Alu Katentong performance, history, form, and function at a wedding event in Padang Laweh

Article Sidebar

PDF
Published: Nov 24, 2023
DOI: https://doi.org/10.33153/dewaruci.v18i2.5417
Keywords:
Alu Katentong, Minangkabau art, Cultural preservation, Form and Function, Wedding ceremony

Main Article Content

Syeilendra Syeilendra
Pendidikan Sendratasik, Fakultas Bahasa dan Seni, Universitas Negeri Padang
Ayuthia Mayang Sari
Pendidikan Sendratasik, Fakultas Bahasa dan Seni, Universitas Negeri Padang

Abstract

Alu Katentong is a traditional Minangkabau art that persists in Nagari Padang Laweh, Tanah Datar Regency. The purpose of this research is to establish that Alu Katentong is an essential and meaningful element in a wedding ceremony. This qualitative study employs a descriptive analysis approach. Data collection techniques include literature review, observation, interviews, documentation, and triangulation. Data analysis involves data clarification, reduction, presentation, and drawing conclusions. The research findings demonstrate that the inclusion of Alu Katentong in wedding ceremonies is a prerequisite for adhering to local customs and traditions, as well as for the preservation of local culture. The performance elements encompass the following: The function of Alu Katentong art serves as a traditional complement to the wedding ceremony procession, provides entertainment and spectacle, functions as a means of communication, acts as a unifying force in society, contributes to cultural preservation, and serves as a medium for educating the community. The presentation takes the form of a coordinated ensemble arrangement comprising several alu, lasuang, and flat stones in a circular formation facing forward (lasuang). This artistic performance commences at noon following various wedding processions leading up to the manjapuik and maanta marapulai procession.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Article Details

Issue
Vol. 18 No. 2 (2023)
Section
Articles

Authors who publish in Dewa Ruci: Jurnal Pengkajian dan Penciptaan Seni agree to the following terms:

  1. Authors retain copyright and grant the Dewa Ruci: Jurnal Pengkajian dan Penciptaan Seni right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY-SA 4.0) that allows others to share (copy and redistribute the material in any medium or format) and adapt (remix, transform, and build upon the material) the work for any purpose, even commercially with an acknowledgment of the work's authorship and initial publication in Dewa Ruci: Jurnal Pengkajian dan Penciptaan Seni.
  2. Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgment of its initial publication in Dewa Ruci: Jurnal Pengkajian dan Penciptaan Seni.
  3. Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work (See The Effect of Open Access).

    Lisensi Creative Commons

    This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License

References

H. Ramanta and S. Samsuri, “The Values of Local Wisdom of Minangkabau Culture in a Baralek Gadang Traditional Wedding,” Humaniora, vol. 11, no. 3, pp. 193–201, 2020, doi: 10.21512/humaniora.v11i3.6625.

F. A. Siregar, F. Yulika, Nofialdi, I. Harahap, B. Ridwan, and I. Syahputra, “Merantau in the Ethnic Tradition of Minangkabau: Local Custom without Sharia Basis?,” Samarah, vol. 6, no. 1, pp. 115–138, 2022, doi: 10.22373/sjhk.v6i1.9954.

J. Ferreira, B. M. Sousa, and F. Gonçalves, “Encouraging the subsistence artisan entrepreneurship in handicraft and creative contexts,” J. Enterprising Communities, vol. 13, no. 1–2, pp. 64–83, 2019, doi: 10.1108/JEC-09-2018-0068.

E. D. EW and A. . S. Pradoko, “The Myth of Alu Katentong’s Art in a Wedding Ceremony in Tanah Datar Regency, West Sumatra: A Study of Meaning and Educational Values,” Proc. Int. Conf. Learn. Adv. Educ. (ICOLAE 2021), vol. 662, no. Icolae 2021, pp. 862–869, 2022, doi: 10.2991/assehr.k.220503.092.

R. Alexandro, P. Pernandes, E. Karliani, F. Hariatama, and T. Uda, “The Implementation of Nucu Ngoruh in The Traditional Marriage of The Dayak Siang Tribe,” J. Ilm. Pendidik. Pancasila dan Kewarganegaraan, vol. 7, no. 2, p. 387, Jul. 2022, doi: 10.17977/um019v7i2p387-394.

K. Negus, “From creator to data: the post-record music industry and the digital conglomerates,” Media, Cult. Soc., vol. 41, no. 3, pp. 367–384, Apr. 2019, doi: 10.1177/0163443718799395.

W. Wahyono and B. Hutahayan, “Performance art strategy for tourism segmentation: (a Silat movement of Minangkabau ethnic group) in the event of tourism performance improvement,” J. Islam. Mark., vol. 11, no. 3, pp. 643–659, 2020, doi: 10.1108/JIMA-10-2017-0116.

K. Devers, Richard M. Frankel, “Qualitative Research: A Consumer’s Guide,” Educ. Heal. Chang. Learn. Pract., vol. 13, no. 1, pp. 113–123, Mar. 2000, doi: 10.1080/135762800110664.

D. Royadi, N. Susiana, and F. A. Khumaida, “Effectiveness Management of Qualitative Research in Writing Scientific Papers,” Aptisi Trans. Manag., vol. 3, no. 1, pp. 84–90, Jan. 2019, doi: 10.33050/atm.v3i1.848.

A. A. Alhazmi and A. Kaufmann, “Phenomenological Qualitative Methods Applied to the Analysis of Cross-Cultural Experience in Novel Educational Social Contexts,” Frontiers in Psychology, vol. 13. 25-Apr-2022, doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2022.785134.

