Sapta Cipta Rasa Tunggal Offering Dance at the 51st Dies Natalis of ISI Surakarta

Main Article Content

Suharji suharji
Soemaryatmi Soemaryatmi
Darmasti Darmasti
Efrida Efrida
Sumargono Sumargono
Sri Ningsih Sukirman

Abstract

This research is a case study of the performance of the offering dance at the ISI Surakarta 51st Dies Natalis Ceremony (held on July 15th, 2015) by seven dancers. The seven dancers previously acted as leaders of the Senate procession, after the members of the senate sat in their seats, they danced to express the character of Bima so that it could be said that the dance was part of the ceremonial event. The sesaji dance is an expression of Bima's character, which in Javanese collective knowledge is a complex system of symbols. This phenomenon is approached through the constructivism paradigm, especially from the point of view of interpretivism where the methodological mission is to elaborate a reflective events. The research question posed is what constitutes a gift or alms in the Sapta Cipta Rasa Tunggal – title of that dance — as offering dance considering that offerings lexico-etymologically means giving alms or charity. Triangulative data as objects of observation are videos of dance performances via the YouTube platform, interviews with source persons, and library data. The conclusions drawn are: 1) this sesaji dance is a form of mnemonic (kinetic mnemonic) in the form of motion as a tool for reflective memory; 2) offering dance and imitation of the imaginary character in the kind of the Bima containing doxa – knowledge that does not need to be verified – that the ethical attitudes that humans should have are teteg, tatag, teguh, tanggon, and tanggap.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Article Details

Section
Articles

References

Bourdieu, P. 2013. Outline of a Theory of Practice. Transl. Richard Nice. Cambridge: Cambridge Unversity Press.

Brookes, I. et.al. eds. 2004. Chambers Concise Dictionary. Edinburgh: Chambers Harrap Publishers Ltd.

Denzin, N.K. and Lincoln, Y.S. eds. 2005. The Sage Handbook of Qualitative Research Third Edition. London & New Delhi: Sage Publications.

Kamus Besar Bahasa Indonesia (KBBI) Edisi tiga, 2001. Jakarta : Balai Pustaka.

Mangunsong, H.R.B and Handayaningrum, W. 2022. The creative process of the Potehi puppet craftsman in Gudo Jombang. Dewa Ruci: Jurnal Pengkajian dan Penciptaan Seni Vol. 17 (1) pp. 1-11.

Mendel, M. and Klonkowska, A.M. 2022. Towards A Ritualized Public Space Above Divisions: Creative (Re) Construction Of Children’s Rites Of Passage. Creativity studies Vol. 15 (2) pp. 316-331.

Runco, M.A. and Jaeger, G.J. 2012. The Standard Definition of Creativity. Creativity Research Journal: 24(1), pp. 92-96.

Siswaharsaya. 1883. Bimapaksa. Yogyakarta: Paguyuban Mahadewa-Sumadijaya.

Solberg, I. 2016. Land Art In Preschools An Art Practice. International Journal of Education and the Arts, pp. 1-23.

Sriyadi and Pramutomo. 2021. Presentation Style of Bedhaya Bedhah Madiun Dance in Pura Mangkunegaran. Dewa Ruci: Jurnal Pengkajian dan Penciptaan Seni Vol. 16 (1) pp. 22-36.

Thomson, P. and Jaque, S.V. 2017. Creativity and Performing Artist. Behind the Mask. London: Academic Press for Elsevier.

Wagemans, J. 2015. Vision, High-Level Theory of. International Encyclopedia Of The Social & Behavioral Sciences Second Edition Vol. 25. Wright, J.D. ed. Amsterdam: Elsevier.

Web-Site

https://kbbi.web.id/cipta, 22 Nopember 2022