A qualitative photographic analysis of Guardian figures in Chinese temples in Bali: visual rhetoric and cultural hybridity
Main Article Content
Abstract
This study investigates how the guardian figures in Chinese temples across Bali visually represent cultural hybridity between Chinese religious traditions and Balinese symbolic aesthetics. Using a descriptive-interpretive qualitative approach based on the idea of visual rhetoric, this study examines seven temples across Balinese regencies. Photographic documentation and ethnographic interviews with temple representatives and craftsmen were conducted to collect data. In this sense, photography is a documentation tool, yet also a visual analysis method, providing a deeper interpretation of cultural negotiation. This study shows that while the guardian figures within the Chinese temples in Bali retain core Chinese iconographic elements, such as mythological animals and heroic deities, they also adopt Balinese traditional ornaments. Due to influenced by the both Chinese and Balinese heritage of the Chinese-Balinese community, these visual adaptations demonstrate a conscious integration of Balinese cultural identity within Chinese sacred forms. In this sense, guardian figures play a significant role as visual intermediaries within sacred spaces, representing both protective symbolism and the spatial hierarchy of the temple’s design. Ultimately, this study contributes to the understanding of transcultural religious design and provides insights into the role of visual culture as a medium of spiritual expression and the construction of hybrid identity within a multicultural urban environment.
Downloads
Article Details
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
Copyright
Authors who publish with Gelar: Jurnal Seni Budaya agrees to the following terms:
- Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY-SA 4.0) that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgment of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgment of its initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work.
References
[1] N. L. S. Beratha and I. W. Ardika, “10 Interreligious Relationships between Chinese and Hindu Balinese in Three Villages in Bali,” in Between Harmony and Discrimination: Negotiating Religious Identities within Majority-Minority Relationships in Bali and Lombok, BRILL, 2014, pp. 258–274. doi: 10.1163/9789004271494_012
[2] Sulistyawati, “Pengaruh Kebudayaan Tionghoa terhadap Peradaban Budaya Bali,” in Integrasi Budaya Tionghoa ke Dalam Budaya Bali dan Indonesia (Sebuah Bunga Rampai), Bali: Udayana University Press, 2011.
[3] I. Winaja, I. Prabawa, and P. Pertiwi, “Acculturation and its effects on the religious and ethnic values of Bali’s Catur village community,” J. Soc. Stud. Educ. Res., vol. 10, no. 3, pp. 249–275, 2019.
[4] B. Hauser-Schäublin, “From Subandar to Tridharma: Transformations and Interactions of Chinese Communities in Bali,” in Between Harmony and Discrimination: Negotiating Religious Identities within Majority-Minority Relationships in Bali and Lombok, BRILL, 2014, pp. 84–111. doi: 10.1163/9789004271494_005
[5] F. B. Eiseman, “Bali: Sekala and Niskala. Volume I: Essays on Religion, Ritual, and Art,” Berkeley: Periplus Editions. 1990.
[6] I. B. A. Wicaksana, “Historical Temple of Dalem Balingkang: A Balinese Chinese Acculturation,” Bali Tour. J., vol. 5, no. 1, pp. 5–9, Apr. 2021, doi: 10.36675/btj.v5i1.51.
[7] A. A. G. Raka, N. Anoegrajekti, P. N. S. Yasa, S. Macaryus, and A. A. G. R. Gunawarman, “Bali is Dressing-Up: Ritual as an Identity,” J. Environ. Manag. Tour., vol. 11, no. 6, p. 1560, Sep. 2020, doi: 10.14505/jemt.v11.6(46).26.
[8] M. Sulistyawati, “Integrasi Arsitektur Tionghoa ke dalam Arsitektur Puri Agung Karangasem,” Integrasi Budaya Tionghoa pada Budaya Bali, Udayana University, Bali. 2008.
[9] A. Achmadi, “The Other Side of Tropical Paradise: Traces of Modernism within the Vernacular Landscapes of Early Twentieth-Century Bali,” Architecture Beyond Europe Journal, no. 10. pp. 9–10, 12-Jul-2016, doi: 10.4000/abe.3211.
