Commodification and authenticity: a paradoxical paradigm of older and younger generations on the preservation of mask art in Bobung Yogyakarta
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.33153/dewaruci.v19i2.6255Keywords:
Preservation, Mask Art , Commodification , Authenticity, ParadoxicalAbstract
This study aims to examine the paradigms of the younger and older generations regarding the commodification process of mask art in Bobung, Yogyakarta. The research was conducted through a descriptive qualitative approach with a multiple case study design. Data sources included informants, locations, events, and documents/archives collected through in-depth interviews, participatory observation, and content analysis. Data validity was tested using triangulation techniques and informant reviews. Interactive data analysis techniques were employed, involving data reduction, data display, and verification stages. The study findings indicate that the older and younger generations have different perspectives on the preservation and inheritance of mask art in Bobung, Yogyakarta. The older generation believes that the effective preservation of mask art should not alter the cultural order inherited from ancestors over generations. The younger generation, on the other hand, views successful preservation of mask art as needing to adapt to the developments and demands of the times, thus requiring a commodification process. The opposing paradigms, both in practice and theory, can serve as references and foundations for society, academics, practitioners, and the government on how to preserve cultural arts in an ideal and sustainable manner.Downloads
References
[1] W. Purbonuswanto and M. Darmowiyono, “Penanaman nasionalisme melalui pembelajaran budaya lokal di sekolah dasar Solafide Semarang,” JPI (Jurnal Pendidik. Indones. J. Ilm. Pendidik., vol. 8, no. 1, pp. 1–8, Jun. 2022, doi: 10.20961/jpiuns.v8i1.62506.
[2] C. A. Cholik, “Perkembangan teknologi informasi komunikasi/ICT dalam berbagai bidang,” J. Fak. Tek. UNISA Kuningan, vol. 2, no. 2, pp. 39–46, 2021.
[3] S. H. Rayshantti, N. E. Pratama, and D. Prajarini, “Perancangan user interface game edukasi Topeng Panji sebagai media pelestarian kebudayaan,” Sungging, vol. 2, no. 2, pp. 217–238, Jan. 2024, doi: 10.21831/sungging.v2i2.70716.
[4] R. Minawati, “Komodifikasi: Manipulasi Budaya Dalam (Ajang) Pariwisata,” J. Ekspresi Seni, vol. 15, no. 1, pp. 117–127, 2013.
[5] I. W. Suteja and S. Wahyuningsih, “Invensi budaya kuliner melalui komodifikasi sebagai penunjang kegiatan pariwisata di kawasan wisata Mataram,” Media Bina Ilm., vol. 13, no. 7, pp. 1397–1404, 2019.
[6] I. W. Sugita and I. G. Tilem Pastika, “Inovasi Seni Pertunjukan Drama Gong Pada Era Digital,” Mudra J. Seni Budaya, vol. 36, no. 3, pp. 342–349, Aug. 2021, doi: 10.31091/mudra.v36i3.1492.
[7] N. Simbolon, N. K. Berutu, M. Afrizal, N. D. Al Fitri, T. A. Harefa, and S. F. Dalimunte, “Analisis pengaruh globalisasi dan media sosial terhadap minat tari tradisional di generasi muda,” MERDEKA J. Ilm. Multidisiplin, vol. 1, no. 5, pp. 367–371, 2024.
[8] A. P. S. Pratama, E. Susilowati, and P. Prananingtyas, “Upaya Pemerintah Daerah Kabupaten Tegal Dalam Rangka Melindungi Kesenian Tari Topeng Khas Kabupaten Tegal,” Diponegoro Law J., vol. 1, no. 4, pp. 1–8, 2012.
[9] N. Rochmat, “Pewarisan Tari Topeng Gaya Dermayon: Studi Kasus Gaya Rasinah,” Resital J. Seni Pertunjuk., vol. 14, no. 1, pp. 33–40, Sep. 2013, doi: 10.24821/resital.v14i1.393.
