An analysis of the dress of the female warriors of the palace of Mangkunegara I at the 1991 palace festival

Authors

  • Linda Utami Institut Seni Indonesia Surakarta
  • Sunarmi Sunarmi Institut Seni Indonesia Surakarta
  • Rahayu Adi Prabowo Institut Seni Indonesia Surakarta

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.33153/dewaruci.v18i2.5431

Keywords:

Female warriors, Mangkunegara Palace, Aesthetic morphology, Mangkunegara I, Javanese culture

Abstract

The military apparatus in each region is established to maintain its sovereignty. The Prajurti women of the Mangkunegara Palace were an elite group of soldiers who participated in Raden Mas Said's struggle. As an extraordinary group of warriors in Mangkunegaran history, they have unique clothing that needs further research. The palace attire is one of the important cultural heritages that must be preserved. In Javanese culture, it is taught that dressing appropriately is in accordance with guidelines, situations, and conditions. This article discusses the attire of the Prajurti women of the Mangkunegara Palace, which was reintroduced during the Keraton Festival in 1991 by Trenggono. The research used descriptive analysis techniques, describing the research subject through collected data without analysis or drawing conclusions. The approach used was the aesthetic morphology approach of Thomas Munro. Based on this, this research explains the women's clothing of the Mangkunegara Palace Soldiers by Trenggono, which was displayed at the 1991 Palace Festival. The result shows that there is a discrepancy between the description of the attire of the Prajurti women of the Mangkunegara Palace in Serat Babad Nitik Mangkunegara I and II and the attire created by Trenggono.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

E. Fatmawati, “Strategies to grow a proud attitude towards Indonesian cultural diversity,” Linguist. Cult. Rev., vol. 5, no. S1, pp. 810–820, 2021. doi: 10.21744/lingcure.v5nS1.1465

F. Hidayani, “Prajurit Wanita Jawa dalam Istana Mangkunegara I Surakarta,” Muwazah, vol. 5, no. 1, pp. 33–41, Mar. 2014, doi: 10.28918/muwazah.v5i1.335.

M. Adas, “From Avoidance to Confrontation: Peasant Protest in Precolonial and Colonial Southeast Asia,” Comp. Stud. Soc. Hist., vol. 23, no. 2, pp. 217–247, Apr. 1981, doi: 10.1017/S0010417500013281.

Septianti, “Kostum Prajurit Keraton Yogyakarta,” Corak J. Seni Kriya, vol. 7, no. 2, pp. 89–100, 2019. doi: 10.24821/corak.v7i2.2673

R. M. Soedarsono, “The Place Of Court Dance And Music In The Javanese Kratons And Its Relation To The Political Situation,” Humaniora, vol. 14, no. 3, pp. 1–14, 2002, doi: https://doi.org/10.22146/jh.759.

P. Carey, “Waiting for the ‘Just King’: The Agrarian World of South-Central Java from Giyanti (1755) to the Java War (1825–30),” Mod. Asian Stud., vol. 20, no. 1, pp. 59–137, Feb. 1986, doi: 10.1017/S0026749X00013603.

J. Daryanto, “Nengsemaken in Surakarta Karaton Karawitan Performance,” Int. J. Vis. Perform. Arts, vol. 1, no. 1, pp. 1–6, Jun. 2019, doi: 10.31763/viperarts.v1i1.7.

A. Kumar, Masyarakat Istana Jawa dan Politik dalan Akhir Abad 18: Prajurit Perempuan Wanita. 2008.

M. T. Mudarahayu, I. N. Sedana, A. A. G. R. Remawa, and I. K. Sariada, “Estetika Bentuk Busana Pada Lukisan Wayang Kamasan,” Panggung, vol. 31, no. 2, Jun. 2021, doi: 10.26742/panggung.v31i2.1573.

S. Septianti, “Kostum Prajurit Kraton Yogyakarta Kajian Peran dan Nilai Simbolik,” Corak, vol. 7, no. 2, pp. 89–100, Oct. 2018, doi: 10.24821/corak.v7i2.2673.

