Exploring the traditional ritual of Jaran Kepang Papat: context, heritage, and significance

Authors

  • Rr. Paramitha Dyah Fitriasari Pengkajian Seni Pertunjukan dan Seni Rupa, Universitas Gadjah Mada Yogyakarta
  • Maharani Hares Kaeksi Pengkajian Seni Pertunjukan dan Seni Rupa, Universitas Gadjah Mada Yogyakarta

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.33153/dewaruci.v18i2.4896

Keywords:

Jaran Kepang Papat, Cultural Heritage, Ritual Significance, Indonesian Cultural Landscape, Anthropological Exploration

Abstract

This paper investigates the traditional ritual of Jaran Kepang Papat, examining its contextual significance, cultural heritage, and the profound role it plays within the Indonesian cultural landscape. Jaran Kepang Papat is a unique and captivating ritual deeply rooted in Javanese culture. Through an interdisciplinary exploration encompassing anthropology, history, and cultural studies, this research unravels the intricate web of meaning and symbolism embedded in the ritual. The method employed in this research is descriptive qualitative. Researchers initiated the data collection process through in-depth interviews with ritual participants, community leaders, and cultural experts knowledgeable about Jaran Kepang Papat. These interviews provide comprehensive insight into the history, meaning, and significance of this ritual. Additionally, researchers engaged in participatory observation during the implementation of the ritual to gain a direct understanding of how it is carried out and experienced by the participants. The paper concludes by emphasizing the importance of understanding and safeguarding Jaran Kepang Papat as a valuable cultural treasure, advocating for its continued recognition and appreciation within the broader cultural discourse. This exploration serves as a testament to the enduring significance of traditional rituals in our globalized society, offering valuable insights into the preservation and appreciation of cultural heritage.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

D. Aldridge, “Music, Communication and Medicine: Discussion Paper,” J. R. Soc. Med., vol. 82, no. 12, pp. 743–746, Dec. 1989, doi: 10.1177/014107688908201215.

X. Hu, “New media and cultural heritage politics: the intertwining of official authorised heritage discourse, folk decentralisation, and internet positivity in Chinese women’s scripts,” Int. J. Herit. Stud., vol. 29, no. 6, pp. 547–565, Jun. 2023, doi: 10.1080/13527258.2023.2201869.

A. F. C. Holl, “Traditions and Cultural Heritage: Genesis, Reproduction, and Preservation,” in Traditions and Cultural Heritage: Genesis, Reproduction, and Preservation, B P International (a part of SCIENCEDOMAIN International), 2023, pp. 1–15. doi: 10.9734/bpi/mono/978-81-19039-58-6/CH0

M. Lis, “Contemporary Wayang Beber in Central Java,” Asian Theatr. J., vol. 31, no. 2, pp. 505–523, 2014, doi: 10.1353/atj.2014.0029.

F. Yuen, P. Ranahan, W. Linds, and L. Goulet, “Leisure, cultural continuity, and life promotion,” Ann. Leis. Res., vol. 24, no. 1, pp. 92–113, Jan. 2021, doi: 10.1080/11745398.2019.1653778.

F. J. Conway, “Local and public heritage at a World Heritage site,” Ann. Tour. Res., vol. 44, pp. 143–155, Jan. 2014, doi: 10.1016/j.annals.2013.09.007.

D. Carrier, “Art and Its Preservation,” J. Aesthet. Art Crit., vol. 43, no. 3, pp. 291–300, Mar. 1985, doi: 10.1111/1540_6245.jaac43.3.0291.

K. Aldiabat and C.-L. Le Navenec, Data Saturation: The Mysterious Step In Grounded Theory Method. 2018. doi: 10.46743/2160-3715/2018.2994

R. Furman and L. Dill, “Extreme data reduction: the case for the research Tanka,” J. Poet. Ther., vol. 28, no. 1, pp. 43–52, Jan. 2015, doi: 10.1080/08893675.2015.990755.

J. P. Goetz and M. D. LeCompte, “Ethnographic Research and the Problem of Data Reduction,” Anthropol. Educ. Q., vol. 12, no. 1, pp. 51–70, Mar. 1981, doi: 10.1525/aeq.1981.12.1.05x1283i.

E. Hargittai, “Is Bigger Always Better? Potential Biases of Big Data Derived from Social Network Sites,” Ann. Am. Acad. Pol. Soc. Sci., vol. 659, no. 1, pp. 63–76, May 2015, doi: 10.1177/0002716215570866.

A. J. Copeland and D. E. Agosto, “Diagrams and Relational Maps: The Use of Graphic Elicitation Techniques with Interviewing for Data Collection, Analysis, and Display,” Int. J. Qual. Methods, vol. 11, no. 5, pp. 513–533, Dec. 2012, doi: 10.1177/160940691201100501.

T. J. Gordon, “Fascism and the Female Form: Performance Art in the Third Reich,” J. Hist. Sex., vol. 11, no. 1, pp. 164–200, 2002, doi: 10.1353/sex.2002.0004.

G. H. Elder, “Age Differentiation and the Life Course,” Annu. Rev. Sociol., vol. 1, no. 1, pp. 165–190, Aug. 1975, doi: 10.1146/annurev.so.01.080175.001121.

P. Pramudita, S. Sarwanto, S. Soetarno, and D. Pratama, “Jagad Ageng and Jagad Alit In Traditional Kayons,” Dewa Ruci J. Pengkaj. dan Pencipta. Seni, vol. 14, no. 2, pp. 13–26, Feb. 2020, doi: 10.33153/dewaruci.v14i2.2850.

