Deconstruction of iconic characters: binary opposition and différance in the visual-narrative design of Darth Vader, Naruto, and Mario

Article Sidebar

PDF
Published: Jun 23, 2026
DOI: https://doi.org/10.33153/dewaruci.v21i1.8357
Keywords:
Deconstruction, Différance, Binary opposition, Character design, Visual narrative, Iconic characters

Main Article Content

Ahmad Faisal Choiril Anam Fathoni
Bina Nusantara University, West Jakarta
Ercilia Rini Octavia
Universitas Sebelas Maret, Surakarta
Cahyono Budi Santosa
Desain Interior Institut Seni Indonesia Surakarta Indonesia

Abstract

Character design plays a crucial role in visual narrative effectiveness and emotional connection with audiences, yet existing scholarship privileges visual-narrative coherence over the role of contradiction in shaping emotional resonance. This study asks how Derridean mechanisms, binary opposition and différance, operate within iconic character design to generate interpretive depth. It employs a qualitative multiple-case design analyzing three purposively selected characters: Darth Vader, Naruto Uzumaki, and Super Mario. Selection followed three operational criteria: documented global iconicity, representation of three distinct visual traditions (Hollywood cinema, Japanese anime, and Japanese video games), and contrasting modes of iconization (tragic-antagonistic, heroic-developmental, and functional-iconic). Each case was analyzed through a four-stage deconstructive procedure—identification of the privileged binary, contradictory close reading, exposure of the moment of différance, and synthesis of layered meaning—applied to two defined units of analysis: visual units (silhouette, color, costume, facial configuration, movement, and symbolic marker) and narrative units (scene, action, transformation, and symbolic reversal). Interpretive claims were validated by returning each reading to its primary text, by cross-case pattern testing, and by author consensus. The analysis finds that resonance is generated not by design harmony but by sustained tension between visual meaning and narrative subversion, with each character organized around a distinct collapsing hierarchy: power/weakness, recognition/alienation, and complexity/simplicity. The study contributes an operational deconstructive procedure for visual-narrative research, reframes visual contradiction as a designed resource rather than a flaw, and extends deconstructive analysis across three cultural production contexts. As a textual analysis, it describes interpretive potential inscribed in the design and makes no claim about measured audience response; empirical reception testing remains a task for subsequent research.

 

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Article Details

Issue
Vol. 21 No. 1 (2026)
Section
Articles
Creative Commons License

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.

Authors who publish in Dewa Ruci: Jurnal Pengkajian dan Penciptaan Seni agree to the following terms:

  1. Authors retain copyright and grant the Dewa Ruci: Jurnal Pengkajian dan Penciptaan Seni right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY-SA 4.0) that allows others to share (copy and redistribute the material in any medium or format) and adapt (remix, transform, and build upon the material) the work for any purpose, even commercially with an acknowledgment of the work's authorship and initial publication in Dewa Ruci: Jurnal Pengkajian dan Penciptaan Seni.
  2. Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgment of its initial publication in Dewa Ruci: Jurnal Pengkajian dan Penciptaan Seni.
  3. Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work (See The Effect of Open Access).

    Lisensi Creative Commons

    This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License

References

[1] A.-S. Mousavilar and S. Pourmahmoud, “A Comparative Study of Derrida’s Binary Opposition in Escher's Day and Night,” Rev. Humanidades, no. 42, p. 11, May 2021, doi: 10.5944/rdh.42.2021.28496.

[2] R. Pradantyo, M. V. Birk, and S. Bateman, “How the Visual Design of Video Game Antagonists Affects Perception of Morality,” Front. Comput. Sci., vol. 3, Apr. 2021, doi: 10.3389/fcomp.2021.531713.

[3] V. Idone Cassone, “Gotta face ‘em all: Pokémon, Japanese animated characters, and the emergence of playful visual animism,” Sign Syst. Stud., vol. 49, no. 3–4, pp. 543–565, Dec. 2021, doi: 10.12697/SSS.2021.49.3-4.15.

