PERAN ENDANG SRI SEDEP DALAM PADEPOKAN SENI PANDHANSARI DI KABUPATEN KARANGANYAR

Authors

  • Roni Kesuma Institut Seni Indonesia Surakarta
  • I Nyoman Sukerna Institut Seni Indonesia Surakarta
  • Siswati Siswati Institut Seni Indonesia Surakarta

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.33153/keteg.v23i1.4817

Keywords:

Endang Sri Sedep, Pandhansari, Presence, Performance Organisation

Abstract

The journal entitled “The role of Endang Sri Sedepin the Pandhansari Art Padepokan in Karanganyar Regency”, aims to reveal (1) What is the role of Endang Sri Sedep in managing art performance activities at the Pandhansari Art Padepokan? (2) Why and what factors made the Pandhansari Art POPULAR IN Karanganyar Regency? Endang Sri Sedep has a very important role in the Pandhansari Art Padepokan, this cannot be separated fromEndang who is a businessman, artist, and owner of the Pandhansari Art Padepokan. The background of thisresearch is Endang Sri Sedep abilityto manage the activities of the Pandhansari Art Padepokan using financial respurces independenthly, unlike art hermitages in general which raise donors for their activities. Apart from that, the Pandhansari Art Padepokan does not only focus on educationor training, butalso focuseson providingart performance space for the people in Karanganyar Regency both in festivals, competitions or concerts. This research is a qualulative research using analitic descrptive method. The author uses thethoughts of Soerjono Soekanto and Sedyawati. Based on this, it can be seen the role of Endang Sri Sedep in managing art performance activities and factors in the existenceof the popular Pandhansari Art Padepokan in Karanganyar Regency.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Anoegrajekti, N., Macaryus, S., & Maharani, H. M. (2020). Diversifikasi Usaha Sanggar Seni untuk Meningkatkan Kesejahteraan.

Badudu J.S, & Zain Mohammad Sutan. (2001). Kamus Umum Bahasa Indonesia Pustaka Sinar Harapan.

Basrowi, & Suwandi. (2008). Memahami Penelitian Kualitatif. Rineka Cipta.

Bungin, B. (2015). Analisis Data Penelitian Kualitatif.

Djoko Sulistyono, W. (2011). Peranan Sanggar Bima Dalam Upaya Melestarikan Kesenian Tradisional Wayang Kulit.

Kuntowijoyo. (2006). Budaya dan Masyarakat. Tiara Wacana.

Laras, A. (1988). Keberadaan Paguyuban Seni Karawitan Kantor Setda Boyolali: ISI Surakarta.

Moleong Lexy J. (2018). Metodologi Penelitian Kualitatif.

Mutaqim, A. (2018). Keberadaan Grup Karawitan Cikal Laras Di Kabupaten Karanganyar Jawa Tengah. ISI Yogyakarta.

Nawawi, H. (2016). Manajemen Sumber Daya Manusia Untuk Bisnis Yang Kompetitif. Gadjah Mada University Press.

Pace, R. W, & F. Faules, D. (2013). Komunikasi Organisasi : Strategi Meningkatkan KinerjaPerusahaan Yayasan Mitra Netra.

Adhi, P, Yulianto, (2022). Pengembangan kualitas padepokan sarotama ditinjau dari analisis swot: ISI Surakarta.

Mega Ayu & Nyoman, (2017). Eksistensi Kelompok Karawitan Cakra Baskara Di Kabupaten Karanganyar.

Permas, A. (2003). Manajemen Seni Pertunjukan.

Ratna, N. K. (2010). Metodologi Penelitian : Kajian Budaya dan Ilmu Sosial Humaniora Pada Umumnya: Pustaka Pelajar.

Sedyawati, E. (1981). Pertumbuhan Seni Pertunjukan: Sinar Harapan.

ST. Haryono (2014). Pengaruh Sri Sultan Hamengku Buwono I pada Seni Karawitan Kraton Yogyakarta: Gadjah Mada University Press.

Soedarsono, R. . (2002). Seni Pertunjukan Indonesia di Era Globalisasi: Gadjah Mada University Press.

Soedjadi, F. . (1996). Organization and Methods Penunjang Berhasilnya Proses Manajemen: Gunung Agung.

Supanggah, R. (2007). Bothekan Karawitan II: Garap: ISI Press Surakarta.

Terry, G. R. (2006). Prinsip-Prinsip Manajemen: Bumi Aksara.

Waridi, & Murtiyoso, H. B. (2005). Seni Pertunjukan Indonesia : Menimbang Pendekatan Emik Nusantara.

Downloads

Published

2023-08-29

Issue

Section

Articles