[10] F. Hendrawan and D. Beynon, “An Evaluation of the Implementation of Chinese Temple Layout Principles in Bali, Indonesia,” ISVS e-journal, vol. 6, no. 4, pp. 55–63, 2019.
[11] F. Hendrawan and D. Beynon, “An Identification of hybrid architecture in Tri Dharma temples in Bali,” in The International Conference on Chinese Indonesian Cultural Heritage Proceedings, Surabaya, Indonesia: Petra Christian University, 2021.
[12] F. Hendrawan, R. D. S. Dinata, I. G. Y. Pratama, I. P. G. Suyoga, and I. A. O. Ambarawati, “A Symbolical Model of Together in Difference: Classifying Tri Dharma Temple Architecture in Bali,” Civ. Eng. Archit., vol. 13, no. 2, pp. 881–898, Mar. 2025, doi: 10.13189/cea.2025.130210.
[13] I. G. A. R. P. Dasih, I. B. G. Y. Triguna, and I. W. Winaja, “Intercultural communication based on ideology, theology and sociology,” Int. J. Linguist. Lit. Cult., vol. 5, no. 5, pp. 29–35, Sep. 2019, doi: 10.21744/ijllc.v5n5.738.
[14] A. A. G. Raka, I. M. Mardika, N. M. Wahyuni, and A. A. I. M. Warmadewi, “Chinese Ancient Coin - Uang kepeng: A Strengthener of Bali and China Relationship,” J. Environ. Manag. Tour., vol. 11, no. 2, p. 271, Apr. 2020, doi: 10.14505//jemt.v11.2(42).05.
[15] N. I. Wu and A. Boyd, “Chinese Architecture and Town Planning: 1500 B.C.-A.D. 1911,” Artibus Asiae, vol. 28, no. 1, p. 68, 1966, doi: 10.2307/3249319.
[16] E. Lip, “Chinese temple architecture,” Archit., vol. 94, no. 3, pp. 27–29, 1987.
[17] E. Lip, Feng Shui: A Layman’s Guide. Times Editions, 2004.
[18] F. Shui, Environments of power, a study of chinese architecture. Academy, 1995.
[19] Y. U. Yan and Y. Zaijun, “Analysis on Fengshui theory and urban planning in ancient China,” Can. Soc. Sci., vol. 12, no. 1, pp. 42–48, 2016.
[20] B. Jiang, “Chinese gates of Late Imperial China in the context of cosmo-religious rituals.” University of Sheffield, 2014.
[21] D. G. Kohl, “Chinese architecture in the Straits Settlements and Western Malaya,” 香港大學學位論文. 香港大學, pp. 0–1, 1978.
[22] Akmalia, S. Meliana, S. Pramono, R. R. Rihadiani, and H. P. Kharisma, “Intercultural Adaptation of Chinese Culture to The Elements of City Planning on The North Coast of Java (Case Study: Jin De Yuan and Tay Kak Sie Temple),” IOP Conf. Ser. Earth Environ. Sci., vol. 1324, no. 1, p. 012015, Apr. 2024, doi: 10.1088/1755-1315/1324/1/012015.
[23] C. Xing and S. Xiaoqian, “Study on mountain Confucian temple spatial layout and landscape environment: an analytical study of Confucian temples in Southwest China during the 15th-19th centuries,” J. Asian Archit. Build. Eng., vol. 22, no. 5, pp. 2643–2659, Sep. 2023, doi: 10.1080/13467581.2022.2160639.
[24] R. Trisno and F. Lianto, “Form expression of ‘Kelenteng Hok Tek Bio ’ Chinese temple related to the function, building structure, and symbol,” Cogent Eng., vol. 10, no. 1, Dec. 2023, doi: 10.1080/23311916.2023.2166200.
[25] E. T. Fortino and T. E. Darmayanti, “Study Of Narration on Satya Budhi Temple’s Gate in Bandung,” Idealog Ide dan Dialog Desain Indones., vol. 8, no. 1, pp. 103–123, Apr. 2023, doi: 10.25124/idealog.v8i1.5600.
