PETITION AS INDONESIAN FILM’S ROBBER: Theodor Adorno’s Perspective on Majority-Leaning Group’s Criticisms
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.33153/capture.v13i1.3631Keywords:
Adorno, alienation, Indonesia, petition, filmAbstract
Filmmakers have felt the impact of numerous films that have been petitioned or rejected by groups acting in the majority’s interests. The groups carry religious issues and view films as a new force capable of undermining the values (dogma) they believe. The views were infiltrated by efforts to homogenize discourses for a particular purpose rather than pure objectivity, resulting in petitions opposing certain films. In this regard, Adorno’s perspective on the revolutionary objective basis leads to the eradication of critical thinking against individuals associated with capitalism. The term “capitalists” refer to persons who control the Indonesian film industry. The underlying phenomena of this research are alienation and oppression, and the research sources are film industry actors who are directly affected by the phenomena above. Using Bogdan’s and Taylor’s qualitative approach in Moleong (2018), this study reveals that capitalists attempt to paralyze the joints of critical thinking to steer Indonesian films toward uniform themes, namely religious ones, that are “safe” from mass organizations’ petitions and rejections. These efforts mark the end of critical thinking and ideas in the creative filmmaking process.Downloads
References
Adorno, T. W., & Horkheimer, M. (2002). Dialectic of Enlightenment. California: Stanford University Press.
Afrisia, R. S. (2015, Desember). Di Balik Industri Kreatif Korea yang Mendunia. CNN Indonesia. Retrieved from https://www.cnnindonesia.com/hiburan/20151213144912-220-97880/di-balik-industri-kreatif-korea-yang-mendunia
Ahy. (2014, Desember). Putar Film ‘Senyap.’ Detiknews.Com. Retrieved from https://news.detik.com/berita-jawa-tengah/d-2780816/putar-film-senyap-kampus-isi-yogyakarta-digeruduk-massa-bergamis
Amindoni, A. (2017, November 27). Mengapa Film Naura dan Genk Juara Menuai Kontroversi? BBC Indonesia. Retrieved from https://www.bbc.com/indonesia/majalah-42108219>
Arbar, T. F. (2020, February 10). Boyong 4 Piala Oscar, Ini Sederet Prestasi Film 'Parasite’. CNN Indonesia. Retrieved from https://www.cnbcindonesia.com/lifestyle/20200210122213-33-136616/boyong-4-piala-oscar-ini-sederet-prestasi-film-parasite>
Ariefana, P. (2020, February 15). Ribuan Anggota FPI Turun ke Jalan Demo Mal: Bioskop Sumber Kemaksiatan. Suara Jatim. Retrieved from https://jatim.suara.com/read/2020/02/15/060000/ribuan-anggota-fpi-turun-ke-jalan-demo-mal-bioskop-sumber-kemaksiatan>
Bramanti, B. (2020, March 6). Wawancara dengan Penulis Naskah Naura dan Genk Juara.
Diananto, W. (2019, Mei). Kontroversi Film Dua Garis Biru, Produser: Materi Film Saya Positif. Liputan 6.Com. Retrieved from https://www.liputan6.com/showbiz/read/3955214/kontroversi-film-dua-garis-biru-produser-materi-film-saya-positif>
Farouk, Y., & Yuliani. (2019, September 17). Ditolak FPI di Semarang, Film Kucumbu Tubuh Indahku Dikirim ke Oscar. Suara.Com. Retrieved from https://www.suara.com/entertainment/2019/09/17/192740/ditolak-fpi-di-semarang-film-kucumbu-tubuh-indahku-dikirim-ke-oscar>
Isfansyah, I. (2020, March 6). Wawancara dengan Produser Film “Kucumbu Tubuh Indahku.”
Moleong, L. J. (2018). Metode Penelitian Kualitatif. Bandung: PT. Remaja Rosdakarya.
Piliang, Y. A. (2011). Dunia Yang Dilipat: Tamasya Melampaui Batas-Batas Kebudayaan. Bandung: Matahari.
Pratama, A. F. (2011, Agustus). FPI Senang SCTV Batal Tayangkan Film Tanda Tanya. Tribunnews.Com. Retrieved from https://www.tribunnews.com/nasional/2011/08/28/fpi-senang-sctv-batal-tayangkan-film-tanda-tanya
Putra, P. (2019, Mei). Wali Kota Padang Larang Penayangan Film ‘Kucumbu Tubuh Indahku.’ Kompas.Com. Retrieved from https://regional.kompas.com/read/2019/05/09/10312451/wali-kota-padang-larang-penayangan-film-kucumbu-tubuh-indahku>
Reksa, A. F. A. (2015). Kritik Terhadap Modernitas: Tinjauan Buku Dialectic of Enlightenment (Adorno & Horkheimer, 2002). Jurnal Kajian Wilayah, 6(1), 93–99.
Sasono, E. (2016, Mei). Prenjak, Alat Kelamin, dan Perkara yang Belum Selesai. BBC Indonesia. Retrieved from https://www.bbc.com/Indonesia/majalah/2016/05/160523_majalah_prenjak>.
Suryanto, H., & Amri, M. (2018). Film as Cultural Diplomation Assets. CAPTURE: Jurnal Seni Media Rekam, 9(2), 47–55. doi: 10.33153/capture.v9i2.2089
Taylor, S. J., Bogdan, R., & DeVault, M. L. (2016). Introduction to Qualitative Research Method: A Guidebook and Resource (4th ed.). New Jersey: John Wiley & Sons, Inc.
Wijayanto, N. (2017). Tembus 1 Juta Penonton, Ayat-Ayat Cinta Bersaing dengan Film Hollywood. INews.Id. Retrieved from https://www.inews.id/lifestyle/film/tembus-1-juta-penonton-ayat-ayat-cinta-bersaing-dengan-film-hollywood
Zidni, F. (2016, Mei). Daftar Negatif Investasi Film. Kompasiana. Retrieved from https://www.kompasiana.com/fauzanzidni/57453caa349373ff04cba363/daftar-negatif-investasi-film>.
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2021 Sri Nugroho Nugroho

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
Copyright
Authors who publish with Capture: Jurnal Seni Media Rekam agree to the following terms:
- Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY-SA 4.0) that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgment of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgment of its initial publication in this journal.