KUASA SIMBOLIK PATUNG RUANG PUBLIK : STUDI KASUS DI WILAYAH KOTA SURAKARTA
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.33153/bri.v10i1.2177Abstract
ABSTRACTThis article is the result of research examining how the development of public art, definitive public space sculpture and conventions that surround it, to see the extent to which the political dimension sees how to make the existence of public sculpture as a tool of legitimacy of power, development of image and power and contact with social discourse that develops in society.From the qualitative method of the Slamet Riyadi Statue on Jalan Slamet Riyadi, the Major Achmadi Statue in the Banjarsari Lima Proximity (Proliman), 45 Banjarsari Monument Statue (Serangan 4 Hari Monument in Surakarta) is located in Banjarsari Park, and the Statue Soekarno at Manahan Sports Complex, Surakarta, found that the existence of the statue was a proof of how the symbolic system was carried out to legitimize power by government authorities.Various forms of work that illustrate the dominance of militaristic icons compared to civilian icons, which shows how the quo vadis of military-civil relations are explicit and implied. Furthermore, this research found evidence that so far there have been a lot of public space sculptural works that do not idolize the public's need for living space.Symbolic power practices are continuously echoed through a system of visual language and symbolization that shows how power sneaks under the conscious space of society. The community is not aware of how the power system stands and hides behind these sculptures of public space, whatever the reason for their establishment; inheritance of nationalism, development of moral values, even ideology.Keywords: history, public space sculpture, symbolic of power, Surakarta CityDownloads
References
DAFTAR PUSTAKA
Adi, Wicaksono dan Bambang
Budjono. 2012. Seni Rupa
Indonesia dalam Kritik dan Esai,
Seni Rupa Indonesia dalam Kritik
dan Esai (SRI). Jakarta : Dewan
Kesenian Jakarta.
Blau, Peter M. 1963. “Critical
remarks on Weber‟s theory of
authority.†Washington : American
Political Science Review.
Bourdieu, Pierre. 1991. Language
and Symbolic Power. 1 ed.
Cambridge: Polity Press.
Budiarjo, Miriam. 2004. DasarDasar Ilmu Politik. Jakarta:
Gramedia.
Miles, Mark. 1997. Art, Space and
the City -public art and urban
futures. London&New York:
Routledge.
Claire Holt. 2000. Art In Indonesia:Continuity and Change. Versi
Indonesianya ditulis oleh:
Sudarsono, Bandung: MSPI.
Kasiyanto, 2005, Analisis Wacana
dan teoritis Penafsiran Teks, dalam
Analisis Data Penelitian Kualitatif:
Pemahaman Filosofis dan
Metodologis ke Arah Penguasaan
Model Aplikasi, ed. Burhan Bungin
.Jakarta: Rajagrafindo Persada.
Kusnadi,dkk. 1978. Seni Rupa
Indonesia dan Pembinaannya.
Jakarta: Proyek Pembinaan
Kesenian Departemen P dan K.
Muhadjir, Noeng, 2007, Metodologi
Keilmuan: Paradigma Kualitatif,
Kuantitatif dan Mixed, edisi
v.Yogyakarta: Rake Sarasin.
Moeliono, Anton M. 1990. Kamus
Besar Bahasa Indonesia. Jakarta:
Balai Pustaka (Departemen
Pendidikan dan Kebudayaan).
Moyer, Glenn Harper dan Twylene.
Conversations on Sculpture.
Washington: Hamilton International
Sculpture Center.
Nazir, Moh., 2005, Metode
Penelitian, Bogor Selatan: Ghalia
Indonesia
Read, Hebert. 1964. A Concise
History of Modern Sculpture, New
York: Frederick A. Praeger,
Publishers.
Susanto. Mikke. 2003. Membongkar
Seni rupa. Yogyakarta : Jendela.
Soemardjo, Jakob.2009. Asal-Usul
Seni Rupa Modern Indonesia.
Bandung : Penerbit Kelir.
Sp., Soedarso. 1990. Tinjauan Seni
Sebuah Pengantar Untuk Apresiasi
Seni. Yogyakarta: Saku Dayar
Sana.
Sp., Soedarso. 2000 Sejarah
Perkembangan Seni Rupa
Indonesia, Yogyakarta : CV. Studio
Delapan Puluh Enterprise dan
Badan Penerbit ISI Yogyakarta
_________., But Muchtar, Jim
Supangkat, G. Sidharta Soegijo &
Kasman KS. 1992, Seni Patung
Indonesia, Yogyakarta : BP ISI
Yogyakarta.
Yuliman, Sanento. 2001. Dua Seni
Rupa :,Sepilihan Tulisan. Bandung:
Penerbit Kalam.
Jurnal
Budiani. 1963. Arah Menuju Seni
Pahat Kita, Jurnal Budaya bulan
maret/april/mei 1963. No 3/4/5 th ke
XII.
Muchtar, But. 1985, “Seni Patung
dalam Kaitannya dengan
Kehidupan Manusiaâ€, Pidato
pengukuha jabatan guru besar tetap
pada Fakultas Seni Rupa dan
Desain Istitut Teknologi Bandung,
Sidang Terbuka Senat Institut
Teknologi Bandung 19 Oktober
Sumarwahyudi. 1996. Seni
Monumen Indonesia dari Masa ke
Masa. Jurnal Bahasa dan Seni
Tahun 24. No.2 Agustus 1996.
Wienarno, Eko Budi. 2003. Seni
Patung Indonesia: Perkembangan
Dan Kesinambungan Proses Kreatif
Penciptaan Patung Di Indonesia.
Jurnal BAHASA DAN SENI, Tahun
, Nomor 2, Agustus 2003.Blau, Peter M. 1963. “Critical
remarks on Weber‟s theory of
authority.†American Political
Science Review 57 (2): 305–16.
Bourdieu, Pierre. 1989. “Social
Space and Symbolic Power.â€
Sociological Theory 7 (1): 14–25..
Elsen, Albert. 1989. “What We Have
Learned about Modern Public
Sculpture: Ten Propositions.†Art
Journal, Critical Issues in Public Art,
(4): 291–97.
Fenz, Werner, dan Maria-Regina
Kecht. 1989. “The Monument Is
Invisible, the Sign Visible.†October
: 75–78.
Hein, Hilde. 1996. “What Is Public
Art?: Time, Place, and Meaning.â€
The Journal of Aesthetics and Art
Criticism 54 (1): 1–7.
Montgomery, Olwyn. 2000. “Do the
„Public‟ Like It?†Fortnight, no. 385:
–23.
Internet
http://arsip.galerinasional.
or.id/documentations/9192/detail.
(Akses 22 Maret 2016)
http://www.jakarta.go.id/web/encycl
opedia/detail/2811/SidhartaSoegijo-G. (Akses 22 Maret
.
http://blogsenirupa.
blogspot.co.id/2013/05/biografiedhisunarsodan-karya.html. (Akses 22 Maret
.
http://sagidigajinta.blogspot.co.id/20
/06/hen
dra-gunawan-patung-jendsudirman.html.
(Akses 22 Maret 2016).
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
Author continues to retain the copyright if the article is published in this journal. The publisher will only need publishing rights