“God or Idol?” Research exploration of AI idolization awareness in poster design

Main Article Content

Andreas James Darmawan
Sugiyanto Sugiyanto
Putri Karin Cinthya
Sitinjak Eunike Yolanda Zefanya

Abstract

The study aims to explore how poster design can be utilized as a medium for critical reflection on the relationship between humans and artificial intelligence (AI). Using the Research Through Design approach, the study developed and compared two poster concepts: a collaborative human–AI poster and a provocative AI-idolization poster. Began with poster creation, which conveys a message regarding the position of AI and humans. Poster with knowledge tree theme was chosen to represent harmony between organic and technological elements. This poster depicts humans and AI sitting side by side under a tree with circuit-shaped roots, symbolizing synergy and connectedness. However, despite its aesthetic and communicative value, this visual model has been widely used, resulting in a weak awareness effect; audiences are accustomed to similar metaphors. As an alternative, a second approach was taken, creating a quirky poster that combines a religious figure with robotic elements as an AI modern idol. This provocative visual creates shock awareness, forcing audiences to consider the position of AI, whether read as a colleague or excessively glorified. Using a qualitative approach with descriptive methods, results confirm that the AI ​​goddess poster is more effective in raising critical awareness than the tree poster. Through visual rhetoric and semiotic analysis, findings suggest that unconventional visual metaphors have greater potential to stimulate critical reflection regarding AI's position in contemporary society.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Article Details

Section
Articles

References

[1] Y. Li, “Impact of Artificial Intelligence on Creative Digital Content Production,” J. Digit. Art Eng. Multimed., vol. 6, no. 2, pp. 121–132, Dec. 2019, doi: 10.29056/jdaem.2019.12.05.

[2] P. G. Lange, M. Ito, D. Perkel, D. Mahendran, and B. Herr-Stephenson, “Creative production,” 2009, doi: 10.7551/mitpress/8402.003.0010.

[3] N. Anantrasirichai and D. Bull, “Artificial intelligence in the creative industries: a review,” Artif. Intell. Rev., vol. 55, no. 1, pp. 589–656, Jan. 2022, doi: 10.1007/s10462-021-10039-7.

[4] S. Singh and H. K. Thakur, “Survey of Various AI Chatbots Based on Technology Used,” 2020 8th Int. Conf. Reliab. Infocom Technol. Optim. (Trends Futur. Dir., pp. 1074–1079, 2020, doi: 10.1109/ICRITO48877.2020.9197943.

[5] S. Hemraj, “AI and the future of creative development: redefining digital media production,” AI Ethics, vol. 5, no. 5, pp. 5105–5119, Oct. 2025, doi: 10.1007/s43681-025-00765-x.

[6] J. Cui, “The Effect of Digital Technology Innovation and Knowledge Sharing on Firm Performance: The Mediating Role of Human-AI Collaboration and Moderating Effect of Human-AI Interaction.”

[7] A. J. Darmawan, I. M. G. Arimbawa, A. Heptariza, and H. Brayen, “Harnessing Ai Image Generator Prompt Engineering For Academic Excellence,” Proceeding Bali-Bhuwana Waskita Glob. Art Creat. Conf., vol. 4, pp. 192–202, Dec. 2024, doi: 10.31091/bbwp.v4i1.478.

[8] E. Bryndin, “Creative Communication Safe Ethical Artificial Intelligence in the Era of Technological Development,” Softw. Eng., vol. 8, no. 3, p. 13, 2020, doi: 10.11648/j.se.20200803.11.

[9] A. Nasser El Erafy, “Applications of Artificial Intelligence in the field of media,” Int. J. Artif. Intell. Emerg. Technol., vol. 6, no. 2, pp. 19–41, 2023, doi: 10.21608/ijaiet.2024.275179.1006.

[10] J. Haase and S. Pokutta, “Human–AI cocreativity: Exploring synergies across levels of creative collaboration,” in Generative Artificial Intelligence and Creativity, Elsevier, 2026, pp. 205–221, doi: 10.1016/B978-0-443-34073-4.00009-5 .

[11] P. Karimi, J. Rezwana, S. Siddiqui, M. Lou Maher, and N. Dehbozorgi, “Creative sketching partner: an analysis of human-AI co-creativity,” in Proceedings of the 25th international conference on intelligent user interfaces, 2020, pp. 221–230, doi: 10.1145/3377325.3377522 .

[12] W. Ge and G. Hou, “The effects of generative AI model type and visual stimuli type on design creativity,” Artif. Intell. Eng. Des. Anal. Manuf., vol. 39, p. e17, Jul. 2025, doi: 10.1017/S0890060425100061.

[13] L. Wen, W. Jingjing, W. Chen, and S. Luyu, “Research on the Visual Imagery of Posters Based on the Culture Code Theory of Design,” Front. Psychol., vol. 13, Jun. 2022, doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2022.861366.