[10] S. Yanuartuti, “Building Creative Art Product in Jombang Regency by Conserving Mask Puppet,” Harmon. J. Arts Res. Educ., vol. 16, no. 1, pp. 30–37, Dec. 2016, doi: 10.15294/harmonia.v16i1.6148.
[11] E. W. Suprihatin and D. Pratamawati, “Conservation Strategy in Preserving The Local Image Existence of Wayang Topeng,” Harmon. J. Arts Res. Educ., vol. 19, no. 2, pp. 179–184, Dec. 2019, doi: 10.15294/harmonia.v19i2.24005.
[12] I. K. Rizqi and B. H. Putra, “Upaya Pelestarian Tari Topeng Klana di Desa Slarang Lor Kecamatan Dukuhwaru Kabupaten Tegal,” J. Seni Tari, vol. 9, no. 2, pp. 129–139, 2020.
[13] I. W. Dana, “Art Conservation for the Classical Masks at Sonobudoyo Museum, Yogyakarta,” J. Urban Soc. Arts, vol. 8, no. 1, pp. 61–68, Jun. 2021, doi: 10.24821/jousa.v8i1.4629.
[14] R. J. Nurcahyo and Y. Yulianto, “Upaya Pelestarian Topeng Warno Waskito di Diro Pendowoharjo Sewon Bantul Yogyakarta,” Khasanah Ilmu - J. Pariwisata Dan Budaya, vol. 12, no. 1, pp. 49–56, Mar. 2021, doi: 10.31294/khi.v12i1.10304.
[15] F. Alfarisi, “Peranan Perempuan dalam Melestarikan Kesenian Tari Topeng Cirebon Gaya Slangit,” J. Iman dan Spiritualitas, vol. 2, no. 3, pp. 437–442, Aug. 2022, doi: 10.15575/jis.v2i3.18854.
[16] Nasution, Metode penelitian naturalistik kualitatif. Bandung: Tarsito, 2003.
[17] Genik Puji Yuhanda, “Pesan Dalam Tarian Topeng Panji Cirebon,” KOMVERSAL, vol. 1, no. 1, pp. 1–21, Feb. 2019, doi: 10.38204/komversal.v1i1.126.
[18] D. Yanuar and A. R. Mulyana, “Interaksi musikal dalam pertunjukan Kesenian Topeng Betawi,” Dewa Ruci J. Pengkaj. dan Pencipta. Seni, vol. 14, no. 1, pp. 10–18, Jul. 2019, doi: 10.33153/dewaruci.v14i1.2532.
[19] D. M. I. Fitriawati, I. A. K. Dewi, G. A. M. Diana, and I. B. G. N. Winarta, “Upaya melestarikan tarian tradisional di era modern,” in Prosiding Pekan Ilmiah Pelajar (PILAR), 2023, vol. 3, pp. 78–88.
[20] T. Saumantri, “Makna ritus dalam tari topeng Cirebon,” SOSFILKOM J. Sos. Filsafat dan Komun., vol. 16, no. 01, pp. 32–41, Jul. 2022, doi: 10.32534/jsfk.v16i01.2577.
[21] Y. Nurhidayah, “Revitalisasi Kesenian Tari Topeng sebagai Media Dakwah,” Ilmu Dakwah Acad. J. Homilet. Stud., vol. 11, no. 1, pp. 21–52, Jun. 2017, doi: 10.15575/idajhs.v11i1.1526.
[22] A. T. Barunawati and S. A. Paturusi, “Pengembangan daya tarik wisata budaya Desa Slangit, Cirebon, Jawa Barat,” J. Master Pariwisata, vol. 2, no. 2, pp. 95–110, Jan. 2016, doi: 10.24843/JUMPA.2016.v02.i02.p06.
[23] N. Nurasih, “Proses Pewarisan Dalang Topeng Cirebon,” J. Seni Makalangan, vol. 1, no. 1, pp. 25–36, 2014.
