Langke Bulawa Statue in the perspective of review Bada valley site culture
Article Sidebar
Main Article Content
Abstract
This article proposes a model of interpretation of the Langke Bulawa statue based on a theoretical approach based on the cultural sociology theory of naturalism from the perspective of the place and location where the statue is located, namely in the Bada Valley. Cultural sociology can fill the cultural gap in the sociology of art and can provide a method for identifying the linguistic context that surrounds social institutions. The aim is to discuss classical readings of the object by constructing alternatives that do not attempt to decipher symbolic content or show naturalistic representations in the form of sculptural objects. Instead, in Langke Bulawa Statue, the author proposes a theoretical approach that goes beyond the descriptive approach that ultimately provides only a vague interpretation of the Langke Bulawa statue as stelae by considering the statue as an artistic expression of a people with aesthetic norms, conditioned by traditions, resulting in a kind of object form that must try to be found based on the representation of cultural views in Bada Valley, where the physical boundaries between humans and non-humans disappear, to show figures that have the same essence, but merge in one object form, namely the Langke Bulawa statue as a representation of a figure with the only female form where the implications of a sociocultural perspective in this study will contribute to interpreting the Langke Bulawa statue as a potential contribution of cultural sociology research related to megalithic relics in Central Sulawesi Province.
Downloads
Article Details
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
Copyright
Authors who publish with Gelar: Jurnal Seni Budaya agrees to the following terms:
- Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY-SA 4.0) that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgment of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgment of its initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work.
References
R. Chahyadi, “Menjejakkan Kaki di Lore Lindu, Situs Megalitikum Tertua Baca artikel detikTravel, ‘Menjejakkan Kaki di Lore Lindu, Situs Megalitikum Tertua,’” travel.detik.com, Aug-2019. .
P. D. Syahjada, “Langkah awal menjadikan Kawasan Megalitik Lore Lindu sebagai Warisan Dunia’’,” tutura.id, 2023. .
C. Paino, “Lembah Bada, Situs Megalitik Tertua Indonesia yang Diusulkan Jadi Warisan Dunia,” https://www.mongabay.co.id, Jul-2019. .
J. AB, “Sepenggal Kisah Negeri Seribu Megalit,” media.alkhairaat.id, Jul-2023. .
Tapak Waktu Megasitus Lore. BPCB Gorontalo, 2022.
Q. T. Yago, “Quimeras, ontologías y perspectivismo para una revisión de la cultura arqueológica chamánica de San Agustín (Colombia),” Boletín Antropol., vol. 33, no. 55, pp. 297–322, Aug. 2017, doi: 10.17533/udea.boan.v33n55a14.
C. Fox, “Down with this sort of thing: why no public statue should stand forever,” Crit. Rev. Int. Soc. Polit. Philos., vol. 0, no. 0, pp. 1–22, 2023, doi: 10.1080/13698230.2023.2218733.
T. Steimer-Herbet, Indonesian Megaliths: A Forgotten Cultural Heritage. 2018. doi: 10.2307/jj.15136043
M. N. Vahia and S. M. Menon, “Possible Influences of India on Southeast Asian Astronomy: A Brief Review of the Archaeoastronomical Record,” in Exploring the History of Southeast Asian Astronomy: A Review of Current Projects and Future Prospects and Possibilities, W. Orchiston and M. N. Vahia, Eds. Cham: Springer International Publishing, 2021, pp. 601–634. doi: 10.1007/978-3-030-62777-5_21
R. Jemali, “Batuan Megalitik di Lembah Bada Punya Misteri Kejayaan Masa Lalu Dibalut Kisah Kutukan Paling Sadis,” Sep-2023. .
M. Tahnun, R. Efendi, and A. Abdullah, “Pemodelan Benda-Benda Megalit Bawah Permukaan Menggunakan Data Geomagnet di Taman Wisata Palindo Kecamatan Lore Barat Kabupaten Poso,” Gravitasi, vol. 17, no. 1, pp. 50–56, Aug. 2018, doi: 10.22487/gravitasi.v17i1.10672.
W. Kaudern, Ethnographical Studies in Celebes. Results of the Author’s Expedition to Celebes 1917-20. IV Games and Dances in Celebes., 4th ed., vol. 5–6. Sweden: Elanders Boktryckeri Aktiebolag, 1929.
W. Kaudern, “Temuan Megalitik di Sulawesi Tengah oleh Dr. Walter Kaudern: (Jilid Lima: Kajian Etnografi di Sulawesi: Hasil Ekspedisi Penulis ke Sulawesi 1917–1920),” L O B O Ann. Sulawesi Res., vol. 6, no. 1, pp. 1–96, 2022.
T. R. Matana, “Patung Palindo Ikon Wisata Kabupaten Poso,” Ekomen, vol. 15, no. 1, pp. 10–17, 2015.
N. P. Artanti, “Merenda Sejarah di Lembah Bada,” djkn.kemenkeu.go.id, Nov-2023. .
C. M. Todongi, “Tabir Misteri Patung Purba Di Tiga Lembah Sulawesi Tengah,” nuansapos.com, 2021.
C. P. Lipo, T. L. Hunt, and S. R. Haoa, “The ‘walking’ megalithic statues (moai) of Easter Island,” J. Archaeol. Sci., vol. 40, no. 6, pp. 2859–2866, Jun. 2013, doi: 10.1016/j.jas.2012.09.029.
R. N. Tambalo, “Kajian Rupa Arca Megalitik Lembah Bada,” Skripsi, Institut Seni Indonesia Yogyakarta, Yogyakarta, 2018. doi: 10.24821/invensi.v3i1.2102
V. Rull, “Contributions of paleoecology to Easter Island’s prehistory: A thorough review,” Quat. Sci. Rev., vol. 252, p. 106751, Jan. 2021, doi: 10.1016/j.quascirev.2020.106751.
