Unveiling the aesthetic connection: Balinese wayang characters and the 'prodigal son' bible story

Authors

  • Andreas James Darmawan Institut Seni Indonesia Denpasar https://orcid.org/0000-0002-5557-6352
  • I Nyoman Sedana Institut Seni Indonesia Denpasar
  • Martinus Dwi Marianto Institut Seni Indonesia Yogyakarta

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.33153/dewaruci.v18i1.4674

Keywords:

Aesthetic theory, Balinese wayang, Prodigal son

Abstract

The Prodigal Son, a well-known biblical parable cherished by children, has never been depicted using Balinese wayang, presenting an opportunity for cultural enrichment. This research aims to select appropriate Balinese wayang characters for the Bible story "The Lost Child." The motivation behind this study is to bridge the gap between the western visual style often associated with biblical depictions and the captivating Balinese wayang tradition, rekindling children's interest and appreciation for the narrative. The qualitative research method utilizes Thomas Aquinas' Christian theoretical literature and Balinese aesthetic theory, complemented by interviews and FGDs with fellow Doctoral students. The findings yield a deep correlation between the aesthetic theories, laying the foundation for selecting wayang characters. Wayang Tualen represents the father's kind traits, while Merdah embodies the adventurous youngest son. Sangut portrays the passionate firstborn, Cenk and Blonk represent dynamic and critical aspects, and Delem embodies arrogance and cunning. The research discussions enrich the study's scope, contributing to Balinese cultural preservation and its fusion with global characterizations. This artistic amalgamation fosters cross-cultural appreciation and artistic regeneration among younger generations with both the characters in the story and the characters in the Balinese wayang.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

R. Barron, “God as artist,” Angelicum, vol. 80, no. 2, pp. 403–416, 2003.

I. W. Mudra, A. A. G. R. Remawa, and I. K. A. Wirawan, “Wayang Kamasan Painting and Its Development in Bali’s Handicrafts,” Cultura, vol. 17, no. 1, pp. 139–157, Jan. 2020, doi: 10.3726/CUL012020.0009.

A. J. Darmawan, W. Mudra, and I. K. Suteja, “Creation Process and Visual Aesthetics at Jesus and Mary Images in Balinese Wayang Characters,” Int. J. Innov. Creat. Chang. www. ijicc. net, vol. 17, no. 1, pp. 498–511, 2023.

I. Pitana, “Tri Hita Karana – The Local Wisdom of the Balinese in Managing Development,” in Trends and issues in Global Tourism, Berlin, Heidelberg: Springer Berlin Heidelberg, 2010, pp. 139–150. doi: 10.1007/978-3-642-10829-7_18

R. Barron and J. L. Allen Jr, To light a fire on the Earth: proclaiming the gospel in a secular age. New York: Crown Publishing Group, 2017.

R. M. Painter, “Further Thoughts on a Prodigal Son Who Cannot Come Home, on Loneliness and Grace: An Interview with Marilynne Robinson,” Christ. Lit., vol. 58, no. 3, pp. 485–492, Jun. 2009, doi: 10.1177/014833310905800312.

P. Tamara, G. R. L. L. Simatupang, G. Gustami, and I. W. Senen, “Preservation strategy through implementation of Hindu aesthetics on Balinese Pejaten pottery in Indonesia,” Int. J. Vis. Perform. Arts, vol. 3, no. 2, pp. 71–84, Dec. 2021, doi: 10.31763/viperarts.v3i2.421.

J. Kurscheid et al., “Shadow Puppets and Neglected Diseases: Evaluating a Health Promotion Performance in Rural Indonesia,” Int. J. Environ. Res. Public Health, vol. 15, no. 9, p. 2050, Sep. 2018, doi: 10.3390/ijerph15092050.

H. F. G. G. Manik, R. Christanti, and W. Setiawan, “Knowledge management and community-based enterprise: an initiative to preserve the shadow puppet traditional knowledge in Yogyakarta, Indonesia,” VINE Journal of Information and Knowledge Management Systems. 14-Mar-2022, doi: 10.1108/VJIKMS-11-2021-0265.

M. Lin, Z. Hu, S. Liu, M. Wang, R. Hong, and S. Yan, “eHeritage of shadow puppetry,” in Proceedings of the 21st ACM international conference on Multimedia, 2013, pp. 183–192, doi: 10.1145/2502081.2502104.

J. Darmawan, “Reintroducing ‘Wayang Punakawan’ as Cultural Heritage in Line Stickers Chat Form,” Adv. Sci. Lett., vol. 24, no. 12, pp. 9460–9464, Dec. 2018, doi: 10.1166/asl.2018.12298.

T. Li and W. Cao, “Research on a method of creating digital shadow puppets based on parameterized templates,” Multimed. Tools Appl., vol. 80, no. 13, pp. 20403–20422, May 2021, doi: 10.1007/s11042-021-10726-1.

G. O. F. Parikesit, “3D Wayang Kulit: traditional shadow puppetry meets modern display technology,” Int. J. Arts Technol., vol. 9, no. 2, pp. 162–172, 2016, doi: 10.1504/IJART.2016.077238.

M. I. Cohen, “Wayang in Jaman Now : Reflexive Traditionalization and Local, National and Global Networks of Javanese Shadow Puppet Theatre,” Theatr. Res. Int., vol. 44, no. 1, pp. 40–57, Mar. 2019, doi: 10.1017/S0307883318000834.