D. G. Fara, “Further Steps towards a Theory of Descriptions as Predicates,” Anal. Philos., vol. 57, no. 2, pp. 91–109, Jun. 2016, doi: 10.1111/phib.12076.

C. S. Collins and C. M. Stockton, “The Central Role of Theory in Qualitative Research,” Int. J. Qual. Methods, vol. 17, no. 1, p. 160940691879747, Dec. 2018, doi: 10.1177/1609406918797475.

R. S. Natow, “The use of triangulation in qualitative studies employing elite interviews,” Qual. Res., vol. 20, no. 2, pp. 160–173, Apr. 2020, doi: 10.1177/1468794119830077.

S. Budi, A. H. Hamid, F. Fajri, and A. Agussabti, “The role of customary institutions for agricultural communities and agricultural extension,” Trop. Subtrop. Agroecosystems, vol. 22, no. 2, pp. 443–450, Jul. 2019, doi: 10.56369/tsaes.2720.

E. Aziz, M. Dzofir, and A. Widodo, “The acculturation of islam and customary law: An experience of Minangkabau, Indonesia,” Qudus Int. J. Islam. Stud., vol. 8, no. 1, pp. 131–160, 2020, doi: 10.21043/QIJIS.V8I1.7197.

Zulkifli and M. Ridwan, “Revitalization of the traditional values lost due to the commodification of art/crafts: a case study of Bataknese traditional Ulos,” Asian Ethn., vol. 20, no. 4, pp. 541–554, 2019, doi: 10.1080/14631369.2019.1608812.

I. B. Gorbunova, “Electronic Musical Instruments: to the Problem of Formation of Performance Mastery,” 2018, doi: 10.17758/uruae4.uh10184023.

W. P. Nelga, Wimbrayardi, and Marzam, “Analisis ritem lagu-lagu alu katentong Nagari Padang Laweh Kabupaten Tanah Datar,” J. Sendratasik, vol. 7, no. 1, pp. 47–52, 2018.

A. M. Sari, S. Syeilendra, and H. A. Hidayat, “Jejak falsafah Alam Takambang Jadi Guru dalam repertoar musik tradisional Minangkabau,” Satwika Kaji. Ilmu Budaya dan Perubahan Sos., vol. 7, no. 1, pp. 143–152, 2023, doi: 10.22219/satwika.v7i1.25242.

H. Bang and M. Delong, “Everyday Creativity Practiced through a Capsule Wardrobe,” Sustain., vol. 14, no. 4, pp. 1–23, 2022, doi: 10.3390/su14042092.

R. Rahmi, A. Yulastri, and N. Syah, “Desain busana pesta bernuansa etnis Aceh,” Imaji, vol. 18, no. 2, pp. 107–113, Mar. 2021, doi: 10.21831/imaji.v18i2.26062.

A. Mukarram, “Identitas budaya musik gambus di Palembang,” Imaji, vol. 15, no. 1, pp. 9–23, Sep. 2017, doi: 10.21831/imaji.v15i1.13885.

C. Fischer, C. P. Malycha, and E. Schafmann, “The influence of intrinsic motivation and synergistic extrinsic motivators on creativity and innovation,” Front. Psychol., vol. 10, no. FEB, pp. 1–15, 2019, doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2019.00137.

A. L. Rahmi and A. Gunawan, “Home Garden Concept of Rumah Gadang based on Minangkabau Culture,” IOP Conf. Ser. Earth Environ. Sci., vol. 501, no. 1, 2020, doi: 10.1088/1755-1315/501/1/012022.

I. Escher and P. Brzustewicz, “Inter-organizational collaboration on projects supporting sustainable development goals: The company perspective,” Sustain., vol. 12, no. 12, 2020, doi: 10.3390/su12124969.

R. Retnowati, H. Suryanto, P. Purwanto, J. O. Haryanto, and H. A. Widyanto, “Economic and Tourism Empowerment of Rawa Pening Supported by Local Culture and Wisdom (A Study on Rawa Pening, Ambarawa),” J. Int. Conf. Proc., vol. 3, no. 1, pp. 221–230, 2020, doi: 10.32535/jicp.v2i4.797.

H. Hijriani and R. Ramadani, “From Criminal Law to Customary Law: Incest as a Sexual Crime,” Yuridika, vol. 37, no. 2, pp. 399–414, 2022, doi: 10.20473/ydk.v37i2.32830.

D. Mueser and P. Vlachos, “Almost like being there? A conceptualisation of live-streaming theatre,” Int. J. Event Festiv. Manag., vol. 9, no. 2, pp. 183–203, 2018, doi: 10.1108/IJEFM-05-2018-0030.

K. Tarigan and P. Tarigan, “Dance in the Karo Society : Important to Learning and Practicing,” J. Posit. Sch. Psychol., vol. 6, no. 4, pp. 11825–11838, 2022.

Y. Yensharti, “Peran Organ Tunggal Dalam Acara Baralek Di Padang,” Imaji, vol. 5, no. 1, 2015, doi: 10.21831/imaji.v13i2.6694.

M. Tang and H. Liao, “From conventional group decision making to large-scale group decision making: What are the challenges and how to meet them in big data era? A state-of-the-art survey,” Omega (United Kingdom), vol. 100, p. 102141, 2021, doi: 10.1016/j.omega.2019.102141.

Takwa, B. Arafah, D. Sopiandy, S. J. Taqfiah, and A. N. B. Arafah, “Humanistic Values in Metaphoric Expressions of Traditional Marriage in Tolaki Mekongga Kolaka,” Theory Pract. Lang. Stud., vol. 12, no. 8, pp. 1602–1608, 2022, doi: 10.17507/tpls.1208.16.