D. Rama and A. Isworo, “Kajian busana tokoh Drupadi wayang kulit purwa gagrak Surakarta dengan pendekatan estetika,” TextureArt Cult. J., vol. 3, no. 2, pp. 84–93, Feb. 2021, doi: 10.33153/texture.v3i2.2808.

I. Gilligan, “Clothing and the Discovery of Science,” Found. Sci., vol. 28, no. 3, pp. 1–30, Jul. 2023, doi: 10.1007/s10699-023-09924-x.

D. Crane, “Postmodernism and the Avant-Garde: Stylistic Change in Fashion Design,” Modmod. (Baltim. Md)., vol. 4, no. 3, pp. 123–140, 1997, doi: 10.1353/mod.1997.0050.

M. Aghaei, F. Parezzan, M. Dimiccoli, P. Radeva, and M. Cristani, “Clothing and People - A Social Signal Processing Perspective,” in 2017 12th IEEE International Conference on Automatic Face & Gesture Recognition (FG 2017), 2017, pp. 532–537, doi: 10.1109/FG.2017.71.

C. D. Wardhana, “Kesetaraan Gender Dalam Babad Tutur Karya Mangkunegara I,” Jumantara, vol. 6, no. 1, pp. 91–108, 2015.

D. Barbieri and S. Pantouvaki, “Towards a philosophy of costume,” Stud. Costume Perform., vol. 1, no. 1, pp. 3–7, 2016. doi: 10.1386/scp.1.1.3_2

J. König, R. Santagata, T. Scheiner, A.-K. Adleff, X. Yang, and G. Kaiser, “Teacher noticing: A systematic literature review of conceptualizations, research designs, and findings on learning to notice,” Educ. Res. Rev., vol. 36, p. 100453, Jun. 2022, doi: 10.1016/j.edurev.2022.100453.

M. F. Bashir, “Discovering the evolution of Pollution Haven Hypothesis: A literature review and future research agenda,” Environ. Sci. Pollut. Res., vol. 29, no. 32, pp. 48210–48232, Jul. 2022, doi: 10.1007/s11356-022-20782-1.

R. Przybylak, “Instrumental Observations,” in The Polish Climate in the European Context: An Historical Overview, Dordrecht: Springer Netherlands, 2010, pp. 129–166. doi: 10.1007/978-90-481-3167-9_5

T. Munro, “he morphology of art as a branch of aesthetics,” J. Aesthet. Art Crit., vol. 12, no. 4, pp. 438–449, Jun. 1954, doi: 10.1111/1540_6245.jaac12.4.0438.

T. Munro, “The Analysis of Form in Art,” Teach. Coll. Rec. Voice Scholarsh. Educ., vol. 42, no. 9, pp. 349–368, Jul. 1941, doi: 10.1177/016146814104200925.

W. Seeley and A. Kozbelt, “Art, Artists, and Perception: A Model for Premotor Contributions to Perceptual Analysis and Form Recognition,” Philos. Psychol., vol. 21, no. 2, pp. 149–171, Apr. 2008, doi: 10.1080/09515080801976573.

Agatha, “Prajurit Estri Mangkunegaran,” Panjebar Semangat, Surabaya, p. 9, 1991.

V. A. Lanzona and F. Rettig, Women Warriors in Southeast Asia. Routledge, 2020. doi: 10.4324/9781315737829

A. Syahid, “Islam and H. G. Nahuys’ Memoirs on the Java War 1825-1830,” Stud. Islam., vol. 27, no. 3, Dec. 2020, doi: 10.36712/sdi.v27i3.11633.

S. A. Kriskartika, T. S. Pitana, and S. Susanto, “Javanese Islam during Mangkunegara I leadership,” IBDA` J. Kaji. Islam dan Budaya, vol. 17, no. 1, pp. 60–78, Jul. 2019, doi: 10.24090/ibda.v17i1.2238.