[14] Y. Yang, “A Study of Creative Imagery in Public Service Posters Based on Design Cultural Codes Theory,” Adv. Humanit. Res., vol. 2, no. 1, pp. 47–55, Sep. 2023, doi: 10.54254/2753-7080/2/2023012.

[15] G. Amato et al., “AI in the media and creative industries,” arXiv Prepr. arXiv1905.04175, 2019.

[16] A. Shrivastava, A. Pandey, N. Singh, S. Srivastava, M. Srivastava, and A. Srivastava, “Artificial intelligence (AI): Evolution, methodologies, and applications,” Int. J. Res. Appl. Sci. Eng. Technol., vol. 12, no. 4, pp. 5501–5505, 2024, doi: 10.22214/ijraset.2024.61241.

[17] M. Yadav, M. Kumar, A. Sahoo, and M. S. H. Rathnasiri, “AI and the Evolution of Artistic Expression,” 2024, pp. 15–36, doi: 10.4018/979-8-3693-3916-9.ch002 .

[18] D. J. Gunkel, “Communication and artificial intelligence: Opportunities and challenges for the 21st century,” Commun. 1, vol. 1, no. 1, 2012.

[19] J. Zimmerman, E. Stolterman, and J. Forlizzi, “An analysis and critique of Research through Design,” in Proceedings of the 8th ACM Conference on Designing Interactive Systems, 2010, pp. 310–319, doi: 10.1145/1858171.1858228.

[20] M. Danesi, “Visual Rhetoric and Semiotic,” in Oxford Research Encyclopedia of Communication, Oxford University PressNew York, NY, 2017, doi: 10.1093/acrefore/9780190228613.013.43.

[21] B. Kinnear, A. Martini, L. Varpio, E. W. Driessen, and D. J. Schumacher, “How do validity experts conceptualise argumentation? It’s a rhetorical question,” Med. Educ., vol. 58, no. 8, pp. 989–997, Aug. 2024, doi: 10.1111/medu.15311.

[22] F. Vinchon et al., “Artificial Intelligence & Creativity: A Manifesto for Collaboration,” J. Creat. Behav., vol. 57, no. 4, pp. 472–484, Dec. 2023, doi: 10.1002/jocb.597.

[23] Z. Wu, D. Ji, K. Yu, X. Zeng, D. Wu, and M. Shidujaman, “AI Creativity and the Human-AI Co-creation Model,” 2021, pp. 171–190, doi: 10.1007/978-3-030-78462-1_13.

[24] G. Romeo and D. Conti, “Exploring automation bias in human–AI collaboration: a review and implications for explainable AI,” Ai Soc., vol. 41, no. 1, pp. 259–278, 2026, doi: 10.1007/s00146-025-02422-7 .

[25] J. McCormack, P. Hutchings, T. Gifford, M. Yee-King, M. T. Llano, and M. D’inverno, “Design Considerations for Real-Time Collaboration with Creative Artificial Intelligence,” Organised Sound, vol. 25, no. 1, pp. 41–52, Apr. 2020, doi: 10.1017/S1355771819000451.

[26] I. Ikram and B. Othman, “Human-AI collaboration: Enhancing creativity and productivity in the digital age,” Balt. J. Multidiscip. Res., vol. 2, no. 1, pp. 1–6, 2025.

[27] M. H. Jarrahi, “Artificial intelligence and the future of work: Human-AI symbiosis in organizational decision making,” Bus. Horiz., vol. 61, no. 4, pp. 577–586, 2018, doi: 10.1016/j.bushor.2018.03.007.

[28] A. J. Darmawan, S. Sugiyanto, P. K. Cinthya, and S. E. Y. Zefanya, “‘God Or Idol?’ research exploration of AI idolization awareness in poster design,” Dewa Ruci J. Pengkaj. dan Pencipta. Seni, vol. 21, no. 1, 2026.

[29] B. Mahmud, G. Hong, and B. Fong, “A Study of Human–AI Symbiosis for Creative Work: Recent Developments and Future Directions in Deep Learning,” ACM Trans. Multimed. Comput. Commun. Appl., vol. 20, no. 2, pp. 1–21, Feb. 2024, doi: 10.1145/3542698.

[30] R. H. Palmer, “Style in Lighting Design,” Educ. Theatr. J., vol. 19, no. 2, p. 142, May 1967, doi: 10.2307/3205138.

[31] İ. Yılmaz and G. Koç, “Analysis of Human Rights-Themed Posters Using a Semiotic Approach: A Review of the TRPOSTER Exhibition,” Online J. Art Des., vol. 14, no. 1, pp. 117–129, Jan. 2026, doi: 10.30935/ojad/2513080.

[32] R. Adiansyah, A. Sofia, M. Bensar, A. Adams, and M. A. Barakat, “Roland Barthes Semiotic Study: Understanding The Meaning Word Of ’Azab, A Reinterpretation For Modern Society,” QiST J. Quran Tafseer Stud., vol. 2, no. 3, pp. 255–274, Jul. 2023, doi: 10.23917/qist.v2i3.1445.