C. Geertz, “Ritual and Social Change: A Javanese Example,” in Ritual, Routledge, 2017, pp. 549–576. doi: 10.4324/9781315244099-32

R. Soedarsono, Pengantar Apresiasi Seni. Jakarta: Balai Pustaka, 1992.

A. Istiqomah, “Bentuk Pertunjukan Jaran Kepang Papat di Dusun Mantran Wetan Desa Girirejo Kecamatan Ngablak Kabupaten Magelang,” J. Seni Tari, vol. 6, no. 1, 2017.

D. Reed-Danahay, Bourdieu and social space: mobilities, trajectories, emplacements. Berghahn Books, 2019. doi: 10.2307/j.ctv1dwq1m3

J. M. Gurr, “Bourdieu, Capital, and the Postcolonial Marketplace,” in Commodifying (Post)Colonialism, BRILL, 2010, pp. 1–19. doi: 10.1163/9789042032279_002

T. Barrett, “Storying Bourdieu: fragments toward a Bourdieusian approach to ‘life histories,’” Int. J. Qual. Methods, vol. 14, no. 5, p. 160940691562139, Dec. 2015, doi: 10.1177/1609406915621399.

H.-M. Husu, “Bourdieu and Social Movements: Considering Identity Movements in Terms of Field, Capital and Habitus,” Soc. Mov. Stud., vol. 12, no. 3, pp. 264–279, Aug. 2013, doi: 10.1080/14742837.2012.704174.

P. Bourdieu, “The field of cultural production, or: The economic world reversed,” Poetics, vol. 12, no. 4–5, pp. 311–356, Nov. 1983, doi: 10.1016/0304-422X(83)90012-8.

P. Bourdieu and R. Johnson, The Field of Cultural Production: Essays on Art and Culture. London: Routledge, 1993.

D. Vaughan, “Bourdieu and organizations: the empirical challenge,” Theory Soc., vol. 37, no. 1, pp. 65–81, Feb. 2008, doi: 10.1007/s11186-007-9056-7.

C. L. Decoteau, “The reflexive habitus: Critical realist and Bourdieusian social action,” Eur. J. Soc. Theory, vol. 19, no. 3, pp. 303–321, Aug. 2016, doi: 10.1177/1368431015590700.

M. H. Desan, “Bourdieu, Marx, and capital: A critique of the extension model,” Sociol. Theory, vol. 31, no. 4, pp. 318–342, Dec. 2013, doi: 10.1177/0735275113513265.

J. Tittenbrun, “Concepts of capital in Pierre Bourdieu’s theory,” Misc. Anthropol. Sociol., vol. 17, no. 1, pp. 81–103, Apr. 2016, doi: 10.5604/20842937.1212314.

E. Shils, “Tradition,” Comp. Stud. Soc. Hist., vol. 13, no. 2, pp. 122–159, Apr. 1971, doi: 10.1017/S0010417500006186.

E. Shils, Tradition. USA: The University of Chicago Press, 1981.

M. Teeuwen, M. Sen, and A. P. Rots, “Festivals in Asia: patronage, play, and piety,” Religion, vol. 53, no. 3, pp. 387–405, Jul. 2023, doi: 10.1080/0048721X.2023.2211395.

N. Abercrombie and S. Hill, “Paternalism and Patronage,” Br. J. Sociol., vol. 27, no. 4, pp. 413–429, Dec. 1976, doi: 10.2307/590182.

A. Giddens, “Modernity and Self-Identity: Self and Society in the Late Modern Age,” in The New Social Theory Reader, Routledge, 2020, pp. 354–361. doi: 10.4324/9781003060963-59

Downloads

Published

2023-11-04

Issue

Vol. 18 No. 2 (2023)

Section

Articles

License

License and Copyright Agreement

In submitting the manuscript to the journal, the authors certify that:

  • They are authorized by their co-authors to enter into these arrangements.
  • The work described has not been formally published before, except in the form of an abstract or as part of a published lecture, review, thesis, or overlay journal. Please also carefully read Dewa Ruci's Posting Your Article Policy at https://jurnal.isi-ska.ac.id/index.php/dewaruci/about/editorialPolicies#peerReviewProcess
  • That it is not under consideration for publication elsewhere,
  • That its publication has been approved by all the author(s) and by the responsible authorities – tacitly or explicitly – of the institutes where the work has been carried out.
  • They secure the right to reproduce any material that has already been published or copyrighted elsewhere.
  • They agree to the following license and copyright agreement.

Copyright

Authors who publish with Dewa Ruci: Jurnal Pengkajian dan Penciptaan Seni agree to the following terms:

  1. Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY-SA 4.0) that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgment of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal. 
  2. Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgment of its initial publication in this journal.
  3. Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work.

Licensing for Data Publication

Dewa Ruci: Jurnal Pengkajian dan Penciptaan Seni use a variety of waivers and licenses, that are specifically designed for and appropriate for the treatment of data:

Other data publishing licenses may be allowed as exceptions (subject to approval by the editor on a case-by-case basis) and should be justified with a written statement from the author, which will be published with the article.

Open Data and Software Publishing and Sharing

The journal strives to maximize the replicability of the research published in it. Authors are thus required to share all data, code or protocols underlying the research reported in their articles. Exceptions are permitted but have to be justified in a written public statement accompanying the article.

Datasets and software should be deposited and permanently archived inappropriate, trusted, general, or domain-specific repositories (please consult http://service.re3data.org and/or software repositories such as GitHub, GitLab, Bioinformatics.org, or equivalent). The associated persistent identifiers (e.g. DOI, or others) of the dataset(s) must be included in the data or software resources section of the article. Reference(s) to datasets and software should also be included in the reference list of the article with DOIs (where available). Where no domain-specific data repository exists, authors should deposit their datasets in a general repository such as ZENODO, Dryad, Dataverse, or others.

Small data may also be published as data files or packages supplementary to a research article, however, the authors should prefer in all cases a deposition in data repositories.