Exploring self expression and femininity in food photography: the artworks of the women photographer community "Kompakers Jogja"

Authors

  • Arif Ardy Wibowo Department of Communication Science, Universitas Gadjah Mada, Yogyakarta
  • Ana Nadhya Abrar Communication Department, Universitas Gadjah Mada
  • Ardian Indro Yuwono Communication Department, Universitas Gadjah Mada

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.33153/glr.v22i2.6025

Keywords:

Community, Femininity, Food photography, Photo-elicitation, Photovoice

Abstract

This study aims to analyze of the expressions of femininity in food photography as carried out by Kompakers Jogja. Photography has historically been established inside male-dominated domains. Unlike the historical context where photography has consistently been associated with male-dominated, Kompakers Jogja presents a contrasting perspective that questions the established norms of male dominance. This research explore the diverse viewpoints of ten individuals using a combination of photovoice and photo-elicitation. Through the application of qualitative content analysis within the thematic framework of femininity in photography, categorized as Theatricality, Tactility, Softness, and Hybridity. The analysis reveals that community members infuse distinct feminine sensibilities in their photography, as corroborated through visual scrutiny and validated during photo-elicitation. Prevalent among these manifestations are theatricality and hybridity, exemplified by strategic prop placement and digital enhancements aimed at augmenting the aesthetic allure of the captured images. In addition, tactility becomes important, especially when carefully choosing angles to elicit gustatory wants. Although the works of the members exhibit some softness, they serve more as supporting element. In summary, the Kompakers Jogja depict motifs that subtly and intricately symbolize femininity in their photography. This research shows the distinct characteristics linked to the facets of femininity as expressions of women's self-identity.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

[1] R. Barthes, “Toward a Psychosociology of Contemporary Food Consumption,” in Food and Culture, 3rd ed., C. Counihan and P. Van Esterik, Eds., New York - London: Routledge, 2013, pp. 23–30.

[2] T. Andersen, D. V. Byrne, and Q. J. Wang, “How Digital Food Affects Our Analog Lives: The Impact of Food Photography on Healthy Eating Behavior,” Front. Psychol., vol. 12, no. April, 2021, doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2021.634261.

[3] E. Neely, M. Walton, and C. Stephens, “Young people’s food practices and social relationships. A thematic synthesis,” Appetite, vol. 82, pp. 50–60, 2014, doi: 10.1016/j.appet.2014.07.005.

[4] N. Hudgins, The Gender of Photography : How Masculine and Feminine Values Shaped the History of Nineteenth-Century Photography, 1st ed. New York: Routledge, 2020.

[5] E. M. Aparicio et al., “Experiences of the COVID-19 pandemic among young parents with foster care backgrounds: A participatory action PhotoVoice study,” Child. Youth Serv. Rev., vol. 148, no. November 2021, p. 106872, 2023, doi: 10.1016/j.childyouth.2023.106872.

[6] L. T. Roberts, C. H. Stein, and C. J. Tompsett, “Youth views of community needs: A photovoice collaboration,” Child. Youth Serv. Rev., vol. 139, no. December 2021, p. 106563, 2022, doi: 10.1016/j.childyouth.2022.106563.

[7] A. C. Y. Bray, C. H. R. Orchiston, and S. R. Shrestha, “Using photovoice for disaster and hazard preparedness: A methodological review,” Int. J. Disaster Risk Reduct., vol. 93, no. May, p. 103742, 2023, doi: 10.1016/j.ijdrr.2023.103742.

[8] T. Winter and E. A. Adu-Ampong, “Residents with camera: Exploring tourism impacts through participant-generated images,” Ann. Tour. Res., vol. 87, p. 103112, 2021, doi: 10.1016/j.annals.2020.103112.

[9] J. Binch, C. Backman, E. Dej, L. Leonard, and J. C. Phillips, “Photo elicitation to explore health and social exclusion with rooming house residents in Ottawa, Canada,” Heal. Place, vol. 77, no. November 2021, p. 102866, 2022, doi: 10.1016/j.healthplace.2022.102866.

[10] J. A. Nettleton, A. E. Burton, and R. C. Povey, “‘No-one realises what we go through as Type 1s’: A qualitative photo-elicitation study on coping with diabetes,” Diabetes Res. Clin. Pract., vol. 187, no. March, p. 109876, 2022, doi: 10.1016/j.diabres.2022.109876.

[11] S. J. Rivard et al., “It’s not fine: A photo-elicitation study of rectal cancer survivors’ emotions and coping strategies,” Surg. (United States), vol. 171, no. 6, pp. 1480–1485, 2022, doi: 10.1016/j.surg.2021.10.067.

[12] S. Holmes, “‘It’s always that idea that everyone’s trying to look like something’: Revisioning sociocultural factors in eating disorders through Photovoice,” Womens. Stud. Int. Forum, vol. 99, no. May, 2023, doi: 10.1016/j.wsif.2023.102753.

[13] R. C. Y. Chang, “Developing a taxonomy of motivations for foodstagramming through photo elicitation,” Int. J. Hosp. Manag., vol. 107, no. October, 2022, doi: 10.1016/j.ijhm.2022.103347.

[14] S. Mills, M. White, W. Wrieden, H. Brown, M. Stead, and J. Adams, “Home food preparation practices, experiences and perceptions: A qualitative interview study with photo-elicitation,” PLoS One, vol. 12, no. 8, pp. 1–18, 2017, doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0182842.

