Artificial intelligence-based innovation of batik motif design in Indonesia and Malaysia: a cross-cultural collaborative approach for sustainable cultural preservation

Article Sidebar

PDF
Published: Jun 23, 2026
DOI: https://doi.org/10.33153/dewaruci.v21i1.8047
Keywords:
Generative AI, Text-to-image, Batik motif, Cultural heritage, Practice-based design, Indonesia–Malaysia

Main Article Content

Adlien Fadlia
Institut Kesenian Jakarta, Jakarta
Farid Abdullah
Universitas Pendidikan Indonesia, Bandung
Ahamad Tarmizi Azizan
University Malaysia Kelantan, Kelantan Darul Naim
Aneeza Mohd Adnan
Universiti Teknologi MARA, Malaysia

Abstract

This study documents and analyses a practice-based collaboration in which Indonesian and Malaysian designers used generative artificial intelligence (AI) to synthesise shared batik motifs, and examines how faithfully the source motifs survived that process. Adopting a practice-based / research through-design approach, the study brought together practitioner researchers from three Indonesian and two Malaysian institutions. Six iconic source motifs Parang, Truntum, and Mega Mendung (Indonesia) and Bunga Kerak Nasi, Pucuk Rebung, and the Tiger Orchid motif (Malaysia) were combined through a structured prompt protocol using two text to image platforms (Midjourney and Bing Image Creator) and refined in Adobe Illustrator. The resulting nine motif outputs and two garment visualisations were assessed through iconographic visual analysis and collaborative expert appraisal across four dimensions: cultural fidelity, cultural distortion, design innovation, and design-stage resource efficiency. The analysis shows that generative AI was effective for ideation and cross tradition synthesis but unreliable for fidelity. Only the discrete, radially repeatable Truntum was reproduced with high fidelity, whereas the directional, field-organising geometric motifs Parang and Pucuk Rebung were the least faithful; because this weakness appeared in motifs from both traditions, it reflects a structural limitation of the technology rather than a national bias. Colour was the least controllable parameter, and culturally faithful results emerged only through a human corrective stage, positioning AI as a partner in human AI co-production. The study contributes a replicable cross-national workflow, an analytical mapping of motif fidelity, and a reframing of the two traditions from contested ownership toward shared authorship.

 

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Article Details

Issue
Vol. 21 No. 1 (2026)
Section
Articles
Creative Commons License

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.

Authors who publish in Dewa Ruci: Jurnal Pengkajian dan Penciptaan Seni agree to the following terms:

  1. Authors retain copyright and grant the Dewa Ruci: Jurnal Pengkajian dan Penciptaan Seni right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY-SA 4.0) that allows others to share (copy and redistribute the material in any medium or format) and adapt (remix, transform, and build upon the material) the work for any purpose, even commercially with an acknowledgment of the work's authorship and initial publication in Dewa Ruci: Jurnal Pengkajian dan Penciptaan Seni.
  2. Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgment of its initial publication in Dewa Ruci: Jurnal Pengkajian dan Penciptaan Seni.
  3. Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work (See The Effect of Open Access).

    Lisensi Creative Commons

    This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License

References

[1] U. Hasanah, R. Magfirah, A. Setiawati, and Nurhasanah, “Menelusuri Kontroversi Klaim Budaya Perspektif Indonesia-Malaysia dalam Sengketa Warisan Budaya,” Indo-MathEdu Intellectuals J., vol. 5, no. 2, pp. 2505–2513, May 2024, doi: 10.54373/imeij.v5i2.1065.

[2] R. T. Noer, “Ambalat Dispute Settlement Analysis Study: Juridical Review of Regional Conflict Between Indonesia and Malaysia Based on an International Law Perspective,” Int. Law Discourse Southeast Asia, vol. 2, no. 2, Jul. 2023, doi: 10.15294/ildisea.v2i2.77151.

[3] Setyo Budi, Tiwi Bina Affanti, and Sayid Mataram, “Ornamental Patterns of Contemporary Indonesian Batik: Clothing for Strengthening the Articulation of Appearance Characteristics,” Wacana Seni J. Arts Discourse, vol. 23, pp. 16–28, Sep. 2024, doi: 10.21315/ws2024.23.2.

[4] M. A. F. Habib, C. R. Al Usrah, M. Fatkhullah, K. K. Nisa, and A. K. Budita, “Eksploitasi Pekerja Pada Industri Batik Rumahan,” EMPATI J. Ilmu Kesejaht. Sos., vol. 10, no. 2, pp. 150–157, Jun. 2022, doi: 10.15408/empati.v10i2.23541.