[24] U. Djuhara, “Pergeseran Fungsi Seni Tari sebagai Upaya Pengembangan dan Pelestarian Kebudayaan,” J. Seni Makalangan, vol. 1, no. 2, 2014.
[25] Y. S. Wijaya, “Nilai Karakter pada Struktur Simbolis Visual Topeng Panji Gaya Yogyakarta,” Gelar J. Seni Budaya, vol. 18, no. 1, pp. 52–60, Jul. 2020, doi: 10.33153/glr.v18i1.2772.
[26] K. W. Darmojo, “Tinjauan semiotika terhadapeksistensi keris dalam budaya Jawa,” Brikolase J. Kaji. Teor. Prakt. dan Wacana Seni Budaya Rupa, vol. 8, no. 2, pp. 66–82, 2016.
[27] M. Jazuli, S. MD, and L. Paranti, “Bentuk dan Gaya Kesenian Barongan Blora,” Dewa Ruci J. Pengkaj. dan Pencipta. Seni, vol. 15, no. 1, pp. 12–19, Sep. 2020, doi: 10.33153/dewaruci.v15i1.2892.
[28] I. Sadiyah and B. Suharjana, “Pandangan Masyarakat terhadap Kehadiran Penari Topeng Putri dalam Upacara Adat Ngarot di Desa Jambak Kecamatan Lelea Kabupaten Indramayu,” J. Seni Tari, vol. 9, no. 2, pp. 121–128, 2020.
[29] U. H. Lubis and A. A. Azhar, “Trend Library Cafe dalam Mendukung Budaya Minat Baca Generasi Muda,” J. Educ. Res., vol. 4, no. 2, pp. 732–741, 2023.
[30] S. Subiyantoro, M. Mulyanto, and Y. S. Wijaya, “Peranan Perempuan Dibalik Eksistensi Topeng Klasik dan Kreasi Yang Mendunia: Studi Kasus Desa Wisata Budaya Bobung, Gunung Kidul, Yogyakarta,” Jantra., vol. 15, no. 2, pp. 109–122, Dec. 2020, doi: 10.52829/jantra.v15i2.138.
[31] T. Agusta, W. Warto, and S. Supana, “Dampak Komodifikasi Terhadap Perubahan Identitas Tari Topeng Hitam,” Haluan Sastra Budaya, vol. 1, no. 2, pp. 210–221, Jan. 2018, doi: 10.20961/hsb.v1i2.11274.
[32] Y. S. Wijaya, S. Subiyantoro, and L. Hartono, “Kajian Nilai Pendidikan Karakter dalam Simbolisme Visual Topeng Panji & Relevansinya pada Pembelajaran Apresiasi Seni Rupa di SMA,” J. Kaji. Seni, vol. 5, no. 1, p. 45, Dec. 2019, doi: 10.22146/jksks.41883.
[33] I. Ismail, “Media Adaptation of Mask Making in Malang: Study of Functional and Process for Making Fiber Masks,” Dewa Ruci J. Pengkaj. dan Pencipta. Seni, vol. 16, no. 2, pp. 98–104, Dec. 2021, doi: 10.33153/dewaruci.v16i2.3318.
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2024 Slamet Subiyantoro, Yasin Surya Wijaya, Kristiani, Dwi Maryono
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
Authors who publish in Dewa Ruci: Jurnal Pengkajian dan Penciptaan Seni agree to the following terms:
- Authors retain copyright and grant the Dewa Ruci: Jurnal Pengkajian dan Penciptaan Seni right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY-SA 4.0) that allows others to share (copy and redistribute the material in any medium or format) and adapt (remix, transform, and build upon the material) the work for any purpose, even commercially with an acknowledgment of the work's authorship and initial publication in Dewa Ruci: Jurnal Pengkajian dan Penciptaan Seni.
- Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgment of its initial publication in Dewa Ruci: Jurnal Pengkajian dan Penciptaan Seni.
- Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work (See The Effect of Open Access).
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License
