KUASA SIMBOLIK PATUNG RUANG PUBLIK : STUDI KASUS DI WILAYAH KOTA SURAKARTA

Main Article Content

Muhammad Hendra Himawan

Abstract

ABSTRACTThis article is the result of research examining how the development of public art, definitive public space sculpture and conventions that surround it, to see the extent to which the political dimension sees how to make the existence of public sculpture as a tool of legitimacy of power, development of image and power and contact with social discourse that develops in society.From the qualitative method of the Slamet Riyadi Statue on Jalan Slamet Riyadi, the Major Achmadi Statue in the Banjarsari Lima Proximity (Proliman), 45 Banjarsari Monument Statue (Serangan 4 Hari Monument in Surakarta) is located in Banjarsari Park, and the Statue Soekarno at Manahan Sports Complex, Surakarta, found that the existence of the statue was a proof of how the symbolic system was carried out to legitimize power by government authorities.Various forms of work that illustrate the dominance of militaristic icons compared to civilian icons, which shows how the quo vadis of military-civil relations are explicit and implied. Furthermore, this research found evidence that so far there have been a lot of public space sculptural works that do not idolize the public's need for living space.Symbolic power practices are continuously echoed through a system of visual language and symbolization that shows how power sneaks under the conscious space of society. The community is not aware of how the power system stands and hides behind these sculptures of public space, whatever the reason for their establishment; inheritance of nationalism, development of moral values, even ideology.Keywords: history, public space sculpture, symbolic of power, Surakarta City

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Article Details

Section
Articles

References

DAFTAR PUSTAKA

Adi, Wicaksono dan Bambang

Budjono. 2012. Seni Rupa

Indonesia dalam Kritik dan Esai,

Seni Rupa Indonesia dalam Kritik

dan Esai (SRI). Jakarta : Dewan

Kesenian Jakarta.

Blau, Peter M. 1963. “Critical

remarks on Weber‟s theory of

authority.†Washington : American

Political Science Review.

Bourdieu, Pierre. 1991. Language

and Symbolic Power. 1 ed.

Cambridge: Polity Press.

Budiarjo, Miriam. 2004. DasarDasar Ilmu Politik. Jakarta:

Gramedia.

Miles, Mark. 1997. Art, Space and

the City -public art and urban

futures. London&New York:

Routledge.

Claire Holt. 2000. Art In Indonesia:Continuity and Change. Versi

Indonesianya ditulis oleh:

Sudarsono, Bandung: MSPI.

Kasiyanto, 2005, Analisis Wacana

dan teoritis Penafsiran Teks, dalam

Analisis Data Penelitian Kualitatif:

Pemahaman Filosofis dan

Metodologis ke Arah Penguasaan

Model Aplikasi, ed. Burhan Bungin

.Jakarta: Rajagrafindo Persada.

Kusnadi,dkk. 1978. Seni Rupa

Indonesia dan Pembinaannya.

Jakarta: Proyek Pembinaan

Kesenian Departemen P dan K.

Muhadjir, Noeng, 2007, Metodologi

Keilmuan: Paradigma Kualitatif,

Kuantitatif dan Mixed, edisi

v.Yogyakarta: Rake Sarasin.

Moeliono, Anton M. 1990. Kamus

Besar Bahasa Indonesia. Jakarta:

Balai Pustaka (Departemen

Pendidikan dan Kebudayaan).

Moyer, Glenn Harper dan Twylene.

Conversations on Sculpture.

Washington: Hamilton International

Sculpture Center.

Nazir, Moh., 2005, Metode

Penelitian, Bogor Selatan: Ghalia

Indonesia

Read, Hebert. 1964. A Concise

History of Modern Sculpture, New

York: Frederick A. Praeger,

Publishers.

Susanto. Mikke. 2003. Membongkar

Seni rupa. Yogyakarta : Jendela.

Soemardjo, Jakob.2009. Asal-Usul

Seni Rupa Modern Indonesia.

Bandung : Penerbit Kelir.

Sp., Soedarso. 1990. Tinjauan Seni

Sebuah Pengantar Untuk Apresiasi

Seni. Yogyakarta: Saku Dayar

Sana.

Sp., Soedarso. 2000 Sejarah

Perkembangan Seni Rupa

Indonesia, Yogyakarta : CV. Studio

Delapan Puluh Enterprise dan

Badan Penerbit ISI Yogyakarta

_________., But Muchtar, Jim

Supangkat, G. Sidharta Soegijo &

Kasman KS. 1992, Seni Patung

Indonesia, Yogyakarta : BP ISI

Yogyakarta.

Yuliman, Sanento. 2001. Dua Seni

Rupa :,Sepilihan Tulisan. Bandung:

Penerbit Kalam.

Jurnal

Budiani. 1963. Arah Menuju Seni

Pahat Kita, Jurnal Budaya bulan

maret/april/mei 1963. No 3/4/5 th ke

XII.

Muchtar, But. 1985, “Seni Patung

dalam Kaitannya dengan

Kehidupan Manusiaâ€, Pidato

pengukuha jabatan guru besar tetap

pada Fakultas Seni Rupa dan

Desain Istitut Teknologi Bandung,

Sidang Terbuka Senat Institut

Teknologi Bandung 19 Oktober

Sumarwahyudi. 1996. Seni

Monumen Indonesia dari Masa ke

Masa. Jurnal Bahasa dan Seni

Tahun 24. No.2 Agustus 1996.

Wienarno, Eko Budi. 2003. Seni

Patung Indonesia: Perkembangan

Dan Kesinambungan Proses Kreatif

Penciptaan Patung Di Indonesia.

Jurnal BAHASA DAN SENI, Tahun

, Nomor 2, Agustus 2003.Blau, Peter M. 1963. “Critical

remarks on Weber‟s theory of

authority.†American Political

Science Review 57 (2): 305–16.

Bourdieu, Pierre. 1989. “Social

Space and Symbolic Power.â€

Sociological Theory 7 (1): 14–25..

Elsen, Albert. 1989. “What We Have

Learned about Modern Public

Sculpture: Ten Propositions.†Art

Journal, Critical Issues in Public Art,

(4): 291–97.

Fenz, Werner, dan Maria-Regina

Kecht. 1989. “The Monument Is

Invisible, the Sign Visible.†October

: 75–78.

Hein, Hilde. 1996. “What Is Public

Art?: Time, Place, and Meaning.â€

The Journal of Aesthetics and Art

Criticism 54 (1): 1–7.

Montgomery, Olwyn. 2000. “Do the

„Public‟ Like It?†Fortnight, no. 385:

–23.

Internet

http://arsip.galerinasional.

or.id/documentations/9192/detail.

(Akses 22 Maret 2016)

http://www.jakarta.go.id/web/encycl

opedia/detail/2811/SidhartaSoegijo-G. (Akses 22 Maret

.

http://blogsenirupa.

blogspot.co.id/2013/05/biografiedhisunarsodan-karya.html. (Akses 22 Maret

.

http://sagidigajinta.blogspot.co.id/20

/06/hen

dra-gunawan-patung-jendsudirman.html.

(Akses 22 Maret 2016).