Commodification and authenticity: a paradoxical paradigm of older and younger generations on the preservation of mask art in Bobung Yogyakarta
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.33153/dewaruci.v19i2.6255Keywords:
Preservation, Mask Art , Commodification , Authenticity, ParadoxicalAbstract
This study aims to examine the paradigms of the younger and older generations regarding the commodification process of mask art in Bobung, Yogyakarta. The research was conducted through a descriptive qualitative approach with a multiple case study design. Data sources included informants, locations, events, and documents/archives collected through in-depth interviews, participatory observation, and content analysis. Data validity was tested using triangulation techniques and informant reviews. Interactive data analysis techniques were employed, involving data reduction, data display, and verification stages. The study findings indicate that the older and younger generations have different perspectives on the preservation and inheritance of mask art in Bobung, Yogyakarta. The older generation believes that the effective preservation of mask art should not alter the cultural order inherited from ancestors over generations. The younger generation, on the other hand, views successful preservation of mask art as needing to adapt to the developments and demands of the times, thus requiring a commodification process. The opposing paradigms, both in practice and theory, can serve as references and foundations for society, academics, practitioners, and the government on how to preserve cultural arts in an ideal and sustainable manner.Downloads
References
[1] W. Purbonuswanto and M. Darmowiyono, “Penanaman nasionalisme melalui pembelajaran budaya lokal di sekolah dasar Solafide Semarang,” JPI (Jurnal Pendidik. Indones. J. Ilm. Pendidik., vol. 8, no. 1, pp. 1–8, Jun. 2022, doi: 10.20961/jpiuns.v8i1.62506.
[2] C. A. Cholik, “Perkembangan teknologi informasi komunikasi/ICT dalam berbagai bidang,” J. Fak. Tek. UNISA Kuningan, vol. 2, no. 2, pp. 39–46, 2021.
[3] S. H. Rayshantti, N. E. Pratama, and D. Prajarini, “Perancangan user interface game edukasi Topeng Panji sebagai media pelestarian kebudayaan,” Sungging, vol. 2, no. 2, pp. 217–238, Jan. 2024, doi: 10.21831/sungging.v2i2.70716.
[4] R. Minawati, “Komodifikasi: Manipulasi Budaya Dalam (Ajang) Pariwisata,” J. Ekspresi Seni, vol. 15, no. 1, pp. 117–127, 2013.
[5] I. W. Suteja and S. Wahyuningsih, “Invensi budaya kuliner melalui komodifikasi sebagai penunjang kegiatan pariwisata di kawasan wisata Mataram,” Media Bina Ilm., vol. 13, no. 7, pp. 1397–1404, 2019.
[6] I. W. Sugita and I. G. Tilem Pastika, “Inovasi Seni Pertunjukan Drama Gong Pada Era Digital,” Mudra J. Seni Budaya, vol. 36, no. 3, pp. 342–349, Aug. 2021, doi: 10.31091/mudra.v36i3.1492.
[7] N. Simbolon, N. K. Berutu, M. Afrizal, N. D. Al Fitri, T. A. Harefa, and S. F. Dalimunte, “Analisis pengaruh globalisasi dan media sosial terhadap minat tari tradisional di generasi muda,” MERDEKA J. Ilm. Multidisiplin, vol. 1, no. 5, pp. 367–371, 2024.
[8] A. P. S. Pratama, E. Susilowati, and P. Prananingtyas, “Upaya Pemerintah Daerah Kabupaten Tegal Dalam Rangka Melindungi Kesenian Tari Topeng Khas Kabupaten Tegal,” Diponegoro Law J., vol. 1, no. 4, pp. 1–8, 2012.
[9] N. Rochmat, “Pewarisan Tari Topeng Gaya Dermayon: Studi Kasus Gaya Rasinah,” Resital J. Seni Pertunjuk., vol. 14, no. 1, pp. 33–40, Sep. 2013, doi: 10.24821/resital.v14i1.393.
[10] S. Yanuartuti, “Building Creative Art Product in Jombang Regency by Conserving Mask Puppet,” Harmon. J. Arts Res. Educ., vol. 16, no. 1, pp. 30–37, Dec. 2016, doi: 10.15294/harmonia.v16i1.6148.
[11] E. W. Suprihatin and D. Pratamawati, “Conservation Strategy in Preserving The Local Image Existence of Wayang Topeng,” Harmon. J. Arts Res. Educ., vol. 19, no. 2, pp. 179–184, Dec. 2019, doi: 10.15294/harmonia.v19i2.24005.
