Accessibility Analysis of Existing Disabled Users at Neha Hub, Cilandak Jakarta

Main Article Content

Elsa Fasfahisofkha
Sri Riswanti
Rio

Abstract

As a public space, Neha Hub is a mixed-use space that involves various facilities including educational art spaces, art gallery spaces, music studios, and is a means of various entertainment and cultural arts performances. Neha Hub also collaborates with Creativite Indonesia, a management engaged in the organization of creativity activities that collaborate in various arts and creativity activities, such as crafts, fashion, interiors, architecture, photography, and performing arts through educational activities. With various facilities available to realize the vision and mission of further developing the quality of performances by not distinguishing participants in terms of age, gender, interests and inclinations including people with disabilities to be able to participate in it. This will be the focus of the research compiled. The research aims to find out the barriers and find solutions to accessibility problems faced by people with disabilities when visiting Neha Hub. The research was conducted at the Neha Hub public space in Cilandak, South Jakarta. The author uses a combination of quantitative methods in data collection and ergonomic aspects and qualitative methods as a basis for analyzing the humanities of existing conditions. Referring to Ron Mace's universal design theory, (1980) which states that with the perception of projects and environments designed and occupied, considering the possibility of their use by different user profiles: from children to the elderly, including certain limitations. Based on the survey that has been conducted, it is known that accessibility in the Neha Hub public space is not friendly to people with disabilities. Therefore, Neha Hub as a public space must have facilities and infrastructure needed by all groups including people with disabilities.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Article Details

Section
Articles

References

Adi Putrag, G. and Triwahyono, D. (2020). Ruang Temporer Sosial Sebagai Salah Satu Bentuk Ruang Sosial Dan Aspirasi Masyarakat Dalam Pemenuhan Kebutuhan Ruang Publik Kota. Pawon: Jurnal Arsitektur, 4(01), pp.77–88. doi:https://doi.org/10.36040/pawon.v4i01.2348.

Hantono, D. and Ariantantrie, N. (2018). Kajian Ruang Publik Dan Isu Yang Berkembang Di Dalamnya. Vitruvian, 8(1), p.43. doi:https://doi.org/10.22441/vitruvian.2018.v8i1.005.

Hantono, D., Sidabutar, Y.F.D. and Hanafiah, U.I.M. (2018). Kajian Ruang Publik Kota Antara Aktivitas Dan Keterbatasan. Langkau Betang: Jurnal Arsitektur, 5(2), p.80. doi:https://doi.org/10.26418/lantang.v5i2.29387.

Harahap, R., Gambiro, H. and Sanjaya, R. (2019). Studi Penerapan Desain Universal Pada Mesjid Manarul Amal Kampus Meruya Di Universitas Mercu Buana Jakarta Barat. Studi Penerapan Desain Universal Pada Mesjid Manarul Amal Kampus Meruya Di Universitas Mercu Buana Jakarta Barat, 7(1). doi:https://doi.org/10.30998/jurnaldesain.v7i1.4188.

Priscyllia, F. (2016). Kajian Hukum Terhadap Fasilitas Pelayanan Publik Bagi Penyandang Disabilitas. Lex Crimen, 5(3), p.3442.

Ramadhan, D.A., Solekhah, A.S. and Marinda, F. (2021). Revisi Undang-Undang Perlindungan Disabilitas: Aksesibilitas Perlindungan Hukum Terhadap Kekerasan Seksual. Ikatan Penulis Mahasiswa Hukum Indonesia Law Journal, 1(2), pp.206–224. doi:https://doi.org/10.15294/ipmhi.v1i2.53331.