[4] J. Liedgren, P. M. A. Desmet, and A. Gaggioli, “Liminal design: A conceptual framework and three-step approach for developing technology that delivers transcendence and deeper experiences,” Front. Psychol., vol. 14, Feb. 2023, doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2023.1043170.

[5] E. Sandry, R. Gomez, and K. Nakamura, “Art, Design and Communication Theory in Creating the Communicative Social Robot ‘Haru,’” Front. Robot. AI, vol. 8, Mar. 2021, doi: 10.3389/frobt.2021.577107.

[6] M. G. Shilina and M. Zarifian, “Re-thinking Semiotics: a New Categorization of a Sign?,” Rudn J. Lang. Stud. Semiot. Semant., vol. 14, no. 2, pp. 305–313, Jun. 2023, doi: 10.22363/2313-2299-2023-14-2-305-313.

[7] L. Sáenz Benavides, “Narrative Resistance and Emotional Transformations,” Hypatia, vol. 40, no. 4, pp. 802–823, May 2025, doi: 10.1017/hyp.2025.16.

[8] M. B. M. Al-Abbas, M. S. Al-Atoum, M. A. Alsaggar, and R. M. Abu-Hammad, “Aesthetics and Semiotics of Communication in Visual Language: A Multimodal Criticism on the Short Film of Ismail,” Theory Pract. Lang. Stud., vol. 14, no. 2, pp. 570–577, Feb. 2024, doi: 10.17507/tpls.1402.30.

[9] O. Johnston and F. Thomas, “The illusion of life: Disney animation,” 1981.

[10] S. McCloud, “Understanding comics: The invisible art (Reprint edition),” New York Morrow, 1994.

[11] E. Simsek and A. A. Bozdag, “A visual social semiotic investigation into the popularity of Ronaldo and Messi’s chess photo on Instagram: Implications for new media and audience engagement,” Online J. Commun. Media Technol., vol. 14, no. 3, p. e202432, Jul. 2024, doi: 10.30935/ojcmt/14603.

[12] N. Derin Isikoren and F. Kalkan, “Comparative Image Analysis in Visual Arts and Art Education,” EURASIA J. Math. Sci. Technol. Educ., vol. 13, no. 11, Nov. 2017, doi: 10.12973/ejmste/79605.

[13] R. Frazer and E. Moyer-Gusé, “Engaging the Dark Side: Exploring Identification with Morally Complex Antagonists,” Mass Commun. Soc., vol. 26, no. 2, pp. 177–200, Mar. 2023, doi: 10.1080/15205436.2021.1968436.

[14] D. Setiawan and D. Aditama, “Nilai Moral pada Dialog dalam Serial Anime ‘Naruto Shippuden’: Analisis Semiotika Ferdinand De Saussure,” Magenta | Off. J. STMK Trisakti, vol. 7, no. 02, pp. 1112–1120, Aug. 2023, doi: 10.61344/magenta.v7i02.104.

[15] X. Cao, M. Watanabe, and K. Ono, “How Character-Centric Game Icon Design Affects the Perception of Gameplay,” Appl. Sci., vol. 11, no. 21, p. 9911, Oct. 2021, doi: 10.3390/app11219911.

[16] E. D. Martínez Aguilar, S. Witjes, and R. ten Bos, “Deconstruction as a Research Strategy for Discourse Studies: An Aporetic and Iterable Model for Opening Discourses,” Int. J. Qual. Methods, vol. 24, Apr. 2025, doi: 10.1177/16094069251349470.

[17] N. Campbell, “Regarding Derrida: the tasks of visual deconstruction,” Qual. Res. Organ. Manag. An Int. J., vol. 7, no. 1, pp. 105–124, May 2012, doi: 10.1108/17465641211223492.

[18] J. Fleming, Cultural Graphology: Writing after Derrida. University of Chicago Press, 2016.

