Unveiling toxic masculinity symbols: Peircean semiotic analysis in films “Seperti Dendam Rindu Harus Dibayar Tuntas”
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.33153/dewaruci.v18i2.5384Keywords:
Toxic Masculinity, Film Representation, Masculine Characters, Societal Pressures, Peirce's SemioticsAbstract
“Seperti Dendam Rindu Harus Dibayar Tuntas” movie depicts how societal pressures concerning masculine characters are illustrated through male attractiveness, centered around their genitalia, the dominance of power, the suppression of emotions or sadness, and physical strength and toughness. According to Terry A. Kupers, toxic masculinity comprises four main components: the suppression of anything labeled as feminine, emotional repression, male domination, and aggression. This study employs a qualitative and descriptive approach to illustrate the phenomenon of toxic masculinity in films. The data collection is conducted through documentary, observational, and literary methods and subsequently analyzed using Peirce's semiotics by examining icons, indexes, and symbols. The research results demonstrate that the representation of toxic masculinity in the film is portrayed through Ajo Kawir as the main character who suffers from impotence and adopts masculine traits to mask his condition. Toxic masculinity behavior is more likely to be produced when Ajo Kawir's masculinity is threatened. Ajo's toxic masculinity behavior becomes more extreme after experiencing erectile dysfunction. Furthermore, this research reveals that sexual power is a part of toxic masculinity, depicted by viewing male genitalia as a symbol of virility. Related to the characteristics of toxic masculinity, this research identifies a complementary character in Kupers' concept, which is excessive sexual processes.Downloads
References
H. Gray, “The Age of Toxicity: The Influence of Gender Roles and Toxic Masculinity in Harmful Heterosexual Relationship Behaviours,” Can. J. Fam. Youth / Le J. Can. Fam. la Jeun., vol. 13, no. 3, pp. 41–52, Apr. 2021, doi: 10.29173/cjfy29621.
A. C. Rahayu, A. Romadani, and S. Sudarwati, “Gender Intervention Through Toxic Masculinity in Hashimi’s The Pearl That Broke Its Shell,” Anaphora J. Lang. Lit. Cult. Stud., vol. 5, no. 1, pp. 84–91, Jul. 2022, doi: 10.30996/anaphora.v5i1.6638.
E. Lianawati, Akhir Perjantanan Dunia, Cetakan Pertama. D.I. Yogyakarta: Buku Mojok Grup, 2022.
A. Jenney and D. Exner-Cortens, “Toxic Masculinity and Mental Health in Young Women: An Analysis of 13 Reasons Why,” Affilia, vol. 33, no. 3, pp. 410–417, Aug. 2018, doi: 10.1177/0886109918762492.
G. Sharp and J. Oates, “Sociocultural Influences on Men’s Penis Size Perceptions and Decisions to Undergo Penile Augmentation: A Qualitative Study,” Aesthetic Surg. J., vol. 39, no. 11, pp. 1253–1259, Oct. 2019, doi: 10.1093/asj/sjz154.
Y. Xiao et al., “Factors associated with anxiety and depression in patients with erectile dysfunction: a cross-sectional study,” BMC Psychol., vol. 11, no. 1, p. 36, Feb. 2023, doi: 10.1186/s40359-023-01074-w.
W. Udasmoro, “Toxic Masculinities in Post-9/11 Islam-Themed French Novels: Plateforme and Syngué Sabour. Pierre de Patience,” k@ta, vol. 24, no. 1, pp. 40–48, Jul. 2022, doi: 10.9744/kata.24.1.40-48.
N. N. U. Siagian, “A Potrayal of Toxic Masculinity in Thanos’s Avengers: Endgame,” LITERA Kult. J. Lit. Cult. Stud., vol. 9, no. 2, pp. 59–65, 2021.
D. M. M. Mabrouk, “The Dilemma of Toxic Masculinity in Eastern and Western Societies; With Reference to the Novel ‘Men in Prison,’” Open J. Soc. Sci., vol. 08, no. 06, pp. 419–437, 2020, doi: 10.4236/jss.2020.86032.
