IKONOGRAFI RELIEF CANDI PENATARAN
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.33153/acy.v9i1.2117Abstract
The article titled “Kajian Ikonografi Relief Candi Penataran†was intended to find the textual andcontextual meaning of relief that was located in the Penataran Temple cluster, especially PendapaTeras II Penataran Temple. With iconography approach would be obtained a deeper and broadermeaning of an art work, although understanding on the contextual and symbolic aspects was alsoneeded. Thus, in the study of iconography there were aspects of diachronic, synchronic, and symbolic. In the study of Sri Tanjung relief, its diachronic aspects related to the history of temple relief asa dialectical motion, idea, or artistic concept based on the progress from beginning to end based onthe time sequence. The synchronic aspect related to the interrelatedness of the various social, cultural, and even mental facts of the society of an age in which art was produced. In the case, the SriTanjung relief would find its context when examined through the search of socio-cultural history atthe time of temple relief making and been analyzed based on the idea of relief presenting. In the studyof Sri Tanjung relief, it was understood that humans who had been willing to think about their Lord,humans who had been willing to obey or being obedient as an expression of their love for the God,and humans who had devotion to their God. If humans had reached a pure level in their heart andmind then that was where humans reached perfection. Perfection in the concept of Java meant humans had merge or ‘manunggal’ with God. Manunggal meant God was inside humans, in their heart thatcould not be separated. Perfection in terms of its form was because they was a perfect manifestationor image of God’s image, he reflected God’s name and attribuuted in complete. The perfection in termsof knowledge was because they had attained the highest level of consciousness, that was, to realizethe unity of their essence with God.Keywords: adaptation, iconography, morality, Sri Tanjung reliefDownloads
References
Agus Burhan, Perkembangan Seni Lukis Mooi
Indie sampai Persagi di Batavia, 1900-
Jakarta: Galeri Nasional Indonesia
dan Depertemen Kebudayaan dan
Pariwisata Republik Indonesia. 2008
Claire Holt, diterjemahkan oleh R.M Soedarsono.
Seni di Indonesia Kontinuitas dan
Perubahan. Yogyakarta: Institut seni Indonesia Yogyakarta.1991
Feldman, Edmund Burke. Art As Image and Idea,
New Jersey Prentice Hall, Inc. 1967
Fransisco Budi Hardiman. Kebudayaan dan Agama.
Yogyakarta: Kansius,1992.
Franz Magnis Suseno. Etika Jawa. Jakarta:
Gramedia Pustaka Utama. 1996
Koentjaraningrat.Kebudayaan Jawa. Jakarta: Balai
Pustaka, 1994.
Lydia Kieven.Simbolisme Cerita Panji Dalam Relief-Relief Di Candi Zaman Majapahit
Dan Nilainya Pada Masa
Kini.Malang:Pusat Panji.2014
Panofsky, Erwin. Meaning In The Visual Art., Chicago: The University of Chicago Press,
Poerbatjaraka, R.M.Ng, Tjeritera Pandji dalam
Perbandingan.Diterjemahkan ke dalam
Bahasa Indonesia oleh Zuber Usman dan
H.B.Jassin. Djakarta: PT.Gunung Agung.
Soenyono Wisnoe Pradono.Memperkenalkan
Kompleks Percandian Penataran.
Mojokerto: KPN Purbakala, 1995.
Suleiman, Satyawati, The Pendopo Terrace of
Panataran. Pictorial number 2. Jakarta:
Proyek Pelita Pembinaan Kepurbakalaan
dan Peninggalan Nasional.1978.
Widyawati, Setya. Buku Ajar Filsafat Seni.
Surakarta: STSI Press
Zoetmulder,P.J., , Kalangwan: Sastra Jawa Kuna
Selayang Pandang. Diterjemahkan ke
dalam Bahasa Indonesia oleh Dick
Hartoko SJ. Jakarta: Djambatan. 1983
Narasumber
Dwi Nurcahyo (52 tahun), Arkeolog Universitas
Negeri Malang, seorang doktor yang
konsern mengkaji relief candi di Jawa
Timur
Suwanto (58 Tahun), Juru Kunci dan Sesepuh
Kompleks Candi Penataran
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2018 A., Afrizal

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
Author continues to retain the copyright if the article is published in this journal. The publisher will only need publishing rights