International Journal of Visual and Performing Arts will immediately reject papers leading to plagiarism or self-plagiarism.

Before submitting articles to reviewers, those are first checked for similarity/plagiarism tool, by a member of the editorial team. The papers submitted to Abdi Seni must have a similarity level of less than 15%.

Plagiarism is the exposing of another person’s thoughts or words as though they were your own, without permission, credit, or acknowledgement, or because of failing to cite the sources properly. Plagiarism can take diverse forms, from literal copying to paraphrasing the work of another. To properly judge whether an author has plagiarized, we emphasize the following possible situations:

  • An author can copy another author’s work- by copying word by word, in whole or in part, without permission, acknowledge or citing the source. This practice can be identified by comparing the source and the manuscript/work who is suspected of plagiarism.
  • Substantial copying implies for an author to reproduce a substantial part of another author, without permission, acknowledge or citation. The substantial term can be understood both in terms of quality as quantity, being often used in the context of Intellectual property. Quality refers to the relative value of the copied text in proportion to the work as a whole.
  • Paraphrasing involves taking ideas, words or phrases from a source and crafting them into new sentences within the writing. This practice becomes unethical when the author does not properly cite or does not acknowledge the original work/author. This form of plagiarism is the more difficult form to be identified.