I. Rosida, P. Merdeka, A. N. Chaliza, A. A. Nisa, and M. Sodikin, “Toxic masculinity in Michael Rohrbaugh’s American Male,” LITERA, vol. 21, no. 1, pp. 66–80, Mar. 2022, doi: 10.21831/ltr.v21i1.39792.
H. V. Safira, “Representasi Maskulinitas dalam Film 27 Steps of May,” vol. 03, no. 2, pp. 1–11, 2020.
S. de Boise, “Editorial: is masculinity toxic?,” NORMA, vol. 14, no. 3, pp. 147–151, Jul. 2019, doi: 10.1080/18902138.2019.1654742.
B. W. Sculos, “Who’s Afraid of ‘Toxic Masculinity’?,” Cl. Race Corp. Power, vol. 5, no. 3, pp. 1–5, Nov. 2017, doi: 10.25148/CRCP.5.3.006517.
C. Harrington, “What is ‘Toxic Masculinity’ and Why Does it Matter?,” Men Masc., vol. 24, no. 2, pp. 345–352, Jun. 2021, doi: 10.1177/1097184X20943254.
V. Yaşayan, “Manifestations of Toxic Masculinity in Cormac McCarthy’s Blood Meridian or the Evening Redness in the West,” Am. Stud. Scand., vol. 53, no. 2, pp. 69–99, Dec. 2021, doi: 10.22439/asca.v53i2.6392.
A. Wahyudi, A. E. Sm, and B. Risdiyanto, “Representasi Toxic Masculinity Pada Film ‘Nanti Kita Cerita Tentang Hari Ini (NKCTHI),’” J. Komun. dan Budaya, vol. 3, no. 1, pp. 101–111, Jun. 2022, doi: 10.54895/jkb.v3i1.1425.
A. Sobur, Semiotika Komunikasi, 5th ed. Bandung: Remaja Rosdakarya, 2017.
D. W. Setyanto, S. Soewarlan, and S. Tinarbuko, “Words Representation of Postfeminism in Indonesian Heroine Character : Case Study of Valentine Film,” Dewa Ruci J. Pengkaj. dan Pencipta. Seni, vol. 14, no. 2, pp. 47–56, Mar. 2020, doi: 10.33153/dewaruci.v14i2.2797.
S. S. Nafsika, Z. S. Soetedja, I. Sarbeni, and H. Supiarza, “Aesthetic film: constructive perspective art directors,” vol. 17, no. 2, 2022.
A. Syahriyani and M. K. Novikasandra, “Feminism in Enola Holmes Film: A Semiotic Lens,” Elit. English Lit. J., vol. 9, no. 2, pp. 215–229, Dec. 2022, doi: 10.24252/elite.v9i2.32298.
Z. A. Dweich, “Cartoons: Themes and lessons: A semiotic analysis,” 2022.
N. Vera, Semiotika dalam Riset Komunikasi. Bogor: Penerbit Ghalia Indonesia, 2014.
M. W. Astutik and R. A. Paryontri, “The Illegal Racing Community Phenomenon: A Case Study of the Meaning of Toxic Masculinity Behavior in Krian,” Psikostudia J. Psikol., vol. 11, no. 2, p. 293, Jun. 2022, doi: 10.30872/psikostudia.v11i2.7528.
O. Kovsh and M. Dziuba, “Symbolism of Color in Cinema,” Bull. Kyiv Natl. Univ. Cult. Arts. Ser. Audiov. Art Prod., vol. 5, no. 2, pp. 207–215, Dec. 2022, doi: 10.31866/2617-2674.5.2.2022.269532.
M. Abou Elmagd, “Is Billiards Considered A Sport?,” J. Adv. Sport. Phys. Educ., vol. 02, no. 07, pp. 157–161, Sep. 2019, doi: 10.36348/JASPE.2019.v02i07.006.
