KAJIAN SOSIOPRAGMATIK TINDAK TUTUR ASERTIF DALAM ADEGAN LIMBUKAN

S., Suratno

Abstract


This study aims to describe the verbal interaction behavior in the dialogue of two female panakawan
in wayang purwa performance by Ki Purbo Asmoro. The analysis is focused on (1) identifying the
kind of assertive speech act, deciding the dominant speech act, (2) conveying the speech
implicature and describing the implementation of assertive speech act in relation to Grice’s cooperative principles. The findings include once, the assertive speech act consists of: a. informing, b.
telling, c. thinking, d. convincing, e. responding, f. ensuring, g. confirming, h. estimating, i.
remembering, and j. implicating. The dominant assertive speech act from all the kinds is “informing†speech act. Secondly, based on the dominant conventional implicature and thirdly, there is
intentionally infraction of Grice’s cooperative principles in order to get the audiences’ sympathy as
well as to make them happy, and also to convey the explicit speech and to fulfill the politeness
principles.
Keywords: assertive speech act, implicature, and implementation.

Full Text:

PDF

References


Asim Gunarwan. 2006. “The Speech Act of Criticizing among Native Speakers of

Javaneseâ€. Makalah dalam Pertemuan

pada firth Internasional Meeting of the South East Asian Linguistic Society,

Oregon 9-12 Mei 2006.

Edi Subroto. 1988. Semantik Leksikal I dan II.

Surakarta: UNS Press.

Fooley, Kathy. 1985. “The Clown in the

Sundanese Wayang Golek: Democratization of a Feodal Ethosâ€. In

Scenarium, Deel 9: Theatre of Java.

Zutphen: De Walburg.

Grice, H. Paul. 1981. “Presupposition and Conversational Implicature†dalam Radical

Pragmatics. New York: Academic

Press.

Jaka Rianto. 2004. “Nilai-Nilai Estetis Dalam

Lakon Banjaran Durno Sajian Ki Purbo

Asmoroâ€. Tesis. Yogyakarta: Universitas Gadjah Mada.

Kats, J. 1943. “Wie is Semar?†In Djawa 3: 55.

Leech Geofrey N. 1993. Pinsip-prinsip Pragmatik.

(Terjemahan M.D.D. Oka). Jakarta:

Universitas Indonesia Press.

Maurenbrecher, E.W. 1939. “De Panakawan

Figuren in de Cheribon Wayangâ€. In

Djawa, 19: 187-190.

Ras, J.J. 1978. “De Clownfiguren in de wayangâ€.

dalam jurnal: Bijdragen tot de Taal-,

Land- en Volkenkunde 134 (1978), No:

, Leiden, hal: 451-465.

Sarwanto. 2007. “Fungsi dan Makna

Pertunjukan Wayang Kulit dalam

Upacara Bersih Desa di Daerah eks

Karesidenan Surakartaâ€. Disertasi.

Yogyakarta: Universitas Gadjah Mada.

Sri Mulyono. 1977. Wayang dan Karakter Wanita.

Jakarta: Gunung Agung.

—————. 1978. Apa dan Siapa Semar.

Jakarta: Gunung Agung.

—————. 1978. Wayang: Asal-usul, Filsafat,

dan Masa Depannya. Jakarta: Gunung

Agung.

Suratno. 2012. “ Kajian Sosiopragmatik Tindak

Tutur Adergan Limbukan Dalam Seni

Pertunjukan wayang Purwa di

Surakarta (Studi Kasus terhadap Ki

Anom Suroto, Ki Purbo Asmoro, dan

Warseno Slenk)â€. Disertasi. Surakarta:

Universitas Sebelas Maret.

Yule, George. 1996. Pragmatics. Oxford: Oxford University Press.




DOI: https://doi.org/10.33153/lakon.v11i1.2152

Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.


Copyright (c) 2018 Lakon Jurnal Pengkajian & Penciptaan Wayang



Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.

 

ISSN 1829-5835 (print)

Jurnal Lakon indexed by: