Analysis of symbolic meaning as an expression of Malay cultural values in the Malay ornaments of the Asserayah Al-Hasyimiyah palace, Siak Sri Indrapura Regency

Authors

  • Hengki Satria Universitas Islam Riau, Marpoyan Damai, Pekanbaru, Riau
  • Fatia Kurniati Universitas Islam Riau, Marpoyan Damai, Pekanbaru, Riau
  • M Azam Hadi Universitas Islam Riau, Marpoyan Damai, Pekanbaru, Riau

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.33153/dewaruci.v19i2.6440

Keywords:

Symbolic meaning, Expression of Malay cultural , Malay ornaments, the Asserayah Al-Hasyimiyah Palace

Abstract

This study analyzes the Malay ornaments in the Asserayah Al-Hasyimiyah Palace, Siak Sri Indrapura Regency, to uncover their visual forms and symbolic meanings. A qualitative descriptive approach combined with semiotic methods was employed to understand these ornaments' artistic elements, functions, and cultural values. The findings reveal that the palace's ornaments feature various motifs, including flora (jasmine, ylang-ylang, roses), fauna (dragon heads), Arabic calligraphy, and geometric patterns. Each ornament carries symbolic meanings that reflect Malay cultural values, such as honesty (mangosteen tree), noble character (a cluster of garden flowers), and honor (wall crown). Beyond their decorative function, these ornaments also serve as a medium of visual communication that embodies Malay cultural identity. This study underscores the importance of preserving traditional ornaments as cultural heritage while enhancing public understanding of Malay art. These findings are relevant for supporting arts and cultural education and enriching studies on traditional architecture.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

[1] A. Alsia and I. W. Suardana, “Interpretation of the Ornaments of the Masjid Agung Pondok Tinggi, Sungai Penuh using Charles Sanders Pierce’s Semiotic Approach,” Int. J. Multicult. Multireligious Underst., vol. 10, no. 11, pp. 107–115, 2023, doi: 10.18415/ijmmu.v10i11.5245.

[2] K. Budiman, “Semiotika visual, Buku Baik,” Buku Baik dan Yayasan Seni Cemeti. Yogyakarta, 2003.

[3] A. A. Yussupova, L. Songfu, A. Namazbay, F. P. Rahimian, and A. Nejad Ebrahim, “Ornamental art and symbolism: activators of historical regeneration for Kazakhstan’s landscape architecture,” Int. J. Archit. Res. ArchNet-IJAR, vol. 11, no. 3, p. 193, 2017, doi: 10.26687/archnet-ijar.v11i3.1358.

[4] M. Womack, Symbols and meaning: A concise introduction. Rowman Altamira, 2005.

[5] W. Nöth, “The semiotics of teaching and the teaching of semiotics,” in Semiotics education experience, Brill, 2010, pp. 1–19, doi : 10.1163/9789460912252_002.

[6] R. H. I. Sitindjak, L. K. Wardani, and D. Thamrin, “Form and meaning of Batak Toba house ornaments,” Adv. Sci. Lett., vol. 22, no. 12, pp. 4050–4053, 2016, doi: 10.1166/asl.2016.8170.

[7] T. A. Sebeok, Signs: An introduction to semiotics. University of Toronto Press, 2001.

[8] B. Mudjiyanto and E. Nur, “Semiotics In Research Method of Communication [Semiotika Dalam Metode Penelitian Komunikasi],” J. Pekommas, vol. 16, no. 1, pp. 73–82, 2013.

[9] A. F. Pondaag, “Analisis Semiotika Iklan A Mild Go Ahead Versi ‘Dorong Bangunan’ Di Televisi,” Acta Diurna Komun., vol. 2, no. 1, 2013.

[10] hasri Habsari, “Membaca simbol-simbol komunikasi dan budaya pada bangunan cagar budaya dengan analisa semiotika roland barthes,” vol. 3, pp. 159–168, 2015.

[11] H. Riley, “Visual art and social structure : the social semiotics of relational art,” vol. 12, no. 2, pp. 207–216, 2013, doi: 10.1177/1470357212471595.

[12] A. Harisah and Z. Masiming, “Persepsi manusia terhadap tanda,simbol dan spasial,” SMARTek, vol. 6, no. 1 Februari, pp. 29–43, 2008.

[13] M. Danesi, “Pesan, tanda, dan makna,” Yogyakarta: Jalasutra, 2010.

[14] S. Handayani, “Rekonstruksi Kata Ambyar ditinjau dari Pergeseran Struktur dan Semantik,” Artik. J. Pendidik. Bhs. dan Sastra Indones., vol. 2, no. 1, pp. 52–60, doi : 10.17509/artikulasi.v2i1.68463.

[15] A. Liliweri, Makna budaya dalam komunikasi antarbudaya. Lkis pelangi aksara, 2003.