[5] I. Elemure, H. N. Dhakal, M. Leseure, and J. Radulovic, “Integration of Lean Green and Sustainability in Manufacturing: A Review on Current State and Future Perspectives,” Sustainability, vol. 15, no. 13, p. 10261, Jun. 2023, doi: 10.3390/su151310261.

[6] F. Espinoza-Castro, A. Lara-Ramírez, and J. Buele, “Environmental Sustainability in Industrial Operations: A Comprehensive Review,” in 2024 IEEE Eighth Ecuador Technical Chapters Meeting (ETCM), 2024, pp. 1–5, doi: 10.1109/ETCM63562.2024.10746185.

[7] N. Hanenkamp and O. Zipse, “Sustainability in Manufacturing Transforming,” in Road to Net Zero, Cham: Springer International Publishing, 2023, pp. 187–214, doi: 10.1007/978-3-031-42224-9_7.

[8] K. Nagadi, “Implementation of green, lean and six sigma operations for sustainable manufacturing. A review,” Int. J. Prod. Manag. Eng., vol. 10, no. 2, pp. 159–171, Jul. 2022, doi: 10.4995/ijpme.2022.16958.

[9] M. Samardzic and U. Marjanovic, “Multi-perspective View on Sustainable Production: A Literature Review,” 2021, pp. 55–63, doi: 10.1007/978-3-030-85906-0_6.

[10] V. Sharma, M. Kumar, P. Chatterjee, and E. D. R. S. Gonzalez, “Modelling of green manufacturing barriers using a survey-integrated decision-making approach,” Reports Mech. Eng., vol. 4, no. 1, pp. 256–275, Nov. 2023, doi: 10.31181/rme040117112023s.

[11] J. J. Fitzpatrick, “Target Ecological Limits and Not Economic Growth,” World, vol. 1, no. 2, pp. 135–148, Sep. 2020, doi: 10.3390/world1020011.

[12] M. Glogar, S. Petrak, and M. Mahnić Naglić, “Digital Technologies in the Sustainable Design and Development of Textiles and Clothing A Literature Review,” Sustainability, vol. 17, no. 4, p. 1371, Feb. 2025, doi: 10.3390/su17041371.

[13] Ijaz Raheem, “Studying How Psychological Factors Influence Conflicts and Peacebuilding Efforts within Societies,” Crit. Rev. Soc. Sci. Stud., vol. 3, no. 1, pp. 93–108, Jan. 2025, doi: 10.59075/m1pqg491.

[14] M. M. Choudhury, B. Eisenbart, and B. Kuys, “Artificial intelligence (AI) in the design process – a review and analysis on generative AI perspectives,” Proc. Des. Soc., vol. 5, pp. 631–640, Aug. 2025, doi: 10.1017/pds.2025.10077.

[15] L. Tan and M. Luhrs, “Using Generative AI Midjourney to enhance divergent and convergent thinking in an architect’s creative design process,” Des. J., vol. 27, no. 4, pp. 677–699, Jul. 2024, doi: 10.1080/14606925.2024.2353479.

[16] X. Wu and L. Li, “An application of generative AI for knitted textile design in fashion,” Des. J., vol. 27, no. 2, pp. 270–290, Mar. 2024, doi: 10.1080/14606925.2024.2303236.

[17] S. Münster et al., “Artificial Intelligence for Digital Heritage Innovation: Setting up a R&D Agenda for Europe,” Heritage, vol. 7, no. 2, pp. 794–816, Feb. 2024, doi: 10.3390/heritage7020038.

[18] S. Sangamuang, P. Ariya, K. Intawong, S. Khanchai, and K. Puritat, “Integrating generative AI and the metaverse for cultural heritage: a case study on the preservation of Lamphun Brocade Fabric,” Humanit. Soc. Sci. Commun., vol. 12, no. 1, p. 1974, Dec. 2025, doi: 10.1057/s41599-025-06237-1.

[19] J. Zimmerman, E. Stolterman, and J. Forlizzi, “An analysis and critique of Research through Design,” in Proceedings of the 8th ACM Conference on Designing Interactive Systems, 2010, pp. 310–319, doi: 10.1145/1858171.1858228.

[20] O. Octadion, N. Yudistira, and D. Kurnianingtyas, “Synthesis of batik motifs using a diffusion - generative adversarial network,” Multimed. Tools Appl., vol. 84, no. 7, pp. 3407–3438, Jan. 2025, doi: 10.1007/s11042-025-20620-9.

[21] G. Rizzi and P. Bertola, “Exploring the generative AI potential in the fashion design process: an experimental experience on the collaboration between fashion design practitioners and generative AI tools,” Eur. J. Cult. Manag. Policy, vol. 15, May 2025, doi: 10.3389/ejcmp.2025.13875.