Exploring the interplay of psychoacoustic parameters and microphone selection in soundscape recording: a comprehensive review and practical guide

Article Sidebar

PDF
Published: Jun 1, 2024
DOI: https://doi.org/10.33153/glr.v22i1.5833
Keywords:
Soundscape, Recording, Psychoacoustic, Parameter, Microphone

Main Article Content

Royys Bagja Rizky Satya
Universitas Pendidikan Indonesia, Bandung, Jawa Barat
https://orcid.org/0009-0006-0492-3015
Yudi Sukmayadi
Universitas Pendidikan Indonesia, Bandung, Jawa Barat
https://orcid.org/0000-0001-6637-3297
Tati Narawati
Universitas Pendidikan Indonesia, Bandung, Jawa Barat
https://orcid.org/0000-0002-2746-7327

Abstract

This research explores the intricate relationship between psychoacoustic parameters and microphone selection for soundscape recording, drawing inspiration from foundational concepts introduced by Schafer and Cage. Motivated by the need to comprehend the influence of psychoacoustic dimensions—specifically frequency, sound intensity, and time—on the choice of microphones for capturing auditory environments, the study adopts Liu and Kang's systematic literature review method. This approach entails a comprehensive analysis of diverse sources to identify knowledge gaps and establish a robust theoretical foundation. The primary aim is to offer practical guidance to professionals and researchers in the field of soundscape recording. Findings underscore the efficacy of a cardioid condenser stereo microphone that aligns with the analyzed psychoacoustic parameters. This study not only contributes to advancing practices in soundscape recording but also deepens our understanding of the intricate dynamics between soundscape, psychoacoustics, and sound recording devices. By recognizing the significance of Liu and Kang's methodology, the research serves as a foundation for future experimental designs and field testing. Acknowledging Liu and Kang's contributions, the study highlights the pivotal role of their systematic literature review method in shaping the research landscape, underscoring the importance of methodological rigor in advancing our understanding of complex auditory phenomena. This research provides a comprehensive overview of the nuanced relationship between psychoacoustic parameters and microphone selection for soundscape recording, contributing to the broader discourse in the field of auditory research. The implications of this research extend to the field of sound environment recording and psychoacoustics, providing a deeper understanding, improving recording quality, developing practical guidelines, encouraging recording technology innovation, and contributing to the field of psychoacoustics.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Article Details

Issue
Vol. 22 No. 1 (2024)
Section
Articles
Creative Commons License

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.

Copyright

Authors who publish with Gelar: Jurnal Seni Budaya agrees to the following terms:

  1. Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY-SA 4.0) that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgment of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal. 
  2. Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgment of its initial publication in this journal.
  3. Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work.

References

R. Sugiarto and N. G. Wijaya, “elaah Pengukuran Soundscape Sebagai Kritik Terhadap Elemen Arsitektural Di Taman Film Bandung Sebagai Usaha Peningkatan Kualitas Ruang Kota,” J. Arsit. ARCADE, vol. 3, no. 3, p. 258, Dec. 2019, doi: 10.31848/arcade.v3i3.210.

S. Nakagawa, Musik dan Kosmos Sebuah Pengantar Etnomusikologi. Jakarta: Yayasan Obor Indonesia, 2000.

R. M. Schafer, “I’ve never seen a sound,” Sound in Contemporary Canadian Art/Le son dans l’art contemporain canadien. pp. 66–71, 2003.

S. Hardjana, Estetika musik: Sebuah pengantar. Yogyakarta: Art Music Today, 2018.

R. M. Schafer, Our sonic environment and the soundscape: The tuning of the world. Destiny Books, 1994.

B. Bartlett and J. Bartlett, Practical Recording Techniques. 7th edition. | New York, NY : Routledge, 2016.: Routledge, 2016. doi: 10.4324/9781315696331

J. Liu, J. Kang, H. Behm, and T. Luo, “Effects of landscape on soundscape perception: Soundwalks in city parks,” Landsc. Urban Plan., vol. 123, pp. 30–40, Mar. 2014, doi: 10.1016/j.landurbplan.2013.12.003.

J. Hong, J. He, B. Lam, R. Gupta, and W.-S. Gan, “Spatial Audio for Soundscape Design: Recording and Reproduction,” Appl. Sci., vol. 7, no. 6, p. 627, Jun. 2017, doi: 10.3390/app7060627.

A. Mitchell et al., “The Soundscape Indices (SSID) Protocol: A Method for Urban Soundscape Surveys—Questionnaires with Acoustical and Contextual Information,” Appl. Sci., vol. 10, no. 7, p. 2397, Apr. 2020, doi: 10.3390/app10072397.

