An integrated socio-institutional model for visual arts development and policy formulation in Medan, Indonesia

Main Article Content

Zulkifli Zulkifli
Anam Ibrahim
Azmi Azmi
Barli Kifli
Lanang Riyadi

Abstract

Visual art activities in Medan City, Indonesia, have a long-standing history, yet over the past decade, the ecosystem has experienced a significant decline, indicated by decreasing artist participation, a lack of periodic exhibitions, and underutilized infrastructure. Previous studies have primarily focused on the creative aspects of local cultural identity, leaving a critical research gap regarding the socio-institutional factors and policy frameworks required to sustain the arts ecosystem. This study employs a mixed methods descriptive-qualitative approach to formulate an evidence based development model and policy concept for Medan. Data were collected through observations, surveys of 36 practitioners, and in-depth interviews with 12 key stakeholders. Empirical findings reveal a severe coordination gap among artists, public appreciators, and local government, as well as a lack of physical and digital infrastructure. To address this, we propose an Integrated Socio-Institutional Model that synergizes the domains of creation, presentation, and art research. The novelty of this research lies in shifting the focus from isolated artistic production to a comprehensive, interconnected ecosystem approach that includes digital integration (NFTs). The theoretical contribution expands the sociology of art by embedding municipal policy frameworks, while the practical contribution provides a hierarchical policy blueprint (prioritizing the establishment of a coordinating body and the revitalization of creative centers) to enhance the sustainability and economic impact of Medan's visual arts scene.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Article Details

Section
Articles

References

[1] Z. Zulkifli, A. Ibrahim, M. Pasaribu, and B. K. Amal, “The Revitalization of Iconic Shapes through the Creation of Relief Dimensional Paintings as Tourism Software Products (Case Study in Medan City, Indonesia),” Randwick Int. Soc. Sci. J., vol. 2, no. 4, pp. 450–460, Oct. 2021, doi: 10.47175/rissj.v2i4.291.

[2] and C. T. E. Kent, V. Hooker, Living Art: Indonesian Artists Engage Politics, Society and History. ANU Press, 2022.

[3] B. Darmawan, L. Hakim, E. Regita Cahyani Nazra, F. Puji Azizah, Z. Praja Nata, and Irno, “The Changing Face of Padang: History of Urban Shape and Spatial Structure,” El Tarikh J. Hist. Cult. Islam. Civiliz., vol. 6, no. 1, pp. 64–77, May 2025, doi: 10.24042/00202561752800.

[4] S. J. Kassim and I. Ibrahim, Urban-Architectural Forms of Historic Southeast Asia. London: Routledge, 2025, doi: 10.4324/9781003470045.

[5] G. A. Ariwibowo and I. Fibiona, “Sustainable Urban Cultural Heritage Policy in the City of Yogyakarta, Indonesia,” J. Herit. Manag., vol. 10, no. 1, pp. 67–85, Jun. 2025, doi: 10.1177/24559296241302986.

[6] D. R. Susanto, A. Kiswantoro, S. Supina, T. Hendratono, and N. Rohman, “Strategic Management of Cultural Heritage: Enhancing Memorable Tourist Experiences through Cultural Appreciation in Yogyakarta,” Herit. Soc., pp. 1–24, Feb. 2026, doi: 10.1080/2159032X.2026.2626634.

[7] L. Zhang and T. Shen, “Integrating Sustainability into Contemporary Art and Design: An Interdisciplinary Approach,” Sustainability, vol. 16, no. 15, p. 6539, Jul. 2024, doi: 10.3390/su16156539.

[8] L. Jin, “Research on the Integration of Traditional Arts and Crafts into the Design of Modern Cultural and Creative Products,” 2022, doi: 10.2991/assehr.k.220109.075.

[9] S. Bishop, “Influencer creep: How artists strategically navigate the platformisation of art worlds,” New Media Soc., vol. 27, no. 4, pp. 2109–2126, Apr. 2025, doi: 10.1177/14614448231206090.

[10] P. Mangset and B. Kleppe, “How do artists at risk of poverty navigate economic and professional insecurity?,” Cult. Trends, pp. 1–16, Jul. 2025, doi: 10.1080/09548963.2025.2539715.

[11] J. Woronkowicz, “The Labor Market Behavior of Cultural Entrepreneurs,” Found. Trends® Entrep., vol. 21, no. 4–5, pp. 417–440, Apr. 2025, doi: 10.1561/0300000132-4.

[12] I. L. Pop, A. Borza, A. Buiga, D. Ighian, and R. Toader, “Achieving Cultural Sustainability in Museums: A Step Toward Sustainable Development,” Sustainability, vol. 11, no. 4, p. 970, Feb. 2019, doi: 10.3390/su11040970.

[13] M. Papageorgiou and S. Apostolaki, “Culture, identity preservation and sustainability,” in New Economics for Sustainability, Elsevier, 2026, pp. 715–737, doi: 10.1016/B978-0-443-27396-4.00009-9.

[14] Z. Poposki, “Elucidating the paradox of sustainable art consumption: an interdisciplinary analysis,” Creat. Ind. J., vol. 19, no. 1, pp. 30–47, Jan. 2026, doi: 10.1080/17510694.2024.2313267.