[19] J. Derrida, Writing and Difference. Routledge, 2001, doi: 10.4324/9780203991787.

[20] M. Lamont, “How to become a dominant French philosopher: The case of Jacques Derrida,” Am. J. Sociol., vol. 93, no. 3, pp. 584–622, 1987.

[21] K. Kroó, “On some aspects of the binary in the context of the ternary and the plural in Juri Lotman’s semiotics of literature,” Neohelicon, vol. 49, no. 2, pp. 593–606, Dec. 2022, doi: 10.1007/s11059-022-00650-0.

[22] J. Campbell, “The herowith a thousand faces,” New York New World Libr., 1949.

[23] U. Margolin, “Structuralist approaches to character in narrative: The state of the art,” Semiotica, vol. 75, no. 1–2, pp. 1–24, 1989, doi: 10.1515/semi.1989.75.1-2.1.

[24] C. Tseng, A. Z. Wang, G. J. Quadri, and D. A. Szafir, “Shape It Up: An Empirically Grounded Approach for Designing Shape Palettes,” IEEE Trans. Vis. Comput. Graph., vol. 31, no. 1, pp. 349–359, Jan. 2025, doi: 10.1109/TVCG.2024.3456385.

[25] E. Liberman-Pincu, Y. Parmet, and T. Oron-Gilad, “Judging a Socially Assistive Robot by Its Cover: The Effect of Body Structure, Outline, and Color on Users’ Perception,” ACM Trans. Human-Robot Interact., vol. 12, no. 2, pp. 1–26, Jun. 2023, doi: 10.1145/3571717.

[26] M. Smith, Engaging characters: Fiction, emotion, and the cinema. Oxford University Press, 2022.

[27] C. Tybjerg, “Passionate Views: Film, Cognition, and Emotion . Carl Plantinga, Greg M. Smith.,” Film Q., vol. 54, no. 1, pp. 52–54, Oct. 2000, doi: 10.1525/fq.2000.54.1.04a00130.

[28] R. M. Willems, “MA-EM: A neurocognitive model for understanding mixed and ambiguous emotions and morality,” Cogn. Neurosci., vol. 14, no. 2, pp. 51–60, Apr. 2023, doi: 10.1080/17588928.2022.2132223.

[29] C. Rühlemann, “How is emotional resonance achieved in storytellings of sadness/distress?,” Front. Psychol., vol. 13, Sep. 2022, doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2022.952119.

[30] O. Nikulina, A. C. R. van Riel, J. G. A. M. Lemmink, D. Grewal, and M. Wetzels, “Narrate, Act, and Resonate to Tell a Visual Story: A Systematic Review of How Images Transport Viewers,” J. Advert., vol. 53, no. 4, pp. 605–625, Aug. 2024, doi: 10.1080/00913367.2024.2309921.

[31] A. O. Agwuele, “Deconstruction Theory, Rumi’s Discourse and Their Application in Design Process,” Intellect. News, vol. 14, no. 1, pp. 21–25, Dec. 2004, doi: 10.1080/17496977.2004.11417765.

[32] M. Sablé-Meyer, K. Ellis, J. Tenenbaum, and S. Dehaene, “A language of thought for the mental representation of geometric shapes,” Cogn. Psychol., vol. 139, p. 101527, Dec. 2022, doi: 10.1016/j.cogpsych.2022.101527.

[33] S. L. Bowman, “Finding the self in role-playing games: Weaving myth, narrative, and identity,” Media Pract. Educ., vol. 25, no. 2, pp. 160–173, Apr. 2024, doi: 10.1080/25741136.2024.2324085.

[34] D. Lehner, “The Heroine’s/Hero’s Journey A Call for Transformation? Transformative Learning, Archetypal Patterns, and Embodied Knowing/Learning,” J. Transform. Educ., vol. 20, no. 2, pp. 88–104, Apr. 2022, doi: 10.1177/15413446211007089.