[15] E. M. Green, C. Spivak, and J. S. Dollahite, “Early adolescent food routines: A photo-elicitation study,” Appetite, vol. 158, no. June 2020, p. 105012, 2021, doi: 10.1016/j.appet.2020.105012.

[16] K. Uhlmann, H. Ross, L. Buckley, and B. B. Lin, “Food in my life: How Australian adolescents perceive and experience their foodscape,” Appetite, vol. 190, no. April, p. 107034, 2023, doi: 10.1016/j.appet.2023.107034.

[17] E. Malova et al., “Food, Our Common Ground: A Photovoice Study,” Front. Commun., vol. 6, no. March, pp. 1–8, 2021, doi: 10.3389/fcomm.2021.549105.

[18] J. MacIsaac, “Picturing femininities and masculinities: Using visual methods to explore gender relations,” Methods Psychol., vol. 5, no. November 2020, pp. 1–9, 2021, doi: 10.1016/j.metip.2021.100079.

[19] L. Cordisco Tsai, “Photovoice as a psychosocial intervention for survivors of human trafficking and gender-based violence,” J. Hum. Behav. Soc. Environ., vol. 33, no. 7, pp. 991–1005, 2023, doi: 10.1080/10911359.2022.2123424.

[20] C. Modugno and T. Krijnen, “‘Difference is the one thing that we have in common’. A photovoice exploration of fans articulating fair representation in Netflix’s ‘Sense8,’” Tripodos, no. 20, pp. 37–56, 2021, doi: 10.51698/TRIPODOS.2021.50P37-56.

[21] S. K. McKenzie, M. T. Kelly, E. Cooney, and J. L. Oliffe, “Men’s accounts of anxiety: A photovoice study,” SSM - Qual. Res. Heal., vol. 4, no. October, p. 100356, 2023, doi: 10.1016/j.ssmqr.2023.100356.

[22] S. Dhari, J. L. Oliffe, T. Goodyear, O. Ferlatte, C. McAuliffe, and E. Jenkins, “Anchoring to life: A photovoice study of resiliencies among sexual and gender minority women post-suicide attempt,” SSM - Qual. Res. Heal., vol. 3, no. January, p. 100219, 2023, doi: 10.1016/j.ssmqr.2023.100219.

[23] I. García, M. Albelson, N. Puczkowskyj, S. Maheruma Khan, and K. Fagundo-Ojeda, “Harassment of low-income women on transit: A photovoice project in Oregon and Utah,” Transp. Res. Part D Transp. Environ., vol. 112, no. October, p. 103466, 2022, doi: 10.1016/j.trd.2022.103466.

[24] T. T. Baker, C. Radel, L. Dale-Hallett, and C. Forge, “Photovoice, claiming visibility, and women’s farming identities in Australia,” Emot. Sp. Soc., vol. 41, no. October 2020, p. 100835, 2021, doi: 10.1016/j.emospa.2021.100835.

[25] S. Spencer, Visual Research Methods in the Social Sciences : Awakening Visions, 2nd ed. London and New York: Routledge, 2023.

[26] Ruslin, S. Mashuri, M. S. A. Rasak, F. Alhabsyi, and H. Syam, “Semi-structured Interview: A Methodological Reflection on the Development of a Qualitative Research Instrument in Educational Studies Ruslin,” J. Res. Method Educ., vol. 12, no. 1, pp. 22–29, 2022, doi: 10.9790/7388-1201052229.

[27] N. S. Venkateshmurthy et al., “A Photovoice Study to Reveal Community Perceptions of Highly Processed Packaged Foods in India,” Ecol. Food Nutr., vol. 60, no. 6, pp. 810–825, 2021, doi: 10.1080/03670244.2021.1968853.

[28] K. Anderson, E. Elder-Robinson, K. Howard, and G. Garvey, A Systematic Methods Review of Photovoice Research with Indigenous Young People, vol. 22. 2023. doi: 10.1177/16094069231172076.

[29] D. Mannay, Visual, Narrative and Creative Research Methods : Application, reflection and ethics, 1st ed. London and New York: Routledge, 2016.

[30] O. M. Kyololo, B. J. Stevens, and J. Songok, “Photo-Elicitation Technique: Utility and Challenges in Clinical Research,” Int. J. Qual. Methods, vol. 22, pp. 1–8, 2023, doi: 10.1177/16094069231165714.

[31] D. Regoczi and S. Shanmugam, “Methodological considerations and reflection on using online photo-elicitation techniques to explore students’ professional doctorate journey,” Int. J. Res. Method Educ., pp. 1–14, 2023, doi: 10.1080/1743727X.2023.2274323.

[32] P. A. Shaw, “Photo-elicitation and photo-voice: using visual methodological tools to engage with younger children’s voices about inclusion in education,” Int. J. Res. Method Educ., vol. 44, no. 4, pp. 337–351, 2021, doi: 10.1080/1743727X.2020.1755248.

[33] J. Cleland and A. MacLeod, “The visual vernacular: embracing photographs in research,” Perspect. Med. Educ., vol. 10, no. 4, pp. 230–237, 2021, doi: 10.1007/s40037-021-00672-x.

Downloads

Published

2024-12-05

Issue

Vol. 22 No. 2 (2024)

Section

Articles

License

Copyright (c) 2024 Arif Ardy Wibowo, Ana Nadhya Abrar, Ardian Indro Yuwono

Creative Commons License

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.

Copyright

Authors who publish with Gelar: Jurnal Seni Budaya agrees to the following terms:

  1. Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY-SA 4.0) that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgment of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal. 
  2. Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgment of its initial publication in this journal.
  3. Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work.