J. Liu and J. Kang, “Soundscape design in city parks: Exploring the relationships between soundscape composition parameters and physical and psychoacoustic parameters,” J. Environ. Eng. Landsc. Manag., vol. 23, no. 2, pp. 102–112, Jun. 2015, doi: 10.3846/16486897.2014.998676.

M. B. Harari, H. R. Parola, C. J. Hartwell, and A. Riegelman, “Literature searches in systematic reviews and meta-analyses: A review, evaluation, and recommendations,” J. Vocat. Behav., vol. 118, p. 103377, Apr. 2020, doi: 10.1016/j.jvb.2020.103377.

H. Snyder, “Literature review as a research methodology: An overview and guidelines,” J. Bus. Res., vol. 104, pp. 333–339, Nov. 2019, doi: 10.1016/j.jbusres.2019.07.039.

D. Papaioannou, A. Sutton, and A. Booth, “Systematic approaches to a successful literature review,” Systematic approaches to a successful literature review. Sage Publications Ltd, pp. 1–336, 2016.

F. Aletta and J. Kang, “Soundscape approach integrating noise mapping techniques: a case study in Brighton, UK,” Noise Mapp., vol. 2, no. 1, Jan. 2015, doi: 10.1515/noise-2015-0001.

F. Aletta and J. Kang, “Towards an Urban Vibrancy Model: A Soundscape Approach,” Int. J. Environ. Res. Public Health, vol. 15, no. 8, p. 1712, Aug. 2018, doi: 10.3390/ijerph15081712.

B. Truax, “From soundscape documentation to soundscape composition,” in Acoustics 2012, 2012.

I. Fesenko and J.-C. García-Rosell, “An acoustic perspective on nature-based tourism experience – The soundscape of dog sledding, Lapland,” Matkailututkimus, vol. 15, no. 1, pp. 88–92, Aug. 2019, doi: 10.33351/mt.84315.

J. Meyer, Acoustics and the performance of music: Manual for acousticians, audio engineers, musicians, architects and musical instrument makers. Springer Science & Business Media, 2009.

P. Cui, T. Li, Z. Xia, and C. Dai, “Research on the Effects of Soundscapes on Human Psychological Health in an Old Community of a Cold Region,” Int. J. Environ. Res. Public Health, vol. 19, no. 12, p. 7212, Jun. 2022, doi: 10.3390/ijerph19127212.

G. Ballou, Handbook for Sound Engineers. Routledge, 2013. doi: 10.4324/9780080927619

G. Brambilla and F. Pedrielli, “Smartphone-Based Participatory Soundscape Mapping for a More Sustainable Acoustic Environment,” Sustainability, vol. 12, no. 19, p. 7899, Sep. 2020, doi: 10.3390/su12197899.

A. N. Radford, E. Kerridge, and S. D. Simpson, “Acoustic communication in a noisy world: can fish compete with anthropogenic noise?,” Behav. Ecol., vol. 25, no. 5, pp. 1022–1030, Sep. 2014, doi: 10.1093/beheco/aru029.

P. Yelmi, “Protecting contemporary cultural soundscapes as intangible cultural heritage: sounds of Istanbul,” Int. J. Herit. Stud., vol. 22, no. 4, pp. 302–311, Apr. 2016, doi: 10.1080/13527258.2016.1138237.

H. Weekhout, Music production : learn how to record, mix, and master music. Third edition. | New York, NY : Routledge, 2019.: Routledge, 2019. doi: 10.4324/9780429459504

K. Hermes, Performing Electronic Music Live. London: Focal Press, 2021. doi: 10.4324/9780367340759

A. Pras, C. Cance, and C. Guastavino, “Record Producers’ Best Practices For Artistic Direction—From Light Coaching To Deeper Collaboration With Musicians,” J. New Music Res., vol. 42, no. 4, pp. 381–395, Dec. 2013, doi: 10.1080/09298215.2013.848903.

B. Owsinski, The recording engineer’s handbook. Hal Leonard Corporation, 2005.

H. I. Midyanti and Y. Sukmayadi, “The intersection of local wisdom and digital innovation in performing arts,” Interlude Indones. J. Music Res. Dev. Technol., vol. 1, no. 1, pp. 43–60, 2021.

K. Andjani, Apa itu musik?: kajian tentang sunyi dan bunyi berdasarkan 4’33" karya John C age. Yogyakarta: Marjin Kiri, 2014.

B. C. Pijanowski et al., “Soundscape Ecology: The Science of Sound in the Landscape,” Bioscience, vol. 61, no. 3, pp. 203–216, Mar. 2011, doi: 10.1525/bio.2011.61.3.6.

C. C. and D. Warner, Audio culture : readings in modern music. Bloomsbury Publishing Inc, 2017.