EKSISTENSI SUYARTO SEBAGAI SINDEN LANANG: SEBUAH BIOGRAFI
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.33153/keteg.v22i2.4366Keywords:
sindenan, excistence, sinden lanangAbstract
This article antitled “The existence of Suyarto As a Sinden Lanang:a Biography” is based on the research by Endah Ayu Prasetyo, primarily examines the existence of Suyarto as a sinden lanang who existed in between 1995-2006. There are two important issues subject to discussion which are 1) how was the process oftransforming and developing artistry of Suyarto as a sinden lanang until he became famous? and 2) why in between 1995 and 2006 Suyarto’s name was known as sinden lanang?. Suyarto, who came from a farming family and only attended elementary school, was able to become a successful male sinden in 1995-2006. This research describes Suyarto’s artistic experience to reach his existence. The study uses a historical approach by Kuntowijoyo, especially biographies which examine the character’s personality, supportive social forces, historical circumstances of his era, and luck and opportunity. This thought is synergized with Alvin Boskoff’s theory, that a change is influenced by internal and external factors.Collecting the necessary data was carried out by following qualitative research procedures and oral history. Apart from literary data and artifacts, the informants’ testimonies against Suyarto are also a very important source of data in this research.Downloads
References
Anselm Strauss, Juliet Corbin. 2007. Dasar-Dasar Penelitian Kualitatif Tata Langkah Dan Teknik-Teknik Teoritisasi Data. Yogyakarta: Pustaka Pelajar.
Budiarti, Muriah. 2013. “Konsep Kepesindenan Dan Elemen-Elemen Dasarnya.” Harmonia: Journal of Arts Research and Education 13 (2).
Endraswara, Suwardi. 2003. Metode Penelitian Kebudayaan. Yogyakarta: GADJAH MADA UNIVERSITY PRESS.
Fitriasari, et al. (2012) “Ritual Sebagai Media Transmisi Kreativitas Seni Di Lereng Gunugn Merbabu”. Kawistara. No. 1, April 2012. Hlm 25-35.
G.R. Terry. 2012. Prinsip-prinsip Manajemen. Terjemahan J mith D. F. M. Jakarta: Bumi Aksara
Koentjaraningrat. 1981. Pengantar Ilmu Antropologi. Bandung: Rineka Cipta.
Kuntowijoyo. 2003. Metodologi Sejarah. Yogyakarta: Tiara Wacana.
Martapangrawit. 1975. “Pengetahuan Karawitan II.” Surakarta.
Morissan. 2013. Teori Komunikasi Individu Hingga Massa. Jakarta: Kencana Prenada Media Group.
Murtiyoso, Bambang. 2001. Seni, Dalang, Dan Dunianya. Institut Seni Indonesia Surakarta.
Pujiani, and Rustopo. 2017. Yati Pesek Seniman Populer Serba Bisa. Surakarta: ISI Press Surakarta.
Ratna, Nyoman Kutha. 2010. “Metodologi Penelitian Kajian Budaya Dan Ilmu Sosial Humaniora Pada Umumnya.”
Supanggah, Rahayu. 2009. “Bothekan Karawitan II: Garap.” Surakarta: ISI Press Surakarta.
Suraji. 2005. “Sindhenan Gaya Surakarta.” Institut Seni Indonesia Surakarta.
Sulaiman Gitosaprojo. “Ichtisar Teori Sindhenan”, Setensilan, Malang, 1971.
Suyoto. “Carem Puncak Kualitas Bawa dalam Karawitan Gaya Surakarta”, Desertasi, Universitas Gadjah Mada 2016
Tampubolon, 1991. Mengembangkan Minat dan Kebiasaan Membaca. Bandung. Angkasa
Tanudjaja, Bing Bedjo. 2006. “Mengemas Kesenian Tradisional Melalui Stasiun Televisi Swasta Di Indonesia.” Nirmana 8 (1).
Waridi. 1997. “R.L. Martopangrawit Emu Karawitan Gaya Surakarta Sebuah Biografi.” Universitas Gadjah Mada Yogyakarta.
Wijono, Sutarto. 2010. Psikologi Industri dan Organisasi. Jakarta: Kencana.
Wulat, Sri Hardiyono. 2013 Kesenian Sri Suparsih: Kajian Musikalitas” skripsi S-1 Karawitan ISI Surakarta.