Coexistence of particularity in the universality of musical sensation

Authors

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.33153/dewaruci.v19i1.5980

Keywords:

Musical Universality, Sensation Theory, Phenomenological Approach, Deleuze's Sensation Theory, Empirical Musical Experience

Abstract

This research is motivated by the debate about the issue of the universality of music. The question to be answered is, at what level does this aspect of musical universality emerge? This question is asked because, at a material level, it is clear that every piece of music is different and cannot be said to be the same, but at the same time, people tend to be able to enjoy music even if they don’t know the type or language of the music they are listening to, intuitively, unlike verbal language. Efforts to answer these questions bring this research under the qualitative umbrella with a phenomenological approach. In the context of this research, the issue of music is examined through the experience of musical sensations and reviewed using Deleuze’s theory of sensation. Data on musical sensation experiences was collected by conducting semi-structured interviews with five musicians from different genres, namely classical, jazz, pop, experimental and traditional. The research results show that the universality aspect of music is at the level of sensation, not sound material. In this case, sensation is only possible through empirical experience when people intensifically encounter sound material. This also shows that the term musical universality is not merely a metaphorical expression, but rather explains the existence of a coexistence relationship between musical material and sensation. So this finding can contribute to the need for the musician to think about performance strategies if they want to produce a universal sensation experience.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

D. W. Suci, “Manfaat Seni Musik Dalam Perkembangan Belajar Siswa Sekolah Dasar,” Edukatif J. Ilmu Pendidik., vol. 1, no. 3, pp. 177–184, Dec. 2019, doi: 10.31004/edukatif.v1i3.45.

T. J. Irawana and D. Desyandri, “Seni musik serta hubungan penggunaan pendidikan seni musik untuk membentuk karakter peserta didik di sekolah dasar,” Edukatif J. Ilmu Pendidik., vol. 1, no. 3, pp. 222–232, Dec. 2019, doi: 10.31004/edukatif.v1i3.47.

E. N. Alfionita, “Familiaritas musik dalam terapi pasien skizofrenia.” Institut Seni Indonesia Surakarta, 2019.

K. Sudirga, “Hibriditas Multidimensional: Studi Kasus Karya Musik Komunitas Badan Gila,” J. Music Sci. Technol. Ind., vol. 3, no. 1, pp. 43–56, Jan. 2020, doi: 10.31091/jomsti.v3i1.962.

A. Richards, “The universal language,” Conspec. Boreal., vol. 1, no. 1, p. 11, 2016.

L. B. Meyer, Emotion and meaning in music. University of chicago Press, 2008.

M. Solomos, “Timbre and Sound,” in The 3rd International Conference on Timbre, 2023.

H. Florian et al., “Deaf people feeling music rhythm by using a sensing and actuating device,” Sensors Actuators A Phys., vol. 267, pp. 431–442, Nov. 2017, doi: 10.1016/j.sna.2017.10.034.

J. Boss, “George Walker’s Piano Music: Traditional Forms in Tonal, Serial and Atonal Styles,” Music Theory Online, vol. 28, no. 3, Sep. 2022, doi: 10.30535/mto.28.3.2.

S. Amico, “‘We Are All Musicologists Now’; or, the End of Ethnomusicology,” J. Musicol., vol. 37, no. 1, pp. 1–32, Jan. 2020, doi: 10.1525/jm.2020.37.1.1.

N. Dave, “Music and the Myth of Universality: Sounding Human Rights and Capabilities,” J. Hum. Rights Pract., vol. 7, no. 1, pp. 1–17, Feb. 2015, doi: 10.1093/jhuman/huu025.

S. T. Sunardi, Vodka dan birahi seorang’nabi': esai-esai seni dan estetika. Jalasutra, 2012.

D. Smith, Essays on Deleuze. Edinburgh University Press, 2012. doi: 10.1515/9780748643349

G. Deleuze, “Desert islands: And other texts, 1953-1974,” 2004.

E. Husserl and W. R. B. Gibson, Ideas: general introduction to pure phenomenology. Collier Books New York, 1983.

B. E. Benson, “Phenomenology of music,” in The Routledge companion to philosophy and music, Routledge, 2011, pp. 581–591.

S. Brinkmann, Qualitative interviewing: Understanding qualitative research. Oxford University Press, 2013. doi: 10.1093/acprof:osobl/9780199861392.001.0001

S. Brinkmann and S. Kvale, Doing Interviews. 1 Oliver’s Yard, 55 City Road London EC1Y 1SP: SAGE Publications Ltd, 2018. doi: 10.4135/9781529716665

H. Henderson, “Difficult questions of difficult questions: the role of the researcher and transcription styles,” Int. J. Qual. Stud. Educ., vol. 31, no. 2, pp. 143–157, Feb. 2018, doi: 10.1080/09518398.2017.1379615.

S. Kowal and D. C. O’Connell, “Transcription as a Crucial Step of Data Analysis,” in The SAGE Handbook of Qualitative Data Analysis, 1 Oliver’s Yard, 55 City Road London EC1Y 1SP: SAGE Publications, Inc., 2014, pp. 64–78. doi: 10.4135/9781446282243.n5

M. B. Miles, A. M. Huberman, and J. Saldaña, Qualitative data analysis: A methods sourcebook. Sage publications, 2018.

G. Deleuze, “Bergson’s conception of difference,” New Bergson, pp. 42–65, 1999.

T. Perri, “Bergson’s Philosophy of Memory,” Philos. Compass, vol. 9, no. 12, pp. 837–847, Dec. 2014, doi: 10.1111/phc3.12179.

R. Okajima, “The Extensionalist View and Bergson’s Notion of Contraction,” in Bergson’s Scientific Metaphysics, Bloomsbury Academic, 2023, p. 213. doi: 10.5040/9781350342002.ch-015

B. Hulse, “On Bergson’s Concept of the Virtual,” Gamut Online J. Music Theory Soc. Mid-Atlantic, vol. 1, no. 1, p. 2, 2008.

Downloads

Published

2024-06-05

Issue

Section

Articles