[26] A. Wasta, T. R. Rohidi, A. Cahyono, and U. Utomo, “Cultural Interactions in Sunda Karawitan Vernacular Music Practice: Forms of Cultural Adaptations among the Chinese Community at Padepokan Pasundan Asih, Bandung, Indonesia,” Int. Soc. Study Vernac. Settlements, vol. 11, no. 7, pp. 114–125, Jul. 2024, doi: 10.61275/ISVSej-2024-11-07-08.
[27] L. Suryadinata, Peranakan Chinese Identities in the Globalizing Malay Archipelago. ISEAS–Yusof Ishak Institute Singapore, 2022. doi: 10.1355/9789814951708
[28] S. Triatmodjo, M. A. Burhan, H. B. Prasetya, E. Budiarti, and H. Fernando, “Cultural hybridization in the veneration of a Javanese local hero as a kongco at Lasem’s Gie Yong Bio Chinese temple during Indonesia’s reformation Era,” Cogent Arts Humanit., vol. 10, no. 1, Dec. 2023, doi: 10.1080/23311983.2023.2254045.
[29] I. N. Gelebet, Arsitektur Tradisional Daerah Bali. Denpasar: Departemen Pendidikan dan Kebudayaan, 1986.
[30] P. P. Y. A. Pratama, M. Jazuli, I. W. Adnyana, and A. Cahyono, “Ideologi Maskulinitas dalam Pewarisan Tari Baris di Desa Adat Batur Bali,” in Prosiding Seminar Nasional Pascasarjana, 2022, vol. 5, no. 1, pp. 863–870.
[31] S. K. Foss, Rhetorical criticism: Exploration and practice. Waveland Press, 2017.
[32] A. Danaeinia, “The sense of entrance to a place in kashan historical houses,” J. Archit. Urban., vol. 45, no. 1, pp. 38–49, Feb. 2021, doi: 10.3846/jau.2021.13209.
[33] M. Khanzadeh, “Aesthetic and functional analysis of mosque entrance areas in Ottoman and Safavid Empires: a comparative study,” Cogent Arts Humanit., vol. 11, no. 1, Dec. 2024, doi: 10.1080/23311983.2024.2313262.
[34] Z. J. Wang, “Door God worship and door god belief.” Shanghai Joint Publishing Press, 1996.
[35] W. Zheng, “The analytical methodology of Lun Heng.” Bashu Publishing House, 1999.
[36] T.-C. Su, T.-C. Wu, M.-H. Wun, and C.-W. Wang, “Style Recognition of Door God Paintings by Hypothesis Testing for Texture Features of Painting Patterns,” Appl. Sci., vol. 12, no. 5, p. 2637, Mar. 2022, doi: 10.3390/app12052637.
[37] M. R. Matthews, “Feng Shui Practice,” in Feng Shui: Teaching about science and pseudoscience, Springer International Publishing, 2019, pp. 65–90. doi: 10.1007/978-3-030-18822-1_4
[38] M. Loehr, “The fate of the ornament in Chinese art,” Arch. Asian Art, vol. 21, pp. 8–19, 1967.
[39] S. Susetyo and A. Indrajaja, “The Relative Dating and Art Style of the Dwārapāla Statues of the Adan-Adan Temple,” in Proceedings of the 9th Asbam International Conference (Archeology, History, & Culture In The Nature of Malay), 2022, doi: 10.2991/assehr.k.220408.028.
[40] I. N. W. Paramadhyaksa, I. G. A. B. Suryada, and I. B. Primayatna, “Konsepsi Oposisi Biner Dalam Pengarcaan Pasangan Dwarapala Pada Kori Agung Di Bali,” in Forum Arkeologi, 2013, vol. 26, no. 2, pp. 153–168.
[41] J. Liang, R. Guo, and Y. He, “A Psychological Analysis of the Imagery of Chinese Menshen,” Cult. Psychol., vol. 28, no. 4, pp. 527–549, Dec. 2022, doi: 10.1177/1354067X221097607.
[42] J. Belo, “Bali: rangda and barong.” JJ Augustin, 1949.
[43] M. Chan, “Bodies for the Gods: Image worship in Chinese popular religion,” 2012.