[35] S. H. Yudhanto, “Multimodal Discourse Analysis of Studio Ghibli Movie Posters,” J. Vis. Art Des., vol. 16, no. 2, pp. 229–247, Mar. 2025, doi: 10.5614/j.vad.2024.16.2.6.

[36] H. Helmita and R. Hasila Diandri, “Study of Sign in The Naruto Film: A Semiotic Analysis,” J. Ilm. Lang. Parol., vol. 9, no. 1, pp. 67–73, Dec. 2025, doi: 10.36057/jilp.v9i1.777.

[37] C. Pradies, M. Berti, M. Pina e Cunha, A. Rego, A. Tunarosa, and S. Clegg, “A Figure is Worth a Thousand Words: The role of visualization in paradox theorizing,” Organ. Stud., vol. 44, no. 8, pp. 1231–1257, Aug. 2023, doi: 10.1177/01708406231161998.

[38] B. F. J, P. Revathi, S. W. Mohsin, A. A. Dorathy, and R. Ramya, “From Destabilisation to Reparative Connection: A Derridean Reading of Sally Rooney’s Normal People,” Theory Pract. Lang. Stud., vol. 16, no. 1, pp. 174–182, Jan. 2026, doi: 10.17507/tpls.1601.19.

[39] T. A. Krysanova and I. S. Shevchenko, “Multisemiotic Patterns Of Emotive Meaning-Making In Film,” Alfred Nobel Univ. J. Philol., vol. 2, no. 24, pp. 238–248, Dec. 2022, doi: 10.32342/2523-4463-2022-2-24-20.

[40] L. de F. Carvalho, F. K. Miguel, and G. Pianowski, “Teaching differential diagnosis with Anakin Skywalker: the duel between borderline personality disorder and bipolar disorder,” Estud. Psicol., vol. 40, 2023, doi: 10.1590/1982-0275202340e210047.

[41] A. Vandewalle, S. Malliet, and K. Demoen, “Playing with Character: A Framework of Characterization in Video Games,” Games Cult., vol. 19, no. 6, pp. 722–742, Sep. 2024, doi: 10.1177/15554120231179496.

[42] A. Homolar, “A call to arms: Hero–villain narratives in US security discourse,” Secur. Dialogue, vol. 53, no. 4, pp. 324–341, Aug. 2022, doi: 10.1177/09670106211005897.

[43] E. V. De Guzman, “Uzumaki Nagato’s existential ideology on suffering: A phenomenological commentary,” Int. J. Multidiscip. Res. Growth Eval., pp. 172–177, May 2022, doi: 10.54660/anfo.2022.3.3.12.

[44] A. S. Lu and A. C. Moller, “Elaborating the Role of Narrative and Self-Determination Theory in Video Game Design Research,” Interact. Comput., vol. 38, no. 3, pp. 501–515, Apr. 2026, doi: 10.1093/iwc/iwae058.

[45] S. Şengün, J. M. Santos, J. Salminen, M. Milenkovic, and B. J. Jansen, “Is Death Only the Beginning? How People Mourn Artificial Characters in Social Media,” Games Cult., vol. 20, no. 1, pp. 77–124, Jan. 2025, doi: 10.1177/15554120231190195.

[46] E. Hayot, “Video Games & the Novel,” Daedalus, vol. 150, no. 1, pp. 178–187, Jan. 2021, doi: 10.1162/daed_a_01841.

[47] V. Erb, S. Lee, and Y. Y. Doh, “Player-Character Relationship and Game Satisfaction in Narrative Game: Focus on Player Experience of Character Switch in The Last of Us Part II,” Front. Psychol., vol. 12, Sep. 2021, doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2021.709926.

[48] A. V. Khodorenko, “Visual Metaphor In Paratranslation Of Literary Image,” Alfred Nobel Univ. J. Philol., vol. 2, no. 30, pp. 430–457, Dec. 2025, doi: 10.32342/3041-217X-2025-2-30-22.