[16] H. A. Sihabudin, Komunikasi antarbudaya: Satu perspektif multidimensi. Bumi Aksara, 2022.

[17] D. S. I. B. Padang, “Etika Komunikasi Dalam Reformasi Pelayanan Sipil & Publik (Tinjauan Teori) Emi Handrina”.

[18] A. Radvánszky, “The semiotic perspectives of the symbol,” TRANS-. Rev. littérature générale comparée, no. 10, 2010, doi: 10.4000/trans.405.

[19] A. Romdhoni, Semiotik Metodologi Penelitian. Literatur Nusantara, 2019.

[20] R. Pandiyan and P. Arangasamy, “Semiotics: A literary genre universal,” Criterion, vol. 5, no. 2, pp. 378–383, 2014.

[21] M. H. Hashim, A. M. Z. Ahmad, M. P. A. Latif, and M. Y. M. Yunos, “Visual communication of the traditional house in Negeri Sembilan,” Humanit. Soc. Sci. Rev., vol. 5, no. 2, pp. 112–123, 2017, doi: 10.18510/hssr.2018.527a.

[22] B. W. Furidha, “Comprehension of the Descriptive Qualitative Research Method: A Critical Assessment of the Literature,” Acitya Wisesa J. Multidiscip. Res., pp. 1–8, 2023, doi: 10.56943/jmr.v2i4.443.

[23] B. V Seixas, N. Smith, and C. Mitton, “The qualitative descriptive approach in international comparative studies: Using online qualitative surveys,” Int. J. Heal. policy Manag., vol. 7, no. 9, p. 778, 2017, doi: 10.15171/ijhpm.2017.142.

[24] J. N. Erzen, “Reading mosques: Meaning and architecture in Islam,” J. Aesthet. art Crit., vol. 69, no. 1, pp. 125–131, 2011, doi: 10.1111/j.1540-6245.2010.01453.x.

[25] U. Uzrina, F. Izzati, and P. Dahlia, “The symbolism of Sultanah Nahrasyiah tombstone ornaments: an analysis of cultural identity and Islamic influence in tomb structure,” Elegentia IAS J. Arts, Media, Technol., vol. 1, no. 2, pp. 12–24, 2024.

[26] Z. Kamarudin, P. S. J. Kassim, and A. Abdullah, “The variants and meanings of Malay motif ornamentation in the urban context: A case study of Putrajaya,” Plan. Malaysia, vol. 18, 2020, doi: 10.21837/pm.v18i12.756.

[27] I. Abdul Halim Choo, M. S. Abdul Rashid, and N. H. Jamaludin, “Malay aesthetic principles in the roof decorative architectural components of Rumah Limas Bumbung Perak,” Int. J. Art Des., vol. 8, no. 1 SI 1, pp. 16–31, 2024, doi: 10.24191/ijad.v8i1/SI-1.2516.

[28] R. S. Mahmood and O. Q. A. Alchalabi, “The importance of classifying the traditional Mosulian ornaments in enhancing the conservation process,” Planning, vol. 17, no. 5, pp. 1605–1613, 2022, doi: 10.18280/ijsdp.170525.

[29] I. W. Sudana, T. S. Suparno, and G. Dharsono, “Aesthetic Values of Ornaments in Karawo Textile in Gorontalo,” Arts Des. Stud., vol. 68, pp. 1–9, 2018, doi: 10.2991/reka-18.2018.27.

[30] A. Murdihastomo, “Iconography analysis of flower and animal ornaments on the prabhamandala of Shiva statue of the National Museum Indonesia: Analisis ikonografi ornamen bunga dan binatang pada prabhamandala arca Siwa koleksi Museum Nasional Indonesia,” Berk. Arkeol., vol. 41, no. 2, pp. 177–194, 2021, doi: 10.30883/jba.v41i2.621.

Downloads

Published

2024-12-26

Issue

Vol. 19 No. 2 (2024)

Section

Articles

License

Copyright (c) 2024 Hengki Satria, Fatia Kurniati , M Azam Hadi

Creative Commons License

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.

Authors who publish in Dewa Ruci: Jurnal Pengkajian dan Penciptaan Seni agree to the following terms:

  1. Authors retain copyright and grant the Dewa Ruci: Jurnal Pengkajian dan Penciptaan Seni right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY-SA 4.0) that allows others to share (copy and redistribute the material in any medium or format) and adapt (remix, transform, and build upon the material) the work for any purpose, even commercially with an acknowledgment of the work's authorship and initial publication in Dewa Ruci: Jurnal Pengkajian dan Penciptaan Seni.
  2. Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgment of its initial publication in Dewa Ruci: Jurnal Pengkajian dan Penciptaan Seni.
  3. Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work (See The Effect of Open Access).

    Lisensi Creative Commons

    This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License