[12] I. K. Rizqi and B. H. Putra, “Upaya Pelestarian Tari Topeng Klana di Desa Slarang Lor Kecamatan Dukuhwaru Kabupaten Tegal,” J. Seni Tari, vol. 9, no. 2, pp. 129–139, 2020.
[13] I. W. Dana, “Art Conservation for the Classical Masks at Sonobudoyo Museum, Yogyakarta,” J. Urban Soc. Arts, vol. 8, no. 1, pp. 61–68, Jun. 2021, doi: 10.24821/jousa.v8i1.4629.
[14] R. J. Nurcahyo and Y. Yulianto, “Upaya Pelestarian Topeng Warno Waskito di Diro Pendowoharjo Sewon Bantul Yogyakarta,” Khasanah Ilmu - J. Pariwisata Dan Budaya, vol. 12, no. 1, pp. 49–56, Mar. 2021, doi: 10.31294/khi.v12i1.10304.
[15] F. Alfarisi, “Peranan Perempuan dalam Melestarikan Kesenian Tari Topeng Cirebon Gaya Slangit,” J. Iman dan Spiritualitas, vol. 2, no. 3, pp. 437–442, Aug. 2022, doi: 10.15575/jis.v2i3.18854.
[16] Nasution, Metode penelitian naturalistik kualitatif. Bandung: Tarsito, 2003.
[17] Genik Puji Yuhanda, “Pesan Dalam Tarian Topeng Panji Cirebon,” KOMVERSAL, vol. 1, no. 1, pp. 1–21, Feb. 2019, doi: 10.38204/komversal.v1i1.126.
[18] D. Yanuar and A. R. Mulyana, “Interaksi musikal dalam pertunjukan Kesenian Topeng Betawi,” Dewa Ruci J. Pengkaj. dan Pencipta. Seni, vol. 14, no. 1, pp. 10–18, Jul. 2019, doi: 10.33153/dewaruci.v14i1.2532.
[19] D. M. I. Fitriawati, I. A. K. Dewi, G. A. M. Diana, and I. B. G. N. Winarta, “Upaya melestarikan tarian tradisional di era modern,” in Prosiding Pekan Ilmiah Pelajar (PILAR), 2023, vol. 3, pp. 78–88.
[20] T. Saumantri, “Makna ritus dalam tari topeng Cirebon,” SOSFILKOM J. Sos. Filsafat dan Komun., vol. 16, no. 01, pp. 32–41, Jul. 2022, doi: 10.32534/jsfk.v16i01.2577.
[21] Y. Nurhidayah, “Revitalisasi Kesenian Tari Topeng sebagai Media Dakwah,” Ilmu Dakwah Acad. J. Homilet. Stud., vol. 11, no. 1, pp. 21–52, Jun. 2017, doi: 10.15575/idajhs.v11i1.1526.
[22] A. T. Barunawati and S. A. Paturusi, “Pengembangan daya tarik wisata budaya Desa Slangit, Cirebon, Jawa Barat,” J. Master Pariwisata, vol. 2, no. 2, pp. 95–110, Jan. 2016, doi: 10.24843/JUMPA.2016.v02.i02.p06.
[23] N. Nurasih, “Proses Pewarisan Dalang Topeng Cirebon,” J. Seni Makalangan, vol. 1, no. 1, pp. 25–36, 2014.
[24] U. Djuhara, “Pergeseran Fungsi Seni Tari sebagai Upaya Pengembangan dan Pelestarian Kebudayaan,” J. Seni Makalangan, vol. 1, no. 2, 2014.
[25] Y. S. Wijaya, “Nilai Karakter pada Struktur Simbolis Visual Topeng Panji Gaya Yogyakarta,” Gelar J. Seni Budaya, vol. 18, no. 1, pp. 52–60, Jul. 2020, doi: 10.33153/glr.v18i1.2772.
[26] K. W. Darmojo, “Tinjauan semiotika terhadapeksistensi keris dalam budaya Jawa,” Brikolase J. Kaji. Teor. Prakt. dan Wacana Seni Budaya Rupa, vol. 8, no. 2, pp. 66–82, 2016.
[27] M. Jazuli, S. MD, and L. Paranti, “Bentuk dan Gaya Kesenian Barongan Blora,” Dewa Ruci J. Pengkaj. dan Pencipta. Seni, vol. 15, no. 1, pp. 12–19, Sep. 2020, doi: 10.33153/dewaruci.v15i1.2892.