[15] K. Kasemsarn, A. Sawadsri, A. Kritsanaphan, and F. Nickpour, “Urban Branding Through Cultural–Creative Tourism: A Review of Youth Engagement for Sustainable Development,” Urban Sci., vol. 9, no. 6, p. 204, Jun. 2025, doi: 10.3390/urbansci9060204.

[16] C. Bohn, “Contemporary Art and Event-Based Social Theory,” Theory, Cult. Soc., vol. 39, no. 3, pp. 51–74, May 2022, doi: 10.1177/02632764211042085.

[17] S. Marguin, “Architecture and sociology: A sociogenesis of interdisciplinary referencing,” in Forum Qualitative Sozialforschung/Forum: Qualitative Social Research, 2021, vol. 22, no. 3.

[18] S. D. Bedir Erişti and K. Freedman, “Integrating Digital Technologies and AI in Art Education: Pedagogical Competencies and the Evolution of Digital Visual Culture,” Particip. Educ. Res., vol. 11, no. H. Ferhan Odabaşı Gift Issue, pp. 57–79, Dec. 2024, doi: 10.17275/per.24.94.11.6.

[19] M. S. VV, “Critical introduction to visual culture artists: Navigating Postmodernism and Deconstruction in artistic expression,” Demagogi J. Soc. Sci. Econ. Educ., vol. 3, no. 5, pp. 374–387, 2025.

[20] M. B. Miles, A. M. Huberman, and J. Saldaña, Qualitative Data Analysis: A Methods Sourcebook. Sage, 2014.

[21] S. Hadley, “Artists as cultural intermediaries? Remediating practices of production and consumption,” Arts Mark., vol. 11, no. 3, pp. 200–216, Oct. 2021, doi: 10.1108/AAM-01-2021-0001.

[22] E. M. Power, “An Introduction to Pierre Bourdieu’s Key Theoretical Concepts,” J. Study Food Soc., vol. 3, no. 1, pp. 48–52, Mar. 1999, doi: 10.2752/152897999786690753.

[23] M. Hilgers and E. Mangez, “Introduction to Pierre Bourdieu’s theory of social fields,” in Bourdieu’s theory of social fields, Routledge, 2014, pp. 1–36, doi: 10.4324/9781315772493.

[24] J. W. Mohr, “Bourdieu’s Relational Method in Theory and in Practice: From Fields and Capitals to Networks and Institutions (and Back Again),” in Applying Relational Sociology, New York: Palgrave Macmillan US, 2013, pp. 101–135, doi: 10.1057/9781137407009_5.

[25] W. Wu, Z. Ji, and H. Liang, “The Impact of New infrastructure Construction on Optimization and Upgrading of Industrial Structure,” Buildings, vol. 13, no. 10, p. 2580, Oct. 2023, doi: 10.3390/buildings13102580.

[26] A. Gondia, M. Ezzeldin, and W. El-Dakhakhni, “Dynamic networks for resilience-driven management of infrastructure projects,” Autom. Constr., vol. 136, p. 104149, Apr. 2022, doi: 10.1016/j.autcon.2022.104149.

[27] N. Millington and S. Scheba, “Day Zero and The Infrastructures of Climate Change: Water Governance, Inequality, and Infrastructural Politics in Cape Town’s Water Crisis,” Int. J. Urban Reg. Res., vol. 45, no. 1, pp. 116–132, Jan. 2021, doi: 10.1111/1468-2427.12899.

[28] L. Candy and E. Edmonds, “The studio and living laboratory models for practice-based research,” in The Routledge International Handbook of Practice-Based Research, London: Routledge, 2021, pp. 75–91, doi: 10.4324/9780429324154-6.

[29] M. D. Vasco, E. Chissano, and F. Mitano, “Local governance in the COVID-19 response: Challenges, strategies, and lessons – a multinational integrative review,” Res. Soc. Dev., vol. 14, no. 7, p. e3014749187, Jul. 2025, doi: 10.33448/rsd-v14i7.49187.

[30] G. Xin and J. Chen, “Decentralized governance and collective action dilemma: Sub‐national governments’ responses to COVID‐19 in China,” Public Adm. Dev., vol. 43, no. 2, pp. 163–175, May 2023, doi: 10.1002/pad.2004.

[31] P. Aversa, E. Bianchi, L. Gaio, and A. Nucciarelli, “The Grand Tour: The Role of Catalyzing Places for Industry Emergence,” Acad. Manag. J., vol. 65, no. 6, pp. 2058–2091, Dec. 2022, doi: 10.5465/amj.2019.1303.

[32] A. Iyer, “Cultural dialogues and the evolution of artistic practices in global contexts,” Eur. Rev. Contemp. Arts Humanit., vol. 1, no. 1, pp. 20–23, 2025.

[33] Z. Zulkifli, D. Sembiring, and M. Pasaribu, “Tradisi dalam Modernisasi Seni Lukis Sumatera Utara: Eksplorasi Kreatif Berbasis Etnisitas Batak Toba,” Mudra J. Seni Budaya, vol. 35, no. 3, pp. 352–359, Sep. 2020, doi: 10.31091/mudra.v35i3.878.