“God Or Idol?” research exploration of AI idolization awareness in poster design

Main Article Content

Andreas James Darmawan
Sugiyanto Sugiyanto
Putri Karin Cinthya
Sitinjak Eunike Yolanda Zefanya

Abstract

Study aims to explore how poster design can be utilized as a medium for critical reflection on the relationship between humans and artificial intelligence (AI). Using Research Through Design approach, study developed and compared two poster concepts: collaborative human–AI poster and provocative AI-idolization poster. Began with poster creation which is conveying message regarding the position of AI and humans. Poster with knowledge tree theme was chosen to represent harmony between organic and technological elements. This poster depicts humans and AI sitting side by side under tree with circuit-shaped roots, symbolizing synergy and connectedness. However, despite aesthetic and communicative, this visual model has widely used, resulting in weak awareness effect, audiences accustomed to similar metaphors. As alternative, second approach taken, creating quirky poster that combines religious figure with robotic elements as AI modern idol. This provocative visual creates shock awareness, forcing audiences consider position of AI, whether read as colleague or excessively glorified. Using qualitative approach with descriptive methods, results confirm that AI ​​goddess poster is more effective in raising critical awareness than tree poster. Through visual rhetoric and semiotic analysis, findings suggest that unconventional visual metaphors have greater potential to stimulate critical reflection regarding AI position in contemporary society.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Article Details

Section
Articles

References

[1] Y. Li, “Impact of Artificial Intelligence on Creative Digital Content Production,” Journal of Digital Art Engineering and Multimedia, vol. 6, no. 2, pp. 121–132, Dec. 2019, doi: 10.29056/jdaem.2019.12.05.

[2] N. Anantrasirichai and D. Bull, “Artificial intelligence in the creative industries: a review,” Artif. Intell. Rev., vol. 55, no. 1, pp. 589–656, Jan. 2022, doi: 10.1007/s10462-021-10039-7.

[3] S. Hemraj, “AI and the future of creative development: redefining digital media production,” AI and Ethics, vol. 5, no. 5, pp. 5105–5119, Oct. 2025, doi: 10.1007/s43681-025-00765-x.

[4] A. J. Darmawan, I. M. G. Arimbawa, A. Heptariza, and H. Brayen, “Harnessing Ai Image Generator Prompt Engineering For Academic Excellence,” Proceeding Bali-Bhuwana Waskita: Global Art Creativity Conference, vol. 4, pp. 192–202, Dec. 2024, doi: 10.31091/bbwp.v4i1.478.

[5] E. Bryndin, “Creative Communication Safe Ethical Artificial Intelligence in the Era of Technological Development,” Software Engineering, vol. 8, no. 3, p. 13, 2020, doi: 10.11648/j.se.20200803.11.

[6] A. Nasser and E. Erafy, “Applications of Artificial Intelligence in the field of media,” International Journal of Artificial Intelligence and Emerging Technology, vol. 2, 2023.

[7] W. Ge and G. Hou, “The effects of generative AI model type and visual stimuli type on design creativity,” Artificial Intelligence for Engineering Design, Analysis and Manufacturing, vol. 39, p. e17, Jul. 2025, doi: 10.1017/S0890060425100061.

[8] L. Wen, W. Jingjing, W. Chen, and S. Luyu, “Research on the Visual Imagery of Posters Based on the Culture Code Theory of Design,” Front. Psychol., vol. 13, Jun. 2022, doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2022.861366.

[9] Y. Yang, “A Study of Creative Imagery in Public Service Posters Based on Design Cultural Codes Theory,” Advances in Humanities Research, vol. 2, no. 1, pp. 47–55, Sep. 2023, doi: 10.54254/2753-7080/2/2023012.

[10] G. Amato et al., “AI in the media and creative industries,” May 2019, Accessed: Oct. 22, 2025. [Online]. Available: http://arxiv.org/abs/1905.04175

[11] M. Yadav, M. Kumar, A. Sahoo, and M. S. H. Rathnasiri, “AI and the Evolution of Artistic Expression,” 2024, pp. 15–36. doi: 10.4018/979-8-3693-3916-9.ch002.

[12] D. Gunkel and D. J. Gunkel, “Communication and Artificial Intelligence: Opportunities and Challenges for the 21st Century,” vol. 1, 2012, doi: 10.7275/R5QJ7F7R.

[13] J. Zimmerman, E. Stolterman, and J. Forlizzi, “An analysis and critique of Research through Design,” in Proceedings of the 8th ACM Conference on Designing Interactive Systems, New York, NY, USA: ACM, Aug. 2010, pp. 310–319. doi: 10.1145/1858171.1858228.

[14] M. Danesi, “Visual Rhetoric and Semiotic,” in Oxford Research Encyclopedia of Communication, Oxford University PressNew York, NY, 2017. doi: 10.1093/acrefore/9780190228613.013.43.

[15] B. Kinnear, A. Martini, L. Varpio, E. W. Driessen, and D. J. Schumacher, “How do validity experts conceptualise argumentation? It’s a rhetorical question,” Med. Educ., vol. 58, no. 8, pp. 989–997, Aug. 2024, doi: 10.1111/medu.15311.

[16] F. Vinchon et al., “Artificial Intelligence & Creativity: A Manifesto for Collaboration,” Dec. 01, 2023, John Wiley and Sons Inc. doi: 10.1002/jocb.597.

[17] Z. Wu, D. Ji, K. Yu, X. Zeng, D. Wu, and M. Shidujaman, “AI Creativity and the Human-AI Co-creation Model,” in Lecture Notes in Computer Science (including subseries Lecture Notes in Artificial Intelligence and Lecture Notes in Bioinformatics), Springer Science and Business Media Deutschland GmbH, 2021, pp. 171–190. doi: 10.1007/978-3-030-78462-1_13.

[18] J. McCormack, P. Hutchings, T. Gifford, M. Yee-King, M. T. Llano, and M. D’inverno, “Design Considerations for Real-Time Collaboration With Creative Artificial Intelligence,” 2020.

[19] I. Ikram and B. Othman, “Human-AI Collaboration: Enhancing Creativity and Productivity in the Digital Age”.

[20] S. Helou and D. Alper, “Prompt Engineering for Artificial Intelligence-Based Visual Design Tools: A Study of Generative Systems,” AI & Design Journal, vol. 14, no. 2, pp. 123–138, 2021.

[21] B. Mahmud, G. Hong, and B. Fong, “A Study of Human-AI Symbiosis for Creative Work: Recent Developments and Future Directions in Deep Learning,” ACM Transactions on Multimedia Computing, Communications and Applications, vol. 20, no. 2, Sep. 2023, doi: 10.1145/3542698.

[22] R. H. Palmer, “Style in Lighting Design,” Educational Theatre Journal, vol. 19, no. 2, p. 142, May 1967, doi: 10.2307/3205138.

[23] İ. Yılmaz and G. Koç, “Analysis of Human Rights-Themed Posters Using a Semiotic Approach: A Review of the Trposter Exhibition,” Online Journal of Art and Design, vol. 14, no. 1, pp. 117–129, Jan. 2026, doi: 10.30935/ojad/2513080.

[24] R. Adiansyah, A. Sofia, M. Bensar, A. Adams, and M. A. Barakat, “Roland barthes semiotic study: understanding the meaning word of ’azab, a reinterpretation for modern society,” QiST: Journal of Quran and Tafseer Studies, vol. 2, no. 3, pp. 255–274, Jul. 2023, doi: 10.23917/qist.v2i3.1445.