From soundscapes to societies: investigating gamelan's cultural impact through the socio-karawitanology paradigm

Authors

  • Sularso Sularso Elementary Teacher Education, Universitas Ahmad Dahlan Yogyakarta
  • Bao Hanshi Department of Ethnomusicology, Nanjing University of the Arts, Nanjing
  • Qinyu Yu Department of Ethnomusicology, Sydney Conservatorium of Music

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.33153/dewaruci.v18i1.5353

Keywords:

Karawitanology, Karawitan Function, Sociology of music, Sociology of karawitan, Epistemology of Socio Karawitanology

Abstract

This article investigates the auditory environment, known as "soundscapes," created by Gamelan, which comprises a distinctive combination of instruments, melodies, rhythms, and timbres that collectively shape the sonic experience. Recognizing the significance of understanding the auditory dimension of Gamelan and its influence on Indonesian society's cultural and social fabric, we explore the socio-karawitanology paradigm as the primary research topic. Our objective is to establish a novel gamelan research paradigm by integrating insights from sociology and karawitanology. The research methodology incorporates data from international journal articles and proceedings while also incorporating additional sources like field observations, expert interviews, and active engagement with the local community to ensure a comprehensive understanding of karawitan and its socio-cultural significance. Our analysis reveals that the socio-karawitanology paradigm provides a valuable framework for exploring the intricate and dynamic social dimensions prevalent in contemporary societal issues. The research contributes significantly by introducing the socio-karawitanology paradigm, opening avenues for fresh perspectives and insights in the field of karawitanology. It fosters a broader understanding of the socio-cultural impact of karawitan and stimulates further investigations into the interplay between music, society, and culture.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

S. D. Humardani and A. R. Roth, “The problem of development in Javanese karawitan today,” Indones. Circle. Sch. Orient. African Stud. Newsl., vol. 13, no. 37, pp. 7–13, Jun. 1985, doi: 10.1080/03062848508729610.

S. Hastanto, Kajian musik nusantara: Semester 1, kajian seni minat musik. Institut Seni Indonesia (ISI) Surakarta, 2012.

Waridi, “Tracing the Existence of Javanese Gamelan Music Through the Role of Karawitan Masters: The Pillars of the Existence of Surakarta Style Javanese Gamelan Music (1950s-1970s) Waridi, Institut Seni Indonesia Surakarta (ISI), Surakarta I.” Bandung, 2008.

J. Daryanto, R. Rustopo, and B. Sunarto, “The Aesthetics of Surakarta Palace’s Karawitan According to Serat Sri Karongron,” Dewa Ruci J. Pengkaj. dan Pencipta. Seni, vol. 15, no. 1, pp. 1–5, 2020, doi: https://doi.org/10.33153/dewaruci.v15i1.2766.

M. Tenzer, “The Life in Gendhing: Current Approaches to Javanese Gamelan.” JSTOR, 1997.

P. Yampolsky, “Forces for change in the regional performing arts of Indonesia,” Bijdr. tot taal-, land- en Volkenkd. / J. Humanit. Soc. Sci. Southeast Asia, vol. 151, no. 4, pp. 700–725, 1995, doi: 10.1163/22134379-90003035.

J. Daryanto, “Nengsemaken in Surakarta Karaton Karawitan Performance,” Int. J. Vis. Perform. Arts, vol. 1, no. 1, pp. 1–6, Jun. 2019, doi: 10.31763/viperarts.v1i1.7.

P. Lestari and S. Sularso, “The COVID-19 impact crisis communication model using gending jawa local wisdom,” Int. J. Commun. Soc., vol. 2, no. 1, pp. 47–57, Jun. 2020, doi: 10.31763/ijcs.v2i1.150.

D. R. Puguh, M. P. Utama, and R. Mufidah, “Acceptance of Javanese Karawitan in Japan: Appreciation of traditional culture and community activities,” Cogent Arts Humanit., vol. 10, no. 1, p. 2217586, Dec. 2023, doi: 10.1080/23311983.2023.2217586.

C. B. Handoyo, “The ‘Pakeliran Padat’ wayang show as an alternative to evoke interest in wayang and gamelan music,” Imaji, vol. 20, no. 2, pp. 104–113, Oct. 2022, doi: 10.21831/imaji.v20i2.48955.

D. L. Harwood, “Unplayed melodies: Javanese Gamelan and the Genesis of music theories,” Music Percept., vol. 24, no. 4, pp. 405–408, Apr. 2007, doi: 10.1525/mp.2007.24.4.405.

F. Hughes-Freeland, “Art and Politics: From Javanese Court Dance to Indonesian Art,” J. R. Anthropol. Inst., vol. 3, no. 3, pp. 473–495, Sep. 1997, doi: 10.2307/3034763.

