Aesthetics exploration of chiaroscuro light: capturing the visual atmosphere of traditional markets in Jakarta
Main Article Content
Abstract
Downloads
Article Details
Copyright
Authors who publish with Gelar: Jurnal Seni Budaya agrees to the following terms:
- Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY-SA 4.0) that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgment of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgment of its initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work.
References
H. Yaacob, M. H. H. Azahari, and A. I. Ismail, “Social Commentary on Photographic Images,” Procedia - Soc. Behav. Sci., vol. 91, pp. 185–191, Oct. 2013, doi: 10.1016/j.sbspro.2013.08.416.
J. Cinnamon and A. Gaffney, “Do-It-Yourself Street Views and the Urban Imaginary of Google Street View,” J. Urban Technol., vol. 29, no. 3, pp. 95–116, Jul. 2022, doi: 10.1080/10630732.2021.1910467.
J. Cinnamon and L. Jahiu, “Panoramic Street-Level Imagery in Data-Driven Urban Research: A Comprehensive Global Review of Applications, Techniques, and Practical Considerations,” ISPRS Int. J. Geo-Information, vol. 10, no. 7, p. 471, Jul. 2021, doi: 10.3390/ijgi10070471.
F. Biljecki, T. Zhao, X. Liang, and Y. Hou, “Sensitivity of measuring the urban form and greenery using street-level imagery: A comparative study of approaches and visual perspectives,” Int. J. Appl. Earth Obs. Geoinf., vol. 122, p. 103385, Aug. 2023, doi: 10.1016/j.jag.2023.103385.
J. Dibazar, P., & Naeff, Visualizing the Street: New Practices of Documenting, Navigating and Imagining the City. Amsterdam University Press, 2018. doi: 10.2307/j.ctv9hvqjh
J. Scanlan, “Raymond Moore’s uncertain places,” photographies, vol. 15, no. 2, pp. 225–239, May 2022, doi: 10.1080/17540763.2022.2060288.
E. Lamberg, “Professionalism, privilege and publicity: representations of development cooperation in amateur photography and Finnish newspapers, 1968–1972,” Vis. Stud., pp. 1–18, Feb. 2023, doi: 10.1080/1472586X.2023.2168212.
J. Vuorinen, “More-than photography and sculpture: a diffractive reading,” photographies, vol. 15, no. 3, pp. 405–423, Sep. 2022, doi: 10.1080/17540763.2022.2108885.
P. A. Vinosha et al., “Impact of dysprosium doped (Dy) zinc ferrite (ZnFe2o4) nanocrystals in photo- fenton exclusion of recalcitrant organic pollutant,” Environ. Res., vol. 203, p. 111913, Jan. 2022, doi: 10.1016/j.envres.2021.111913.
T. Bruś, “Commitment to Face,” in Face Forms in Life-Writing of the Interwar Years, Cham: Springer Nature Switzerland, 2023, pp. 1–24. doi: 10.1007/978-3-031-36899-8_1
D. G. Puspitasari, S. Sabana, H. A. Ahmad, and H. Wijaya, “Chiaroscuro in Visual Narrative of Sang Pencerah Film by Hanung Bramantyo,” Adv. Sci. Lett., vol. 23, no. 1, pp. 414–416, Jan. 2017, doi: 10.1166/asl.2017.7202.
S. Goldsmith, “Almost Gone: Rembrandt and the Ends of Materialism,” New Lit. Hist., vol. 45, no. 3, pp. 411–443, 2014, doi: 10.1353/nlh.2014.0029.
G. L. Scheper, “The Reformist Vision of Frederick Law Olmsted and the Poetics of Park Design,” New Engl. Q., vol. 62, no. 3, pp. 369–402, Sep. 1989, doi: 10.2307/365780.
J. Corvalán, “Rhythmic Alternation: Metaphors of Light, Dark and Shadow,” Archit. Des., vol. 93, no. 4, pp. 78–85, Jul. 2023, doi: 10.1002/ad.2957.
M. Freeman, The complete guide to black & white digital photography. Sterling Publishing Company, Inc., 2010.
C. Fulton, “Urban Exploration: Traces of the Secretly Documented, Decayed, and Disused,” Libr. Trends, vol. 69, no. 3, pp. 556–572, 2021, doi: 10.1353/lib.2021.0003.
M. R. Ilhami, E. W. Abbas, M. Mutiani, J. Jumriani, and R. Rusmaniah, “The Social Values of the Banjar People in Traditional Markets,” Innov. Soc. Stud. J., vol. 4, no. 1, pp. 71–83, Sep. 2022, doi: 10.20527/iis.v4i1.6194.
P. A. Rauschnabel, B. J. Babin, M. C. tom Dieck, N. Krey, and T. Jung, “What is augmented reality marketing? Its definition, complexity, and future,” J. Bus. Res., vol. 142, pp. 1140–1150, Mar. 2022, doi: 10.1016/j.jbusres.2021.12.084.
D. Bell, “The Primacy of Practice: Establishing the Terms of Reference of Creative Arts and Media Research,” in Screen Production Research, Cham: Springer International Publishing, 2018, pp. 47–66. doi: 10.1007/978-3-319-62837-0_4
G. Sullivan, “Research Acts in Art Practice,” Stud. Art Educ., vol. 48, no. 1, pp. 19–35, Oct. 2006, doi: 10.1080/00393541.2006.11650497.
D. Prosser, J., & Schwartz, “Photographs within the Sociological Research Process: Jon Prosser and Dona Schwartz,” in Image-based Research, Routledge, 2005, pp. 119–134. doi: 10.4324/9780203980330-15
S. Schembri and M. V. Boyle, “Visual ethnography: Achieving rigorous and authentic interpretations,” J. Bus. Res., vol. 66, no. 9, pp. 1251–1254, Sep. 2013, doi: 10.1016/j.jbusres.2012.02.021.
S. S. Andrews, “Electromagnetic Waves,” in Light and Waves, Cham: Springer International Publishing, 2023, pp. 273–305. doi: 10.1007/978-3-031-24097-3_11
R. Barthes, “The photographic message,” in Theorizing communication: readings across traditions, 2000, pp. 191–199.