[28] I. Sadiyah and B. Suharjana, “Pandangan Masyarakat terhadap Kehadiran Penari Topeng Putri dalam Upacara Adat Ngarot di Desa Jambak Kecamatan Lelea Kabupaten Indramayu,” J. Seni Tari, vol. 9, no. 2, pp. 121–128, 2020.
[29] U. H. Lubis and A. A. Azhar, “Trend Library Cafe dalam Mendukung Budaya Minat Baca Generasi Muda,” J. Educ. Res., vol. 4, no. 2, pp. 732–741, 2023.
[30] S. Subiyantoro, M. Mulyanto, and Y. S. Wijaya, “Peranan Perempuan Dibalik Eksistensi Topeng Klasik dan Kreasi Yang Mendunia: Studi Kasus Desa Wisata Budaya Bobung, Gunung Kidul, Yogyakarta,” Jantra., vol. 15, no. 2, pp. 109–122, Dec. 2020, doi: 10.52829/jantra.v15i2.138.
[31] T. Agusta, W. Warto, and S. Supana, “Dampak Komodifikasi Terhadap Perubahan Identitas Tari Topeng Hitam,” Haluan Sastra Budaya, vol. 1, no. 2, pp. 210–221, Jan. 2018, doi: 10.20961/hsb.v1i2.11274.
[32] Y. S. Wijaya, S. Subiyantoro, and L. Hartono, “Kajian Nilai Pendidikan Karakter dalam Simbolisme Visual Topeng Panji & Relevansinya pada Pembelajaran Apresiasi Seni Rupa di SMA,” J. Kaji. Seni, vol. 5, no. 1, p. 45, Dec. 2019, doi: 10.22146/jksks.41883.
[33] I. Ismail, “Media Adaptation of Mask Making in Malang: Study of Functional and Process for Making Fiber Masks,” Dewa Ruci J. Pengkaj. dan Pencipta. Seni, vol. 16, no. 2, pp. 98–104, Dec. 2021, doi: 10.33153/dewaruci.v16i2.3318.
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2024 Slamet Subiyantoro, Yasin Surya Wijaya, Kristiani, Dwi Maryono
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
License and Copyright Agreement
In submitting the manuscript to the journal, the authors certify that:
- They are authorized by their co-authors to enter into these arrangements.
- The work described has not been formally published before, except in the form of an abstract or as part of a published lecture, review, thesis, or overlay journal. Please also carefully read Dewa Ruci's Posting Your Article Policy at https://jurnal.isi-ska.ac.id/index.php/dewaruci/about/editorialPolicies#peerReviewProcess
- That it is not under consideration for publication elsewhere,
- That its publication has been approved by all the author(s) and by the responsible authorities – tacitly or explicitly – of the institutes where the work has been carried out.
- They secure the right to reproduce any material that has already been published or copyrighted elsewhere.
- They agree to the following license and copyright agreement.
Copyright
Authors who publish with Dewa Ruci: Jurnal Pengkajian dan Penciptaan Seni agree to the following terms:
- Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY-SA 4.0) that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgment of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgment of its initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work.
Licensing for Data Publication
Dewa Ruci: Jurnal Pengkajian dan Penciptaan Seni use a variety of waivers and licenses, that are specifically designed for and appropriate for the treatment of data:
Open Data Commons Attribution License, http://www.opendatacommons.org/licenses/by/1.0/ (default)
Creative Commons CC-Zero Waiver, http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/
Open Data Commons Public Domain Dedication and Licence, http://www.opendatacommons.org/licenses/pddl/1-0/
Other data publishing licenses may be allowed as exceptions (subject to approval by the editor on a case-by-case basis) and should be justified with a written statement from the author, which will be published with the article.
Open Data and Software Publishing and Sharing
The journal strives to maximize the replicability of the research published in it. Authors are thus required to share all data, code or protocols underlying the research reported in their articles. Exceptions are permitted but have to be justified in a written public statement accompanying the article.
Datasets and software should be deposited and permanently archived inappropriate, trusted, general, or domain-specific repositories (please consult http://service.re3data.org and/or software repositories such as GitHub, GitLab, Bioinformatics.org, or equivalent). The associated persistent identifiers (e.g. DOI, or others) of the dataset(s) must be included in the data or software resources section of the article. Reference(s) to datasets and software should also be included in the reference list of the article with DOIs (where available). Where no domain-specific data repository exists, authors should deposit their datasets in a general repository such as ZENODO, Dryad, Dataverse, or others.
Small data may also be published as data files or packages supplementary to a research article, however, the authors should prefer in all cases a deposition in data repositories.