K. Okado, “When women are kings: cross-gendered expression in an all-female central javanese court dance-drama and its public reception,” J. Urban Cult. Res. Cent., vol. 2, pp. 19–30, 2011.

I. Esti, W. Warsito, and A. A. Kun, “Javanese Women in Old Literature Text: Literature Ethnography Study,” BASA, 2019, doi: http://repository.unwidha.com:880/id/eprint/2293.

S. Ratna Saktimulya, “Le manuscrit du Langen Wibawa du palais du Pakualaman (Yogyakarta),” Archipel, vol. 79, no. 1, pp. 101–124, 2010, doi: 10.3406/arch.2010.4163.

B. A. Suparno, S. N. Indah, and K. Hasanah, “Unveiling the Secrets of Pura Mangkunegaran’s Communication Practices: A Pathway to Cultural Preservation,” in International Conference on Advance Research in Social and Economic Science (ICARSE 2022), 2023, pp. 398–408, doi: 10.2991/978-2-38476-048-0_43.

V. J. H. Houben, “Dutch intervention in the Principalities after 1830,” in Kraton and Kumpeni, BRILL, 1994, pp. 137–190. doi: 10.1163/9789004454330_006

Y. Mangadeg, Pangeran Sambernyawa, Ringkasan Sejarah Perjuangannya. Surakarta: Yayasan Mangadeg, 1988.

D. Barbieri and S. Pantouvaki, “Costume and ethics: Reflections on past, present and future entanglements,” Stud. Costume Perform., vol. 5, no. 1, pp. 3–11, 2020, doi: 10.1386/scp_00010_2.

Downloads

Published

2023-11-03

Issue

Vol. 18 No. 2 (2023)

Section

Articles

License

License and Copyright Agreement

In submitting the manuscript to the journal, the authors certify that:

  • They are authorized by their co-authors to enter into these arrangements.
  • The work described has not been formally published before, except in the form of an abstract or as part of a published lecture, review, thesis, or overlay journal. Please also carefully read Dewa Ruci's Posting Your Article Policy at https://jurnal.isi-ska.ac.id/index.php/dewaruci/about/editorialPolicies#peerReviewProcess
  • That it is not under consideration for publication elsewhere,
  • That its publication has been approved by all the author(s) and by the responsible authorities – tacitly or explicitly – of the institutes where the work has been carried out.
  • They secure the right to reproduce any material that has already been published or copyrighted elsewhere.
  • They agree to the following license and copyright agreement.

Copyright

Authors who publish with Dewa Ruci: Jurnal Pengkajian dan Penciptaan Seni agree to the following terms:

  1. Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY-SA 4.0) that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgment of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal. 
  2. Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgment of its initial publication in this journal.
  3. Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work.

Licensing for Data Publication

Dewa Ruci: Jurnal Pengkajian dan Penciptaan Seni use a variety of waivers and licenses, that are specifically designed for and appropriate for the treatment of data:

Other data publishing licenses may be allowed as exceptions (subject to approval by the editor on a case-by-case basis) and should be justified with a written statement from the author, which will be published with the article.

Open Data and Software Publishing and Sharing

The journal strives to maximize the replicability of the research published in it. Authors are thus required to share all data, code or protocols underlying the research reported in their articles. Exceptions are permitted but have to be justified in a written public statement accompanying the article.

Datasets and software should be deposited and permanently archived inappropriate, trusted, general, or domain-specific repositories (please consult http://service.re3data.org and/or software repositories such as GitHub, GitLab, Bioinformatics.org, or equivalent). The associated persistent identifiers (e.g. DOI, or others) of the dataset(s) must be included in the data or software resources section of the article. Reference(s) to datasets and software should also be included in the reference list of the article with DOIs (where available). Where no domain-specific data repository exists, authors should deposit their datasets in a general repository such as ZENODO, Dryad, Dataverse, or others.

Small data may also be published as data files or packages supplementary to a research article, however, the authors should prefer in all cases a deposition in data repositories.