S. A. Yanaayuri and I. P. S. Agung, “Color Grading sebagai Pembangun Mood pada Setting Waktu dalam Web Series Rewrite,” TEXTURE Art Cult. J., vol. 5, no. 1, pp. 1–14, Aug. 2022, doi: 10.33153/texture.v5i1.4316.
C. C. Petersson and L. Plantin, “Breaking with Norms of Masculinity: Men Making Sense of Their Experience of Sexual Assault,” Clin. Soc. Work J., vol. 47, no. 4, pp. 372–383, Dec. 2019, doi: 10.1007/s10615-019-00699-y.
A. Y. Lubis and I. V. Oisina, “Discursive Symbolism in A Semiotic Approach on the Joker Movie Trailer,” J. ILMU Komun., vol. 19, no. 1, pp. 121–138, Jun. 2022, doi: 10.24002/jik.v19i1.3493.
I. P. Sari and W. Udasmoro, “Visual Pleasure in Kawabata Yasunari’s Novella House of the Sleeping Beauties,” Ling. Cult., vol. 14, no. 2, pp. 187–193, Dec. 2020, doi: 10.21512/lc.v14i2.6601.
A. Waling, “‘Inoculate Boys Against Toxic Masculinity’: Exploring Discourses of Men and Masculinity in #Metoo Commentaries,” J. Men’s Stud., vol. 31, no. 1, pp. 130–156, Mar. 2023, doi: 10.1177/10608265221092044.
A. Kågesten et al., “Understanding Factors that Shape Gender Attitudes in Early Adolescence Globally: A Mixed-Methods Systematic Review,” PLoS One, vol. 11, no. 6, p. e0157805, Jun. 2016, doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0157805.
Y. D. Wijaya, “Hubungan Keterlibatan Pengasuhan Ayah Dengan Maskulinitas Mahasiswa Pria Universitas ‘X’ di Jakarta,” vol. 15, 2017.
A. Amin, A. Kågesten, E. Adebayo, and V. Chandra-Mouli, “Addressing Gender Socialization and Masculinity Norms Among Adolescent Boys: Policy and Programmatic Implications,” J. Adolesc. Heal., vol. 62, no. 3, pp. S3–S5, Mar. 2018, doi: 10.1016/j.jadohealth.2017.06.022.
R. Mora, “‘Dicks are for chicks’: Latino boys, masculinity, and the abjection of homosexuality,” Gend. Educ., vol. 25, no. 3, pp. 340–356, 2013, doi: 10.1080/09540253.2012.757298.
P. J. Fleming, J. G. L. Lee, and S. L. Dworkin, “‘Real men don’t’: Constructions of masculinity and inadvertent harm in public health interventions,” Am. J. Public Health, vol. 104, no. 6, pp. 1029–1035, 2014. doi: 10.2105/AJPH.2013.301820
B. M. King, L. M. Duncan, K. M. Clinkenbeard, M. B. Rutland, and K. M. Ryan, “Social Desirability and Young Men’s Self-Reports of Penis Size,” J. Sex Marital Ther., vol. 45, no. 5, pp. 452–455, Jul. 2019, doi: 10.1080/0092623X.2018.1533905.
M. J. Clarke, A. D. G. Marks, and A. D. Lykins, “Effect of Normative Masculinity on Males’ Dysfunctional Sexual Beliefs, Sexual Attitudes, and Perceptions of Sexual Functioning,” J. Sex Res., vol. 52, no. 3, pp. 327–337, Mar. 2015, doi: 10.1080/00224499.2013.860072.
E. Wentzell, “How Did Erectile Dysfunction Become ‘Natural’? A Review of the Critical Social Scientific Literature on Medical Treatment for Male Sexual Dysfunction,” J. Sex Res., vol. 54, no. 4–5, pp. 486–506, Jun. 2017, doi: 10.1080/00224499.2016.1259386.
