A CONCEPTUAL FRAMEWORK FOR QUALITATIVE RESEARCH: A LITERATURE STUDIES

Guntur Guntur

Abstract


The conceptual framework is an important part of a research. However, there is still a lot of research, especially among students who ignore it. Indeed the conceptual framework has a strategic position and role in research. This article discusses about the conceptual framework in qualitative research. Specifically, it is aimed at providing understanding and practical guidance for students who will and / or are preparing research plans for their final assignments. This article consists of four main section / part. The first section discusses the understanding of research and research frameworks. The second section discusses the conceptual framework in qualitative research. The third section discusses how to develop / arrange a conceptual framework for qualitative research. The final chapter is a conclusion.

 


Keywords


framework;conceptual framework;qualitative research

Full Text:

PDF

References


DAFTAR ACUAN

Buku:

Biggs, B. and Karlsson. H. (Ed.). 2011. The Routledge Companion to Research in the Arts, London and New York: Routledge.

Chinn, P.L. and Kramer, M.K. (Eds.). 1999. Theory and Nursing: A Systematic Approach. 5th Edition. St Louis: Mosby.

Crotty, M. 2003. The Foundations of Social Research: Meaning and Perspective in the Research Process. 3rd ed. London: Sage Publication.

deMarris, K. and Lapan, S. D. (Eds.). 2004. Foundation for Research: Methods of Inquiry in Education and the Social Sciences. Mahwah, New Jersey, London: Lawrence Erlbaum Associate Publhisers.

Flick, U. 2010. An Introduction to Qualitative Research. Fourth Edition. London, Thousand Oaks, New Delhi, Singapore: Sage Publications Ltd.

George, M. W. 2008. The Elements of Library Research: What Every Student Needs To Know, Princeton and Oxford: Princeton University Press.

Guba, E. G. and Lincoln, Y. S. 1994. “Competing Paradigms in Qualitative Research”. In Denzin, N.K. and Lincoln. (Eds.). Handbook of Qualitative Research. Thousand Oaks: Sage Publication. (pp: 105-117)

Guntur. 2016. Metode Penelitian Artistik. Surakarta: ISI Press.

Krippendor, K. 2004. Content Analysis: An Introduction to Its Methodology. Thousand Oaks, London, New Delhi: Sage Publications.

Kuhn, T. S. 1970. The Structure of Scientific Revolutions. 2nd ed. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.

Merriam, S. B. 1998. Qualitative Research and Case Study Applications in Education. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.

Merriam, S. B. and Simpson, E. L. (Eds.). 2000. A Guide to Research for Educators and Trainers of Adults. (Updated 2nd, Edition). Malabar, FL: Krieger.

Miles, M. B. and Huberman, A. M. (Eds.). (1994). Qualitative Data Analysis. Second Edition. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publication.

Neuman, W. L. 2007. Basics of Social Research: Qualitative and Quantitative Approaches, Boston: Pearson Education, Inc.

O’Leary, Z. 2004. The Essential Guide to Doing Research. London, Thousand Oaks, New Delhi: Sage Publications.

Patton, M. 1990. Qualitative Evaluation and Research Methods. Sage: Newbury Park.

Somekh, B. and Lewin, C. (Eds.) 2005. Research Methods in The Social Sciences, London, Thousand Oaks, New Delhi: Sage Publications.

Strauss, A. L. and Corbin, J. M. (Eds.). 1998. Basics of Qualitative Research: Techniques and Procedures for Developing Grounded Theory, Thousand Oaks, London, New Delhi: Sage Publications.

Turner, J. H. (Ed.). 2001. Handbook of Sociological Theory, New York: Springer.

Jurnal Ilmiah:

Berman, J. 2013. “Utility of a conceptual framework within doctoral study: A researcher’s reflections”. Issues in Educational Research, 23(1), 1-18. http://www.iier.org.au/iier23/berman.pdf.

Bowen, G. A. 2006. “Grounded Theory and Sensitizing Concepts”. International Journal of Qualitative Methods”, 5(3), 12-23. DOI: 10.1177/160940690600500304.

Bowen, G. A. 2009. “Document Analysis as a Qualitative Research Method”. Qualitative Research Journal, 9(2), 27-40. DOI:10.3316/QRJ0902027.

Collins, C. S. and Stockton, C. M. 2018. “The Central Role of Theory in Qualitative Research”. International Journal of Qualitative Methods. 17(1), 1–10. DOI: 10.1177/1609406918797475.

Jabareen, Y. “Building a Conceptual Framework: Philosophy, Definitions, and Procedure”. International Journal of Qualitative Methods, 8(4), 2009: 49-62. DOI: 10.1177/160940690900800406

Lester, Jr. Frank K. 2005. “On the theoretical, conceptual, and philosophical foundations for research in mathematics education”. ZDM, 37(6), 457-467. DOI:10.1007/BF02655854.

Liehr, P. and Smith, M. J. 1999. “Middle range theory: Spinning research and practice to create knowledge for the new millennium.” Advances in Nursing Science, 21(4), 81-91. DOI: 10.1097/00012272-199906000-00011.

Lofland, J. H. 1974. "Styles of Reporting Qualitative Field Research," American Sociologist, 9(3), 101-111.

Mertens, D. M. 2012. “What Comes First? The Paradigm or the Approach?”. Journal of Mixed Methods Research, 6(4), 255–257. DOI: 10.1177/1558689812461574.

Reeves, S., Albert, M., Kuper, A., and Hodges, B. D. 2008. “Qualitative Research: Why use theories in qualitative research?”. The British Medical Journal (BMJ). 337, 631-634. DOI:10.1136/bmj.a949.

Rocco, T. S. and Plakhotnik, M. S. 2009. “Literature Reviews, Conceptual Frameworks, and Theoretical Frameworks: Terms, Functions, and Distinctions”. Human Resource Development Review, 8(1), 120-130. DOI: 10.1177/1534484309332617.




DOI: https://doi.org/10.33153/capture.v10i2.2447

Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.


Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License

Capture has been Indexed by :


garudadikti.png   isjd.png sinta.png copernicusisi.png doaj.png

crossref.png                     

            

      

Capture Impact Factor


2338-428X (e-ISSN)      2086-308X (p-ISSN)