I. W. i Marzuki, “Konflik dan Penyelesaian Dalam Penelitian Arkeologi Di Wilayah Kerja Balai Arkeologi Manado,” vol. 33 N, no. 2, pp. 123–134, Jan. 2024. doi: 10.24832/amt.v33i2.220
A. Dipo Ramelan, “Tinggalan Megalitik Lore Lindu Dan Rampi (Perbedaan Bentuk Temuan Arca Megalitik Pada Lembah Bada, Behoa, Napu Dan Rampi),” Skripsi, Universitas Hasanuddin, Makassar, 2021.
D. Yani Yuniawati, Laporan Penelitian Di Situs Megalitik Lembah Besoa, Kecamatan Lore Utara, Kabupaten Poso, Provinsi Sulawesi Tengah, vol. 50. Jakarta: Berita Penelitian Arkeologi, 2000.
M. Hasan, To-Lindu Masyarakat Adat Penghuni Taman Nasional Lore Lindu. Yogyakarta: Deepublish, 2023.
A. Misno and S. Mohamad Sharif, Menggenggam Nusantara Raya. Gramedia: Gramedia Pustaka Utama, 2020.
E. A. Hodson, “Prisms of the abstract: Material relations in Icelandic art,” J. Mater. Cult., vol. 22, no. 1, pp. 72–92, 2017, doi: 10.1177/1359183516679185.
L. Yondri, “Rethinking About Megalithic Term In Indonesian Culture,” in Proceedings of the Third International Seminar on Recent Language, Literature, and Local Culture Studies, BASA, 20-21 September 2019, 2020, pp. 1–7, doi: 10.4108/eai.20-9-2019.2296643.
O. Lizardo et al., “What Are Dual Process Models? Implications for Cultural Analysis in Sociology,” Sociol. Theory, vol. 34, no. 4, pp. 287–310, Dec. 2016, doi: 10.1177/0735275116675900.
U. H. Graneheim, B.-M. Lindgren, and B. Lundman, “Methodological challenges in qualitative content analysis: A discussion paper,” Nurse Educ. Today, vol. 56, pp. 29–34, Sep. 2017, doi: 10.1016/j.nedt.2017.06.002.
J. Tanner, “Narrative, Naturalism and The Body In Classical Greek And Early Imperial Chinese Art,” in Comparativism in Art History, 1st ed., London: Routledge, 2017, pp. 1–17. doi: 10.4324/9781315095530-12
W. Griswold, G. Mangione, and T. E. McDonnell, “Objects, Words, and Bodies in Space: Bringing Materiality into Cultural Analysis,” Qual. Sociol., vol. 36, no. 4, pp. 343–364, Dec. 2013, doi: 10.1007/s11133-013-9264-6.
H. Roose, W. Roose, and S. Daenekindt, “Trends in Contemporary Art Discourse: Using Topic Models to Analyze 25 years of Professional Art Criticism,” Cult. Sociol., vol. 12, no. 3, pp. 303–324, Sep. 2018, doi: 10.1177/1749975518764861.
T. Steimer-Herbet and Besse, “Indonesian Megaliths as the Result of the Interaction between Indigenous Peoples and Hindu-Buddhist Kingdoms,” in Proceedings the International Symposium on Austronesian Diaspora, 2016, pp. 301–318, doi: https://archive-ouverte.unige.ch/unige:92335.
T. A. Pohe, “Mengungkap Misteri dan Keindahan Situs Megalitik Lembah Bada,” .jurnalflores.co.id, 2023. .
S. H. Yudhanto, F. Risdianto, and A. T. Artanto, “Cultural and Communication Approaches in the Design of Visual Communication Design Works,” J. Linguist. Cult. Commun., vol. 1, no. 1, pp. 79–90, Jun. 2023, doi: 10.61320/jolcc.v1i1.79-90.
V. A. Anggraeni, “Inilah Situs Megalitik Tertua Indonesia yang Diusulkan Menjadi Warisan Dunia,” goodnewsfromindonesia.id, Jul-2019. .
Besse, “Around the Petit-Chasseur Site in Sion (Valais, Switzerland) and New Approaches to the Bell Beaker Culture :,” in Proceedings of the International Conference Sion, Switzerland, 2011, pp. 113–130.
H. Pertiwi, K. Swastika, S. Sumarjono, M. Na’im, and A. R. Pratama, “Megalithic Culture at the Suco Lor site Bondowoso,” in 3rd International Conference on Environmental Geography and Geography Education, 2021, vol. 747, pp. 1–11, doi: 10.1088/1755-1315/747/1/012069.
J. Robb, “Prehistoric Art in Europe: A Deep-Time Social History,” Am. Antiq., vol. 80, no. 4, pp. 635–654, 2015, doi: 10.7183/0002-7316.80.4.635.
M. Wunderlich, Megalithic Monuments and Social Structures. Comparative Studies on Recent and Funnel Beaker societies, vol. 5. Sidestone Press, 2019. doi: 10.59641/f8134ir
B. Prasetyo, Megalitik, Fenomena yang Berkembang di Indonesia, 1st ed. Yogyakarta: Galangpress, 2015.
A. L. Nesterkina, Portnova, A. A. Fedorova, and L. Yondri, “The Megalithic Tradition of East and Southeast Asia,” Archaeol. Ethnol. Anthropol. Eurasia, vol. 50, no. 3, pp. 39–49, 2022, doi: 10.17746/1563-0110.2022.50.3.039-048.