Sureal Jewelry Art of Méret Oppenheim and Salvador Dali Jewelry Being Representations of Fetish Objects

Authors

  • Dhyani Widiyanti Universitas Sanata Dharma

Keywords:

Dali, Fetishism, Jewelry, Oppenheim, Surrealism

Abstract

In the 20th century, developments in the style of jewelry art were marked, among others, by the emergence of surrealism. The two vanguards who could be held responsible for such a movement were Méret Oppenheim and Salvador Dali. Surrealism, as a movement in art and literature was heavily influenced by Sigmund Freud's study of the unconscious. In the views of its founder, André Breton, it must contain dream analysis, free association, and an attempt to liberate the imagination. Additionally, fetishism is a term that refers to the assumption that all objects made by humans are imbued with more force than just their inherent functions. In an essay entitled Fetishism by Sigmund Freud in 1927, fetishism is associated to the realm of the subconscious which contains sexual instincts. This qualitative research which employs visual analysis examines jewelries, which are named Sugar Ring and Fur Bracelet created by Oppenheim, as well as Ruby Lips with Teeth Like Pearls, and The Royal Heart created by Dali, based on their association to elements of surrealism and fetishism as described in Breton’s views published in an article written by Malt (2004). The results of this study indicate that the four works contain elements of surrealism and fetishism since they fulfill the elements of juxtaposition, the presence of hair-like objects, the presence of images of incomplete body organ as manifestations of a castration experience, and magical or non-representational impressions.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Akbar, F. (2025). Perempuan, kebaya, dan narasi visual: Studi penciptaan karya kolase digital bergaya lowbrow art. Brikolase: Jurnal Kajian Teori, Praktik dan Wacana Seni Budaya Rupa, 17(2), 187–205. https://doi.org/10.33153/brikolase.v17i2.7425

Breton, A. (1972). Manifestoes of surrealism (R. Seaver & H. R. Lane, Trans.). The University of Michigan Press.

Bühler, K., & Oppenheim, M. (2013). Merets Funken = Meret’s sparks. Kerber Verlag.

Burckhardt, J., & Curiger, B. (Eds.). (1996). Meret Oppenheim: Beyond the teacup. Independent Curators International.

Danial, E., & Warsiah. (2009). Metode penulisan karya ilmiah. Laboratorium Pendidikan Kewarganegaraan.

Eipeldauer, H. (2013). Meret Oppenheim’s masquerades. In I. Brugger (Ed.), Meret Oppenheim: Retrospective. Hatje Cantz.

Forcer, S. (2019). From Paris to Tlön: Surrealism as world literature (Review of the book From Paris to Tlön: Surrealism as World Literature, by D. Ungureanu). French Studies, 73(3), 486–487. https://doi.org/10.1093/fs/knz091

Freud, S. (1927). Fetishism (J. Strachey, Trans.). In The standard edition of the complete psychological works of Sigmund Freud (Vol. 21, pp. 147–157). Hogarth Press.

Gemerchak, C. M. (2008). Everyday extraordinary: Encountering fetishism with Marx, Freud and Lacan. Leuven University Press.

Gibson, I. (1997). The shameful life of Salvador Dalí. Faber and Faber.

Hopkins, D. (2004). Dada and surrealism: A very short introduction. Oxford University Press.

Kim, Y. (2025). Characteristics of surrealism and study of authors: Centered on Salvador Dalí, René Magritte, M. C. Escher. Korea Institute of Design Research Society, 10, 822–834. https://doi.org/10.46248/kidrs.2025.2.822

Kuščević, D., & Brajčić, M. (2022). Surrealist artworks as a stimulus for student artistic expression. European Journal of Education, 5, 84. https://doi.org/10.26417/872mkw49

Malt, J. (2004). Obscure objects of desire: Surrealism, fetishism, and politics. Oxford University Press.

Malterud, K. (2001). Qualitative research: Standards, challenges, and guidelines. The Lancet, 358, 483–488. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0140-6736(01)05627-6

Mifflin, M. (1986, September). An interview with Meret Oppenheim. Women Artist News, 11, 30–32.

Nema, N. (2017). Psychology in art: The influence of Freudian theories on surrealist art. International Journal of Indian Psychology, 4(4). https://doi.org/10.25215/0404.119

Prayoga, R. R., & Karyono, T. (2025). Wujud stigma perempuan dalam seni lukis surealis. Brikolase: Jurnal Kajian Teori, Praktik dan Wacana Seni Budaya Rupa, 16(2), 197–206. https://doi.org/10.33153/brikolase.v16i2.6395

Rentzou, E. (2018). [Review of the book Surrealist ghostliness, by K. Conley, and Tiny surrealism: Salvador Dalí and the aesthetics of the small, by R. Rothman]. SubStance, 47(3), 167–175. https://doi.org/10.1353/sub.2018.0038

Soewardikoen, D. W. (2013). Metodologi penelitian visual: Dari seminar ke tugas akhir. Dinamika Komunika.

Somerville, O. (1993). Kite-shaped brooches. Journal of the Royal Society of Antiquaries of Ireland, 123, 59–101.

Stronciwilk, A. A. (2023). Between spring banquet and cannibal banquet: Cannibalistic imagery in Meret Oppenheim’s works. Arts, 12, 52. https://doi.org/10.3390/arts12020052

Tait, H. (1986). Seven thousand years of jewellery. British Museum Publications.

Texier, S. (2012). Paris: Panorama de l’architecture. Parigramme.

Downloads

Published

2026-07-31

How to Cite

Widiyanti, D. (2026). Sureal Jewelry Art of Méret Oppenheim and Salvador Dali Jewelry Being Representations of Fetish Objects. Brikolase : Jurnal Kajian Teori, Praktik Dan Wacana Seni Budaya Rupa, 18(1), 33–44. Retrieved from https://jurnal.isi-ska.ac.id/index.php/brikolase/article/view/8297

Issue

Section

Articles