S. Weiss, “Review Essay: Getting beyond Java: New Studies in Indonesian Music,” Ethnomusicology, vol. 51, no. 1, pp. 131–142, Jan. 2007, doi: 10.2307/20174505.

S. T. Widodo and A. Purwantoro, “The Changes of the Symbolic World in Gamelan,” in 3rd International Conference on Creative Media, Design and Technology (REKA 2018), 2018, pp. 383–387.

M. Hatch, “Towards a More Open Approach to the History of Javanese Music,” Indonesia, vol. 27, pp. 129–154, Apr. 1979, doi: 10.2307/3350819.

S. P. Walton, “Aesthetic and Spiritual Correlations in Javanese Gamelan Music,” J. Aesthet. Art Crit., vol. 65, no. 1, pp. 31–41, Jan. 2007, doi: 10.1111/j.1540-594X.2007.00235.x.

F. Hughes-Freeland, “Consciousness in performance: A Javanese theory,” Soc. Anthropol., vol. 5, no. 1, pp. 55–68, Jan. 2007, doi: 10.1111/j.1469-8676.1997.tb00340.x.

J. Daryanto, R. Rustopo, and B. Sunarto, “The Aesthetics of Surakarta Palace’s Karawitan According to Serat Sri Karongron,” Dewa Ruci J. Pengkaj. dan Pencipta. Seni, vol. 15, no. 1, pp. 1–5, Sep. 2020, doi: 10.33153/dewaruci.v15i1.2766.

N. I. Cooper, “Singing and Silences: Transformations of Power through Javanese Seduction Scenarios,” Am. Ethnol., vol. 27, no. 3, pp. 609–644, Aug. 2000, doi: 10.1525/ae.2000.27.3.609.

Christina Sunardi, “Making Sense and Senses of Locale through Perceptions of Music and Dance in Malang, East Java,” Asian Music, vol. 41, no. 1, pp. 89–126, 2010, doi: 10.1353/amu.0.0051.

B. Brinner, “Cultural Matrices and the Shaping of Innovation in Central Javanese Performing Arts,” Ethnomusicology, vol. 39, no. 3, pp. 433–456, Jan. 1995, doi: 10.2307/924630.

I. Meloni, “Foreign Sindhen in Practice: New Teaching Strategies and the Impact of Practice-Led Research on Javanese Female Singing,” Malaysian J. Music, vol. 10, no. 1, pp. 25–52, 2021, doi: https://doi.org/10.37134/mjm.vol10.1.3.2021.

S. Ediyono, S. Budi, and S. T. Widodo, “The Potentials of Gamelan as Education Tourism Media in Surakarta,” in Proceedings of the Third International Conference of Arts, Language and Culture (ICALC 2018), 2019, pp. 95–102, doi: 10.2991/icalc-18.2019.15.

M. J. Kartomi, J. Becker, A. H. Feinstein, H. Susilo, Sumarsam, and A. L. Becker, “Karawitan. Source Readings in Javanese Gamelan and Vocal Music. Volume 1.,” Pac. Aff., vol. 59, no. 3, p. 542, Jan. 1986, doi: 10.2307/2758373.

R. T. A. Lysloff, “Worlding Music in Jogjakarta: Tales of the Global Postmodern,” Ethnomusicology, vol. 60, no. 3, pp. 484–507, Oct. 2016, doi: 10.5406/ethnomusicology.60.3.0484.

S. Weiss, “Javanese rasa: Gendering emotion and restraint,” in Listening to an Earlier Java, BRILL, 2006, pp. 103–130.

R. Rizzo, “Knowledge Transmission in Javanese Karawitan: Is It Time for an Ontological Turn?,” Asian Music, vol. 51, no. 1, pp. 94–117, 2020, doi: 10.1353/amu.2020.0004.

C. J. Miller, “Orchids (and other difficult flowers) revisited: A reflection on composing for Gamelan in North America,” World Music, vol. 47, no. 3, pp. 81–111, 2005.

M. Hatch, “Towards a More Open Approach to the History of Javanese Music,” JSTOR, vol. 27, pp. 129–154, Apr. 1979, doi: 10.2307/3350819.

H. S. Powers, “Classical Music, Cultural Roots, and Colonial Rule: An Indic Musicologist Looks at the Muslim World,” Asian Music, vol. 12, no. 1, pp. 5–39, 1980, doi: 10.2307/833796.

K. Sudirga, H. Santosa, and D. Kustiyanti, “Jejak Karawitan dalam Kakawin Arjuna Wiwaha: Kajian Bentuk, Fungsi, dan Makna,” J. Hasil-Hasil Penelit. Inst. Seni Indones. Denpasar, vol. 3, no. 1, pp. 471–481, 2015.

J. Kunst, Hindu-Javanese musical instruments. Springer Science & Business Media, 2013.

Downloads

Published

2023-06-25

Issue

Section

Articles