Development of sensory-based inclusive vocational modules in graphic design: a case study of neurodivergent learners in a vocational training institution
Main Article Content
Abstract
The purpose of this study is to develop a sensor-based vocational learning module that is appropriate for neurodivergent individuals such as those with autism, as well as those who are enrolled in the LPK ATC Widyatama Program Desain Grafis. This module integrates sensor-based learning strategies and natural stimulation to increase students' understanding and engagement. Drawing from Ayres' theory of sensor integration, Vygotsky's theory of sociocultural education, and TPACK's work ethics, this module aims to improve cognitive, affective, and psychomotor learning. This study employs a qualitative case study methodology based on Design Thinking principles, which helps students understand the learning context. Interviews, artifact analysis, and observation are used to assess the learning process and results. The study's findings indicate that individualized sensory stimulation, such as visual references from movies, television shows, and video games, helps consumers develop ideas into products graphic design. Among the things that are discussed are individual accommodations and the improvement of the instructional environment. This study offers a starting point for vocational education with recommendations for more comprehensive sensor integration.
Downloads
Article Details
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
Copyright
Authors who publish with Gelar: Jurnal Seni Budaya agrees to the following terms:
- Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY-SA 4.0) that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgment of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgment of its initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work.
References
[1] UNESCO, “Global Education Monitoring Report: Inclusion and Education,” UNESCO Publishing, Paris, France, 2020.
[2] World Health Organization, “Global Report on Assistive Technology,” WHO Press, Geneva, Switzerland, 2022.
[3] L. S. Vygotsky, Mind in Society: The Development of Higher Psychological Processes. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press, 1978.
[4] H. Daniels, Vygotsky and Pedagogy. London, UK: Routledge, 2001.
[5] S. Agrawal, “Disability classification using deep learning,” Educational Technology Research and Development, vol. 71, no. 4, pp. 1053–1074, 2023.
[6] H. Habib, “AI-based adaptive learning for students with disabilities,” Computers & Education, vol. 182, p. 104487, 2022.
[7] M. S. Ramaiah, “Technological innovation for inclusive learning,” Journal of Special Education Technology, vol. 40, no. 1, pp. 1–15, 2025.
[8] A. J. Ayres and J. Robbins, Sensory Integration and the Child: Understanding Hidden Sensory Challenges. Los Angeles, CA: Western Psychological Services, 2005.
[9] S. D. Tomchek and W. Dunn, “Sensory processing in autism,” American Journal of Occupational Therapy, vol. 61, no. 5, pp. 489–500, 2007.
[10] G. T. Baranek, “Sensory experiences and children with autism,” Journal of Autism and Developmental Disorders, vol. 43, no. 6, pp. 1358–1369, 2013.
[11] R. C. Schaaf and Z. Mailloux, “Sensory integration interventions for children with Autism spectrum disorders: A meta-analysis,” American Journal of Occupational Therapy, vol. 69, no. 5, pp. 1–10, 2015.
[12] M. Chen, T. Huang, and S. Cheng, “Interactive media in education: A systematic review of research in recent years,” Computers & Education, vol. 146, p. 103756, 2020.
[13] CAST, “Universal Design for Learning Guidelines Version 2.2,” Center for Applied Special Technology, Wakefield, MA, 2018.
[14] J. W. Creswell and C. N. Poth, Qualitative Inquiry and Research Design: Choosing Among Five Approaches, 4th ed. Thousand Oaks, CA: SAGE Publications, 2021.
[15] D. Henriksen, C. Richardson, and R. Mehta, “Design thinking in education: A systematic review of literature,” Thinking Skills and Creativity, vol. 38, p. 100715, 2020, doi: 10.1016/j.tsc.2020.100715.
[16] B. G. Cook and M. D. Bush, “Special education research and practice: Enhancing validity through contextual understanding,” Review of Educational Research, vol. 91, 2021.
[17] L. W. Anderson and D. R. Krathwohl, A Taxonomy for Learning, Teaching, and Assessing: A Revision of Bloom’s Taxonomy of Educational Objectives. New York, NY: Longman, 2001.
[18] M. E. Gorman and N. H. Kashani, “A. Jean Ayres and the development of sensory integration,” Social Epistemology, vol. 31, no. 2, pp. 107–129, 2017.
[19] C. S. Chai, J. H. L. Koh, and C.-C. Tsai, “A review of technological pedagogical content knowledge,” Educational Technology & Society, vol. 16, no. 2, pp. 31–51, 2013.
[20] C. T. Fosnot and R. S. Perry, “Constructivism: A psychological theory of learning,” in Second International Handbook of Science Education, B. J. Fraser, K. G. Tobin, and C. J. McRobbie, Eds., Dordrecht, Netherlands: Springer, 2021, pp. 43–53.