PENERIMAAN KHALAYAK DESA PONGGOL MAGELANGTERHADAP PROGRAM GENDU-GENDU ROSO GRABAGTV

Authors

  • Reni Diyah Yulita Mahasiswa Program Studi S-1 Televisi dan Film, FSRD Institut Seni Indonesia (ISI) Surakarta Jl. Ringroad Km 5.5 Mojosongo, Surakarta 57127
  • Fitri Murfianti Dosen Program Studi S-1 Desain KomunikasiVisual, FSRD Institut Seni Indonesia (ISI) Surakarta Jl. Ringroad Km 5.5 Mojosongo, Surakarta 57127

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.33153/capture.v3i2.1891

Abstract

GrabagTV is one of community televisions that has been operated in Indonesia.It wasestablished in 2004 in District Grabag, Magelang regency, Central Java. Grabag TV is noncommercial television. One of programs that aired is Gendu-Gendu Roso.This program is aninteractive dialogue aimed as a space to accommodate the aspirations of the people Grabag.This problem is then focused on how the public acceptance of the program Gendu-Gendu Rosoas a medium channeling the aspirations of the people in accordance with the goals and ideals ofIndonesia broadcasters.The purpose of this study is how the reader understand on how thepublic acceptance of the program being broadcasted on television community and the factorsthat affect the acceptance of the audience. This thesis using qualitative methods and theapproach used is reception analysis.This approach is used in order to determine how audiencesreceive the contents of the messages conveyed by the media viewed from a variety ofcontextual factors that influence.Audience acceptance will be obtained by a long process thatbecame valuable experience within the public and shaping the mindset and worldview different.The results of this study show that community acceptance of Gendu Gendu Roso in defendingfreedom of speech in the category dominant reception where the community agreed that theevent was able to become the voice of the container,as well as public acceptance of the use ofsetting events are also included in the reception dominant. While the acceptance of theaudience to the information included in the reception is dominant and negotiated.The lastdiscussion on the use of regional languages in the event showed that the acceptance of theaudience entered the reception is dominant,negotiated and oppositional.For people who fallinto the category of oppositional means that the use of the local language cannot be receivedwell.Public acceptance of the programs shown on television was not the same community.It isinfluenced by various factors in daily life such as social background, occupation, age, sex andneighborhood audiences.Keywords: Community television, audiences positioning, and Grabag TV

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Ahmad Rosyadi. 2002. Studi Respon Masyarakat Terhadap Televisi

Komunitas AMTV di Desa Palampitan Kecamatan Amuntai Tengah

Kabupaten Hulu Sungai Utara. Skripsi tidak diterbitkan. Universitas

Muhammadiyah Malang.

Burton,Graeme.2007.MembicangkanTelevisi. Jala Sutra:Yogyakarta.

______. 2008. Yang Tersembunyi di Balik Media. Yogyakarta & Bandung: Jala Sutra.

Elvinaro Ardianto. 2005. Komunikasi Massa Suatu Pengantar. Bandung: Simbiosa Rekatama Media.

Fred Wibowo. 2007. Produksi ProgramTelevisi. Bandung:Remaja Rosda Karya.

H.B Sutopo. 2006. Metodologi Penelitian Kualitatif (DasarTeori danTerapannya Dalam Penelitian). Surakarta: Universtas Sebelas Maret Press.

Hikmat Kusumaningrat. 2007. Jurnalistik Teori dan Praktik. Bandung: Remaja Rosda Karya.

Himawan Pratista. 2008. Memahami Film. Yogyakarta:Homerian Pustaka.

Koentjaraningrat. 1990. Pengantar Ilmu Antropologi.Jakarta:Rineka Cipta.

Marselli Sumarno.1996.Dasar-dasar Apresiasi Film.Jakarta:Grasindo.

Masduki. 1989. Radio Siaran dan Demokratisasi.Yogyakarta:Jendela.

Morissan MA. 2008. Manajemen Media Penyiaran. Jakarta: Prenada Media Grup.

Onong Uchjana.1993.Televisi SiaranTeori dan Praktek.Bandung:Mandar Maju.

Pawito. 2007. Penelitian Komunikasi Kualitatif. Yogyakarta:Lkis.

Ruedi Hoffman. 1999. Dasar-Dasar Apresiasi ProgramTelevisi.Jakarta:Grasindo.

Storey, John. 2008. Cultural Studies dan Kajian Budaya Pop.Yogyakarta:Jalasutra.

Tri Nugroho Adi. 2008. Identitas Kultural dan Televisi Lokal (StudiTentang Konstruksi dan Representasi Identitas Kultural

dalam Tayangan Banyumas TV). Tesis tidak diterbitkan.Universitas Negeri Sebelas Maret Surakarta.

Totok Sumaryanto. 2007. Pendekatan Kuantitatif dan Kualitatif dalam Penelitian Pendidikan Seni. Semarang: UNNES PRES:.

Umar Kayam. 1999. Ketika Orang Jawa Nyeni. Yogyakarta: Galang Press dan YayasanAdi Karya.

Wawan Kuswandi. 1996. Komunikasi Massa (Sebuah Analisis Media Televisi). Jakarta:Rineka Cipta.

Williams, Raymond. 2008. Televisi.Yogyakarta: Resist Book.

Hartanto.“Peran StrategisTelevisi Komunitas Dalam Pemberdayaan Masyarakat†dalam Dewa Ruci, Jurnal Penciptaan Seni,Vol. 6,No.2,Juli 2010.

Ido Prijana Hadi.“Penelitian Khalayak dalam Perspektif Reception Analysis†dalam Jurnal ilmiah SCRIPTURA,Vol. 2,No.1,

Jurusan Ilmu Komunikasi, Fakultas Ilmu Komunikasi, Universitas

Kristen Petra,Januari 2008.

http://www.pewar ta-kabar indonesia.blogspot.com/ diakses pada 10 September 2010.

http://www.kpi.go.id/download/regulasi/UU No.32 tahun 2002 tentang penyiaran diakses pada 10 September 2010.

http://www.grabagtv.blogspot.com diakses pada 25 September 2010.

www.facebook.com/GrabagTV diakses 25 September 2010.

http://www.puslit.universitaspetra.ac.id/communication diakses pada 23 Pebruari 2011.

http://www.wikipedia.com/komunikasi diakses pada 19 Mei 2011.

http://www.facebook.com/kickandy diakses pada 6 Juni 2011.

http://www.mediakita.blogspot.com diakses pada 6 Juni 2011.

Narasumber:

Hartanto, dosen, pendiri Grabag TV,

Magelang

Maryoso, produser Gendu-gendu Roso,

Magelang

Dewi,pengurus GrabagTV,Magelang

Downloads

Published

2017-06-19

Issue

Section

Articles