Y. J. Wong, M.-H. R. Ho, S.-Y. Wang, and I. S. K. Miller, “Meta-analyses of the relationship between conformity to masculine norms and mental health-related outcomes.,” J. Couns. Psychol., vol. 64, no. 1, pp. 80–93, 2017, doi: 10.1037/cou0000176.
M. Makhanya, “Causes and Consequences of Toxic Masculinity: Can HeForShe Be a Solution for Gender-Based Violence?,” Gend. Inequal. - Issues, Challenges New Perspect., pp. 1–16, 2023, doi: 10.5772/intechopen.110872.
S. K. Chambers, E. Chung, G. Wittert, and M. K. Hyde, “Erectile dysfunction, masculinity, and psychosocial outcomes: a review of the experiences of men after prostate cancer treatment,” Transl. Androl. Urol., vol. 6, no. 1, pp. 60–68, Feb. 2017, doi: 10.21037/tau.2016.08.12.
M. F. F. Ramdani and P. A. D. Wisesa, “Realitas Toxic Masculinity di Masyarakat,” 2022.
S. I. Khan et al., “Phallus, performance and power: crisis of masculinity,” Sex. Relatsh. Ther., vol. 23, no. 1, pp. 37–49, Feb. 2008, doi: 10.1080/14681990701790635.
S. Khumalo, M. Mabaso, T. Makusha, and M. Taylor, “Intersections Between Masculinities and Sexual Behaviors Among Young Men at the University of KwaZulu-Natal, South Africa,” SAGE Open, vol. 11, no. 3, p. 215824402110401, Jul. 2021, doi: 10.1177/21582440211040114.
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
License and Copyright Agreement
In submitting the manuscript to the journal, the authors certify that:
- They are authorized by their co-authors to enter into these arrangements.
- The work described has not been formally published before, except in the form of an abstract or as part of a published lecture, review, thesis, or overlay journal. Please also carefully read Dewa Ruci's Posting Your Article Policy at https://jurnal.isi-ska.ac.id/index.php/dewaruci/about/editorialPolicies#peerReviewProcess
- That it is not under consideration for publication elsewhere,
- That its publication has been approved by all the author(s) and by the responsible authorities – tacitly or explicitly – of the institutes where the work has been carried out.
- They secure the right to reproduce any material that has already been published or copyrighted elsewhere.
- They agree to the following license and copyright agreement.
Copyright
Authors who publish with Dewa Ruci: Jurnal Pengkajian dan Penciptaan Seni agree to the following terms:
- Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY-SA 4.0) that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgment of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgment of its initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work.
Licensing for Data Publication
Dewa Ruci: Jurnal Pengkajian dan Penciptaan Seni use a variety of waivers and licenses, that are specifically designed for and appropriate for the treatment of data:
Open Data Commons Attribution License, http://www.opendatacommons.org/licenses/by/1.0/ (default)
Creative Commons CC-Zero Waiver, http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/
Open Data Commons Public Domain Dedication and Licence, http://www.opendatacommons.org/licenses/pddl/1-0/
Other data publishing licenses may be allowed as exceptions (subject to approval by the editor on a case-by-case basis) and should be justified with a written statement from the author, which will be published with the article.
Open Data and Software Publishing and Sharing
The journal strives to maximize the replicability of the research published in it. Authors are thus required to share all data, code or protocols underlying the research reported in their articles. Exceptions are permitted but have to be justified in a written public statement accompanying the article.
Datasets and software should be deposited and permanently archived inappropriate, trusted, general, or domain-specific repositories (please consult http://service.re3data.org and/or software repositories such as GitHub, GitLab, Bioinformatics.org, or equivalent). The associated persistent identifiers (e.g. DOI, or others) of the dataset(s) must be included in the data or software resources section of the article. Reference(s) to datasets and software should also be included in the reference list of the article with DOIs (where available). Where no domain-specific data repository exists, authors should deposit their datasets in a general repository such as ZENODO, Dryad, Dataverse, or others.
Small data may also be published as data files or packages supplementary to a research article, however, the authors should prefer in all cases a deposition in data repositories.