J. Darmawan, “Perancangan Komunikasi Visual Akulturasi Wayang Kristiani Sebagai Visualisasi Motion Graphic Kisah Kasih Sang Gusti,” Institut Seni Indonesia Yogyakarta, 2013.

S. Brown, “Building character through shadow puppetry,” Art Educ., vol. 57, no. 6, pp. 47–53, 2004. doi: 10.1080/00043125.2004.11653576

C. S. Steinberg, “The Aesthetic Theory of St. Thomas Aquinas,” Philos. Rev., vol. 50, no. 5, pp. 483–497, Sep. 1941, doi: 10.2307/2180620.

I. Nyoman Sedana, “Innovation of Wayang Puppet Theatre in Bali,” in Indigenous Culture, Education and Globalization, Berlin, Heidelberg: Springer Berlin Heidelberg, 2016, pp. 67–80. doi: 10.1007/978-3-662-48159-2_4

R. Basuki, “Panakawans Discourse Of Power In Javanese Shadow Puppet During The New Order Regime From Traditional Perspective To New Historicism,” K@ ta, vol. 8, no. 1, pp. 68–87, 2006.

E. S. Clark and R. M. Lindsey, Digital humanities and material religion: an introduction. Walter de Gruyter GmbH & Co KG, 2022. doi: 10.1515/9783110608755

D. P. Oka Prasiasa and D. A. Diyah Sri Widari, “Sate Renteng as a Cultural Tourist Attraction in Baha Tourism Village: Cultural Studies Perspective,” Mudra J. Seni Budaya, vol. 37, no. 4, pp. 382–394, Oct. 2022, doi: 10.31091/mudra.v37i4.2092.

M. J. Dodds, “Thomas Aquinas vis-à-vis Natural Theology, Theology of Nature, and Religious Naturalism,” Theol. Sci., vol. 15, no. 3, pp. 266–275, Jul. 2017, doi: 10.1080/14746700.2017.1335062.

A. D. Efland, “Conceptions of Teaching in Art Education,” Art Educ., vol. 32, no. 4, pp. 21–35, Apr. 1979, doi: 10.2307/3192385.

C. Taliaferro, “The Project of Natural Theology,” in The Blackwell Companion to Natural Theology, Wiley, 2009, pp. 1–23. doi: 10.1002/9781444308334.ch1

T. Nichols, “Transubstantiation and Eucharistic Presence,” Pro Eccles. A J. Cathol. Evang. Theol., vol. 11, no. 1, pp. 57–75, Feb. 2002, doi: 10.1177/106385120201100105.

A. Calhoun-Brown, “The Image of God: Black Theology and Racial Empowerment in the African American Community,” Rev. Relig. Res., vol. 40, no. 3, pp. 197–212, Mar. 1999, doi: 10.2307/3512367.

B. Davies, The Thought of Thomas Aquinas. Clarendon Press, 1992. doi: 10.1093/0198267533.001.0001

P. Henrici, “Hans Urs von Balthasar: A Sketch of his life,” Hans Urs von Balthasar: His Life and Work. pp. 7–43, 1989.

H. I. R. Hinzler, “Balinese palm-leaf manuscripts,” Bijdr. tot taal-, land- en Volkenkd. / J. Humanit. Soc. Sci. Southeast Asia, vol. 149, no. 3, pp. 438–473, 1993, doi: 10.1163/22134379-90003116.

J. Riches and J. K. Riches, The analogy of beauty: The theology of Hans Urs von Balthasar. A&C Black, 1986.

H. R. B. Mangunsong and W. Handayaningrum, “The creative process of the Potehi puppet craftsman in Gudo Jombang,” Dewa Ruci J. Pengkaj. dan Pencipta. Seni, vol. 17, no. 1, pp. 1–11, 2022.

C. S. Kilcourse, Taiping Theology: The Localization of Christianity in China. New York: Palgrave Macmillan US, 2016. doi: 10.1057/978-1-137-53728-7

Gede Wira Ady Saputra, Aron Meko Mbete, and I Nyoman Muliana, “Humor Discourse in Art Performances of Shadow Puppets Cenk Blonk,” Austronesian J. Lang. Sci. Lit., vol. 1, no. 2, pp. 56–73, Aug. 2022, doi: 10.59011/austronesian.1.2.2022.56-73.

I. N. Sedana and I. M. Sidia, “Brand New Balinese Water Puppetry ‘The Floating Subadra,’” South East Asian Rev., vol. 45–46, no. 1, pp. 187–200, Jan. 2022, doi: 10.32381/SEAR.2020-2021.45-46.1.10.

J. Suranto, R. Rustopo, and B. Sunarto, “Taksu and Shackle of the Aesthetic Regimes in the Literation of Laksita Jati Music Yeni Amara,” Int. J. Vis. Perform. Arts, vol. 2, no. 1, pp. 33–41, Jun. 2020, doi: 10.31763/viperarts.v2i1.131.

P. Dvořák, “The Concurrentism of Thomas Aquinas: Divine Causation and Human Freedom,” Philosophia (Mendoza)., vol. 41, no. 3, pp. 617–634, Sep. 2013, doi: 10.1007/s11406-013-9483-9.

Iis Purnengsih, “The Semiotics Study of Wayang Kulit Purwa Attribut of Garuda Mungkur in Surakarta Style,” IICACS Int. Interdiscip. Conf. Arts Creat. Stud., vol. 3, pp. 233–240, Apr. 2020, doi: 10.33153/iicacs.v3i1.44.

Downloads

Published

2023-06-03

Issue

Section

Articles